Preview

State Sovereignty

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1063 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
State Sovereignty
Stephen D. Krasner, from “Sovereignty,” Foreign Policy (January/February 2001)

Kimberly Weir, from “The Waning State of Sovereignty,” An Original Essay Written for This Volume (2002)

__________________________________________________________________

State Sovereignty is an issue that has become controversial under globalization, and the subject of this review. Sovereignty is defined as the situation where a State is an autonomous and independent entity, with the total freedom to make its own decisions in all aspects of governance. Globalisation on the other hand as Heywood (2007: p143) defines it:

“is the emergence of a complex web of interconnectedness that means that our lives are increasingly shaped by events that occur, and decisions that are made, at a great distance from us. The central feature of globalization is therefore that geographical distance is of declining relevance, and that territorial boundaries, such as those between nation-states, are becoming less significant.”

In the contemporary world, the sovereignty of the state in the international system as the principal actor however has gradually been challenged by a number of external forces (political, economic or social) and states are seen to have to grapple with such challenges . The issue on the continued existence of state sovereignty in a globalised world has therefore become controversial in world politics. Stephen D. Krasner and Kimberly Weir are two respected specialists in this field and they have shared their thoughts on the issue.

The idea of the modern state evolved in Europe over many years and Krasner, an eloquent defender of sovereignty, refuses to agree with observers that assert the Sovereign State is just about dead. Krasner argues that sovereignty is not as vibrant as other observers claimed. Thus, acknowledges that all states (particularly stronger states) are not immune to external influences. This however, does not mean states have lost their capacity to manage



Bibliography: Heywood, A. 2007, “Politics” Palgrave, China Krasner, S.D, “Sovereignty,” Foreign Policy (January/February 2001) Weir, K. “The Waning State of Sovereignty,” An Original Essay Written for This Volume (2002)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) STATE SOVEREIGNTY can achieve or hinder the achievement of an international response to global environmental protection…

    • 909 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The author breaks up his supporting argument into different sub-headings and begins with this with ‘Territory and Identity’. He proceeds to talk about the nation-state, and how it has been a dominant form of social organization and identities around the world over the past two centuries. The authors usage of a quote from Penrose, further articulates its importance:…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ushistory.org. "Federal-State Relations Today: Back to States ' Rights?." American Government Online Textbook. N.p., 2014. Web. 12 June 2014.…

    • 2318 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    world order essay

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Whilst nation states have a responsibility to protect, state sovereignty ultimately hinders the achievement of world order. State sovereignty relies to the ultimate law-making process of a state over its territory and population, including independence from external interference, as exemplified domestically in Section 51 of the Australian Constitution. Article 2(7) of the Charter of the United Nations (UN) (1945), stipulates that ‘nothing in the present Charter shall authorize the interference of any state’. Due to the non-mandatory nature of multilateral compliance, states can ultimately impede the influence of international law and use state sovereignty as a barrier to their conduct, as shown in the conflicts of Sudan, Kosovo, Libya and East Timor. However, the nationally acclaimed benchmark ‘Responsibility to Protect (R2P) (2005)’, originating from the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty’s Report, places the onus on nation states to ensure the protection of their citizens from instances of mass atrocity. The UN, enshrining of their doctrine under paragraph 138 and 139 of the Charter of the UN, bridges the limitations of state sovereignty with international law. Unfortunately, nation states may still abstain from participation with international law…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role of state and local governments has provided a vital role in defining federal relations. The relationship has been defined by a few factors: Congress, the Supreme Court or other courts, and funding policies…

    • 818 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President and Congress

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The era of globalization has witnessed the growing influence of a number of unconventional international actors, from non-governmental organizations, to multi-national corporations, to global political movements. Traditional, state-centric definitions of foreign policy as "the policy of a sovereign state in its interaction with other sovereign states is no longer sufficient. Several alternative definitions are more helpful at highlighting aspects of foreign policies.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sst 1 Task 1 Wgu

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the characteristics of a modern nation-state, the European Union, and a couple of the foreign policies of the United States. By the end of this paper there should be an understanding of what makes a modern nation-state and also some examples of countries that are either a nation or state.…

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nation states (being the country) have sovereignty, which means that they have the right to make all the laws within the territories they govern, but also allows them to make treaties with other states and these treaties are the primary source of international law. State sovereignty is the states exclusive right to make laws for its own people without interference from outside countries. It is defined by having : defined borders (geographical area), a permanent population…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is argued that statehood is attained after the fulfillment of certain prerequisites or “criteria”. Nevertheless, the application of criteria is not without problems: “The multi-criteria nature of concept, the tangled web of historically-specific pathways of state development, and differences in state forms have all contributed to substantial theoretical difficulties in reaching any wide agreement about how to define ‘the state’” (Dunleavy, Patrick,2007) What instruments have attempted to define the idea of the state? Max Weber's classic definition remains to be highly influential. His definition claims that a state is an organization which “(successfully) claims a monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory”. The Montevideo Convention is another source that is often cited as a guide in determining statehood. According to the Convention, a state should harbour a defined territory, a permanent population, and a government with the capacity to enter into relations with other states. So, is meeting these preconditions enough to be considered as a state, or does being recognized as a state define statehood? Malanczuk argues the following: “recognition is one of the most difficult topics in international law. It is a confusing mixture of politics, and international law the legal and political elements cannot be disentangled; when granting or withholding recognition, states are influenced more by political than by legal considerations, but their acts do have legal consequences. Herein, statehood becomes politically charged, and the influence of power may have a definitive effect on an entity's legal status as a state or not.…

    • 3229 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Decline of Sovereignty

    • 2804 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The past decade witnessed many conflicts which focused around the issues of sovereignty. States have invaded other sovereign states for reasons that seem to be dubious by the international community. National separatist movements have intensified and are associated with the rise of the doctrine of self-determination among nations and ethnic groups (versus sovereign states). The decline of the concept of sovereignty, the increasing international recognition of the principles of human rights and the rise of self-determination all caused many implications on the norm of non-intervention in the domestic affairs of sovereign states. That said, Is sovereignty in decline and what are the reasons for its decay? In order to answer this question, I intend to review different sources such as Nation Against State: A New Approach to Ethnic Conflicts and the Decline of Sovereignty by Gottlieb Gidon, NATO and the international politics of ethnic conflict: perspectives on theory and policy by David Carment. I will also use different databases from the Suffolk University website and from various periodical journals such as Foreign Affairs and International Journal.…

    • 2804 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Discuss the proposition that globalisation and European integration have eroded the sovereignty of the nation state in Europe…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The state is the most important key actor in international relations. This is because of its sovereignty that gives them authority over their own territory, its citizens and the authority over the powers delegated to international institutions. The state also has the mandate to create IGOs and set their roles. They also create international laws and norms and determine their effectiveness through their compliance or the failure to comply.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The whole system is more important than the individual state. Even though a state’s primary goal is to secure and maintain security and its national interest, but state must act and play around under international norms and regulations, which means it limits their certain interests. In reality, states tend to accumulate power such as military , economically etc in order to secure their survival, while power gives a capacity to play as equivalent on the international level. As Waltz argues that, states must rely only on themselves to avoid and protect themselves from any potential risks or threats that posed by their opponents. Yet state’s stability creates insecurity for others. Thus, it is inevitable that, states, as a defensive actors, they react to external forces and create conflicts with each other according to how the system is established or how the table is arranged. Furthermore, in terms of anarchy, he explains how the war is always possible by illustrating how external forces or situations push states in one direction or another. Nonetheless the billiard balls are same, states differ from each others in terms of its size and power. Neorealist scholars note that international politics is the structural system, thus only limited superpowers are worth to form and…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Subsidies

    • 16597 Words
    • 67 Pages

    Baragar, Jared, "Who’s to Blame?: An Analysis of Agricultural Subsidies and Their Effects on Development" (2009). Independent Study…

    • 16597 Words
    • 67 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    sovereignty of india

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This article isn't about the nuclear deal. It is about understanding the meaning of sovereignty in the 21st century. A proper understanding of the concept, without rushing to hoist the flags of nationalist hysteria, will show that much of the outrage about the 'loss of sovereignty' is quite unnecessary, and without basis. Sovereignty, defined at its simplest and most relevant to recent events, refers to the independent and absolute authority of the state. This definition implicitly accepts that it is the prerogative of each state to conduct its policies in a matter it alone deems fit. Any discerning reader would deduce from this basic definition a recipe for international chaos. The fact is we live in an interdependent, globalized world, where the actions of one state often have a bearing on the existence and well-being of others.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays