Preview

Stanley Milgram's Social Psychological Experiments

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1558 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanley Milgram's Social Psychological Experiments
In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted a series of social psychology experiments to study the conditions under which the people are obedient to authorities and personal conscience. The purpose of his experiment was to determine whether or not people were particularly obedient to the higher authority who instructed them to perform various acts even if they violate their own morals and ethics. It was one of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology as it has inspired other researchers to explore what makes people question authority and more importantly, what leads them to follow orders. There were several replications of his experiment and the results were identical to those reported by Milgram about how …show more content…
Several minutes later Lieutenant Calley returns and says “How come they aren’t dead?” The soldiers then turn to kill them although some seemed apparently uncomfortable and unwilling to do so. The situation in which the soldiers are left alone with prisoners display a similar behavior as witnessed with Why My Lai 1st semester project 46 the subject in the above mentioned experiment. After leaving the soldiers alone with the orders to “take care of them” they show subtle sympathy towards the gathered prisoners in “sparing” their lives rather than shooting them right away. This of course can be interpreted in the individual soldiers’ sense of moral ethics towards his fellow man, but under the circumstances of this specific, somewhat chaotic and brutal event one could just as much assume they are meant to kill the prisoners instead of simply guarding them. Comparing this situation with the experiment we encounter a slight problem when taking the concept of consequence into consideration. For the participant in the experiment there was no immediate consequence in not being obedient to the experimenter and raising the shock level when required. However, for the soldiers in the mentioned situation, they faced an authority figure which during the massacre was known to be life threatening towards the soldiers if they did not do what was ordered. The results of the experiment and the mentioned example differ as we look closer at a situational perspective; nonetheless we see similarities of the two when looking at the result of the given order in the absence of authority. The soldiers involved in My Lai were all part of an institution larger and more powerful than any of those used in the Milgram

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Obedience is omnipresent; it is difficult to differentiate between obedience and conformity, therefore it is a complicated subject of social psychology. However, Stanley Milgram was devoted to understand the phenomena of obedience, and created a dramatic masterpiece. Interested in many different aspects of life, Stanley Milgram was an influential key figure in psychology. However his work on the field of obedience is respected and still exiting for both psychologists and lay people. The aim of this essay is to expose the historical context of his book together with its influences, while demonstrating a deep understanding of his groundbreaking work.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because this is the challenge of human’s moral bottom lane. Back in the day, this experiment took place when the time was right after the World War II in order to find out "Was it that Eichmann and his accomplices in the Holocaust had mutual intent, in at least with regard to the goals of the Holocaust?" As a result, I would say this experiment was particularly discussing about the human’s moral bottom lane. First, I assume I was in that situation to a “teacher” I would never touch that button to shock those people. For the simple reason is that they did not do something bad to me and I need to shock them and no matter how much they will pay me to participate this experiment. According to the resources, [2] 5% of a sample average American adult men were willing to punish another person with increasingly higher voltages of electric shock all the way to the maximum (450 volts) when ordered to by an experimenter who did not possess any coercive powers to enforce his commands. When asked to predict the outcome of the obedience experiment, neither a group of Yale seniors nor a group of psychiatrists were even remotely close to predicting the actual result: Their predicted obedience rates were 1.2% and .125%, respectively. What’s more, The dramatic demonstration that people are much more prone to obey the orders of a legitimate authority than one might have expected remains an enduring insight, but one that is in need of some qualification: Milgram did indeed find drastic underestimations of full obedience (with 3% of the subjects, at the most, expected to obey), [3] but others have obtained findings suggesting that greater accuracy in predicting the outcome of an obedience experiment is possible. Milgram also showed how difficult it is for people to translate their intentions into actions even when moral principles might be at stake, and that momentary situational pressures and…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram's Obedience

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Diana Baumrind, a credited psychologist wrote, "Review of Stanley Milgram's Experiments on Obedience," while working at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California. In her review, Baumrind discusses phenomena which occurred in Milgram's Obedience Experiment. She briefly presents a case against Milgram by questioning the ethicality of Milgram's experiment. In addition, Baumrind provides excerpts of Milgram's own observations from which she deducts that Milgram seems unemotionally disturbed by his subjects’ strange reactions (Baumrind 91). She ends her review advising research psychologist to never expose subjects to indignities like those administered in Milgram’s experiment (Baumrind 94). In an article entitled, "Obedience," by Ian Parker, a British writer,…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s original study into obedience came under to a lot of scrutiny because of both mythological and ethical problems. This meant that the validity of Milgram’s study was put into question. Following the study were further investigations to see what might change and explain the results that Milgram found, both by Milgram himself and other psychologists. Variations to his study throw up interesting theories to the situational and dispositional factors that might affect levels of obedience.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Stanley Milgram 's essay Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority, the self-proclaimed "social psychologist" conducted a study while working as a psychologist at Yale University. The primary goal of Milgram 's experiment was to measure the desire of the participants to shock a learner in a controlled situation. The experiment was based on three primary roles: the authoritative figure, the learner, and the teachers. The authoritative figure instructed the teachers to shock the learner when they answered the question wrong. This form of punishment is typically believed to conflict with personal morals and the main reason for the experiment was to evaluate the teacher 's response to administering this type of punishment. For each experiment Milgram would select forty male subjects that had no prior knowledge of the study. The subjects sought for these experiments were male adults ages twenty through fifty. Not only was Milgram persistent in having a balanced age range of males for his experiment but he also made sure that they had a variety of different occupations.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram experimented with the theory that people will likely submit and follow an authority figure. He determined this from a famous experiment he conducted named the Milgram Obedience Experiment. In this test, he gathered random people and assigned them as the “teacher”, and placed them in a room with the controls for a shock machine (with various settings, from slight shock to XXX). Then he placed a confederate in a room, attached to a shock machine, who was the “student”. The “teacher” was to ask them questions and for every they got wrong, the “teacher” had to shock them, however the “student” was simply just pretending to get shocked. As the experiment continued, the “student” would begin to ask to be released or complain about…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram was a person who contributed greatly to the world of psychology by conducting an experiment, which was focused on the issue between obedience an authority figure, and the human mind's personal conscience.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miss

    • 2396 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Milgram ExperimentOne of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram (1963). Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience.…

    • 2396 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assessing Obedience

    • 1769 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Obedience is a characteristic ingrained in every person. No matter who a person is, there is always a more authoritative figure that they must obey to. Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, conducted experiments that tested obedience towards authority. These experiments were conducted in 1963 at Yale University. The experiments Milgram performed gained many different reactions from people. Two authors that wrote their thoughts on the experiments done by Milgram are Diana Baumrind and Richard Herrnstein. Diana Baumrind, who wrote the “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”, believes that the experiments Milgram conducted were not necessary and should not have been conducted unless the subject knew the harms that could occur after the experiment was done. Baumrind is a psychologist, who was employed at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, Berkley at the time that Milgram’s experiment was performed. Richard Herrnstein has a different belief. Herrnstein, the author of the article “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”, believes Milgram’s experiments were well done and show great potential of what we are able to do in the future. Milgram’s experiment is valid because it was conducted in an appropriate setting, there was minimal psychological harm done, and it contained valuable results.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stanley Milgram is a famous psychologist who focused his studies on authority and peoples reaction and obedience to it. His famous experiment and it's results were groundbreaking in psychology, surprising both psychologists and regular people alike. First I will discuss the reason for Milgrims study of obedience to authority. Then I will explain the experiment, its formulation, and its results. Finally I will cover the influence of the experiment on psychology and society.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram’s classic obedience study involved three individuals. Basically, the participant had to increase an electrical shock to another individual when a mistake was made, but was told it was a “learning experiment”. However, the individual getting shocked was not really getting shocked, but acted as if they were. This study was to see if the individual would continue to comply by increasing electrical shocks to the person making the mistakes. Most psychologists felt that a small percentage would comply and eventually refuse because the experiment is unethical. Sadly, the psychologists were wrong and 65 percent of the participants complied and increased the electrical shock to its maximum level. It was stated that some participants kept shocking…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram Research

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stanley Milgram’s (1963), Behavioral Study of Obedience measured how far a normal person go beyond their major moral character to obey authority to punish another person, and at what point would they refuse to obey and end their involvement. He selected participants for his experiment through advertisements in the newspapers. Milgram continued key to obedience had slightly nothing to do with the authority figure’s approach or style. Rather, “he argued that people follow an authority figure’s commands when that person’s authority is seen as legitimate”. J. Burger (2009). Milgram was also a teacher, in the field of Social psychology “first at Yale during the period of 1960-1963 and then at Harvard through 1963-1967) and finally at the City University of New York, (1967 thru 1984)” J Burger (20). As a teacher he was very involved up close and personal with his students. Openly praising students for their insights, oddly his tongue was sharp and cutting enough to end any…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Milgram attended highschool in the 1950s and was concerned with the possibility of another holocaust occuring in the U.S. and a Hitler-esque dictator ordering youths to do things against their personal judgement. When classmates saw this idea as ridiculous and impossible, he said “how do you know unless you were put in the situation?”. (Zimbardo, D. P. (n.d.). Stanley Millgram: Obedience to Authority, Retrieved november 3, 2013 from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9l_puxcrlM) In everyday life we obey authority and it is seen as normal. If situations arise where there is a shift in the norms of society and obeying authority means harming or killing innocent human beings, how does one know how they would react? This question obviously stayed with Milgram, and was the inspiration behind his experiment.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is The Milgram Experiment? It is one of the most famous social science studies of obedience in psychology ever conducted. This experiment was carried out by Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, in 1963. He conducted this experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience in which a large proportion of subjects complied with an experimenter’s instructions to deliver painful and potentially lethal shocks to a fellow participant. Milgram’s findings of the experiment invoked to explain atrocities ranging from the Holocaust to the torture of prisoners where individuals claimed that they were just following orders. Stanley Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the Milgram study “Obey at Any Cost” we focus on the elements of obedience in stressful times and see how it affects our judgment even if we have a moral code we live by. The experiment relies on the situation to influence people’s behavior, but how real is the situation? If it was you, surely you would understand on some level that this wasn’t real, that you weren’t really electrocuting someone, that knocking someone unconscious would not be allowed in a university study? Also, people pick up considerable nonverbal cues from each other. How good would the actors have to be in order to avoid giving away the fact they were actors? People are adept at playing along even with those situations they know in their heart-of-hearts to be fake. The more we find out about human psychology, the more we discover about the power of unconscious processes, both emotional and cognitive. These can have massive influences on our behavior without our awareness. Assuming people were not utterly convinced on an unconscious level that the experiment was for real, an alternative explanation is in order. Perhaps Milgram’s work really demonstrates the power of conformity. The pull we all feel to please the experimenter, to fit in with the situation, to do what is expected of us. While this is still a powerful interpretation from a brilliant experiment, it isn’t what Milgram was really looking for. Whether you believe the experiment shows what it purports to or not, there is no doubting that Milgram’s work was some of the most influential and impressive carried out in psychology. It is also an experiment very unlikely to be repeated nowadays because of modern ethical standards. Certainly when I first came across it, my view of human nature was changed irrevocably. Now, thinking critically, I’m not so sure but it prove it case throughout the experiment and I can agree with that.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays