Preview

Social Influence Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
408 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Social Influence Research Paper
Social Influence: How it affects people Social influence is the mark society leaves on people, however not all changed do to it. Social influence is a big part to life because of the way it affects people. One of the ways that people are affected by social influence is how they are made to think. In the video “Social Influence” Kathleen Yale demonstrates this through the Milgram’s experiment, “ If a participant hesitated . . . the researcher gave orders to make sure he continued,” (Yale). Yale elaborates on this by stating, “About two-thirds of participants ended up delivering the maximum 450 volt shock,” (Yale). Milgram's experiment was an experiment conducted to see if people would be swayed by authority, and participants were made to shock …show more content…
In the article “Monkey See, Monkey Do, Monkey Connect” Frans de Waal explains this by saying, “the herd instinct produces weird phenomena. At one zoo an entire baboon troop gathered on top of their rock …. They just kept staring at something in the distance that no one could identify,” (125 Waal). Waal further shows this copying behavior in humans when they say, “Finding himself in front of the cameras next to his pal president George W. Bush, former British prime minister Tony Blair---known to walk normally at home---would suddenly metamorphose into a distinctly un English cowboy,” (125 Waal). Given these examples one could conclude how people copy each other to fit in, and may act differently elsewhere. Although social influence has other effects that are negative or have no effect it can be positive, because of how friends reassure people of reality. In Dorothy Rowe’s article “With Friends Like These. . . “ she explains this by saying, “Friends are central to this all-important sense of validation. When a friend confirms the world as we see it, we feel safer, reassured,” (Rowe 142). This shows how the only confirmation of a person’s reality is given through someone else saying so. However, without this kind of influence many would feel lost, but with it they have meaning and a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This poses the question as to why humans are so prone to conform to situations.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clearly shown when the difference in people's malicious behavior when shocking the students in the presence of authority and when given the freedom to choose the level of shock. The thesis of Milgram's essay was that obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency; indeed, a potent impulse overriding reining ethics, sympathy and moral conduct is right on the dot. He also discusses the extreme willingness of man to obey authority at any length. This shows that "ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process." This is proven by the fact that the majority of people were willing to shock students almost to the assumed point of death when instructed to do so by a…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine yourself being shocked as an act of you incorrectly answering a question. In the Milgram Experiment, 40 men were recruited using newspaper ads in order to preform a test that would question human obedience. The question posed was: would they comply with an authority figures commands because they were stressed to, or would they comply because they thought it was the noble thing to do? The results clearly show that under authority, people will comply with what they are told to do even if they don't agree with it. Opening, obviously under certain circumstances people will change how they behave.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because this is the challenge of human’s moral bottom lane. Back in the day, this experiment took place when the time was right after the World War II in order to find out "Was it that Eichmann and his accomplices in the Holocaust had mutual intent, in at least with regard to the goals of the Holocaust?" As a result, I would say this experiment was particularly discussing about the human’s moral bottom lane. First, I assume I was in that situation to a “teacher” I would never touch that button to shock those people. For the simple reason is that they did not do something bad to me and I need to shock them and no matter how much they will pay me to participate this experiment. According to the resources, [2] 5% of a sample average American adult men were willing to punish another person with increasingly higher voltages of electric shock all the way to the maximum (450 volts) when ordered to by an experimenter who did not possess any coercive powers to enforce his commands. When asked to predict the outcome of the obedience experiment, neither a group of Yale seniors nor a group of psychiatrists were even remotely close to predicting the actual result: Their predicted obedience rates were 1.2% and .125%, respectively. What’s more, The dramatic demonstration that people are much more prone to obey the orders of a legitimate authority than one might have expected remains an enduring insight, but one that is in need of some qualification: Milgram did indeed find drastic underestimations of full obedience (with 3% of the subjects, at the most, expected to obey), [3] but others have obtained findings suggesting that greater accuracy in predicting the outcome of an obedience experiment is possible. Milgram also showed how difficult it is for people to translate their intentions into actions even when moral principles might be at stake, and that momentary situational pressures and…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Milgram's experiment, if he would have informed his participants that they were being tested on how far they would go when they were ordered to do so, even if it was against their conscience, the participants would never have gone as far as they did and the research would have been fundamentally flawed. There is no accurate way to test human nature if the participants change their behavior based on what is expected of them. "The tendency of people to portray themselves in a more favorable light than their thoughts or actions, is called socially desirable responding (Lalwani)." Socially desirable responding is one of the problems with the use of surveys, and the problem carries over to behavioral studies. If the "teachers" from Milgram's experiment had been told the real purpose of the study, they most likely would have applied far less shock, if they shocked at all because that is what is socially acceptable. No one really knows how far they will go under order until they are faced with…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A key study that has looked into research is one carried out by Milgrams in 1963. The aim of the experiment was investigate whether ordinary people will obey a legitimate authority figure even when required to injure an innocent person. Milgrams recruited 40 male participants by advertising for volunteers to take part in his study. Each participant would be paid $4.50. The experiment consisted of one ‘real’ participant and two confederates – the experimenter, who would be the authority figure, and the learner. The ‘real’ participant was asked to administer increasingly strong electric shocks to the learner each time he got a question wrong. The learner was sat in another room and gave all the wrong answer in silence until he reached 300V, he then began to pound on the walls and then gave no response to the next question. If the participant asked to stop, the experimenter would say “it's absolutely necessary that you continue” or “you have no other choice, you must go on”. Milgrams found that 65% of the participants continued to 450V, the maximum voltage. All the participants went to 300V and only 12.5% of them stopped at that point. Milgrams concluded that ordinary people are obedient to authority figures even when asked to behave in an inhuman way.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Informational Social influence is when an individual goes along with the majority because they believe that the majority is right and better informed then they are. Sherif (1935) conducted a study to test this theory in which he put the participants in a darkened room with a stationary point of light and asked them to say how much the light seemed to move and in what direction, with the participants giving their individual answers. Sherif then put them into groups of three and asked them to answer again. Sherif found that the participants changed their answer to reflect the groups as they believed the group was better informed and correct, which is an example of Informational Social Influence. However Sherif used an ambiguous test, it was impossible for Sherif to measure how far the light moved, and because it was impossible to provide a ‘correct’ answer, then it was also impossible to say for certain that the participants in the experiment had actually conformed. Also Sherif’s study lacked ecological validity as the test wouldn’t occur in everyday life and so the behaviour could be artificial.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The milgram experiment showed that our behaviors can be drastically impacted by higher-level authority factor. Several test subjects were given the authority to shock a subject when answering a question incorrectly, under the supervision of a “professional doctor”. Over time, the voltage of the shock increased as the subjects continued to answer questions incorrectly. At one point, the subject complains that the shock is too strong and that he has heart problems. At that time, the people in charge were affected by the test subjects’…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Prison Study

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Milgram experiment led to similar results, as it was designed to demonstrate the level of obedience that individuals will provide in response to who they perceive to be an authoritative figure. The study produced shocking results, indicating that 65% of people would be willing to issue at 300 volt shock to an innocent individual if they were encouraged to do so by an authoritative figure. Although the Milgram experiment was designed to produce a different type of results, both experiments were manifested as a method to depict the relationship between average human beings and authoritative figures.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    turkle

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages

    even smiled at a baby? We do it so easily, even as an infant. We copy each other all the time. Like seeing, it comes so effortlessly that we hardly think about it.” (Blackmore 34). To achieve mutual feeling in the community, people always want to alter their disfavored characteristics or adapt into the new environment. People imitate each other to fit into the society. In a group of people, one person who acts or dresses differently might easily feel left…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everybody Doing It

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This activity explores the issue of social influence—how the behavior of other people affects your behavior.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Several social situations can determine an individual’s behavior. There are phenomena that can facilitate certain behavior’s, like social loafing, groupthink, and social facilitation. These particular phenomena can have either a negative or a positive influence on an individual. We must take into account what the behavior entails and whether or not these behaviors require an intervention.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - we do not go against the group so that we are not rejected by them…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9. Provide 3 real world examples for homophily driven by social influence/contagion, and 3 real world examples for homophily driven by selection. Briefly explain your answers.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A norm is a set of rules based on socially or culturally shared beliefs of how an individual is “supposed to” behave. They regulate behaviour within a group. Conforming to group norms results in a positive and valued social identity and we receive the desired respect from others. Conformity is an indirect form of social influence that involves a change in behaviour in order to fit in with a group. The need to belong plays a strong role in the desire to conform to group norms.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays