Preview

Stanley Milgram's Obedience To Authority Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stanley Milgram's Obedience To Authority Study
Over the past century, the field of Psychology has prospered, giving way to a more in depth knowledge and understanding of people’s social interactions with one another and what drives those connections. 20th century psychologist, Stanley Milgram, executed a series of Obedience to Authority test on random participants. As seen in the YouTube videos online and in class, Milgram’s study found that over 65% of the participants carried out the experiment, despite potentially hurting someone, due to the authority figure urging them to continue.
This poses the question as to why humans are so prone to conform to situations. Social influence can be defined as a groups indirect or direct influence over another person’s decisions and behavior (Bernstein, 2014, 563). This is extremely important concept in correlation to this topic. We discussed in class that Milgram’s prompting question for this experiment was: How did the Holocaust occur? Many would say, “Well, because Hitler was a bad man.” However, Milgram realized the situation ran deeper than that, because Hitler could not commit mass genocide on his own. Instead, his used his authority to persuade Germans to take arms against Jews, relying on their desire to conform and comply (Bernstein, 2014, 564).
Also, obedience to authority is also seen in the high school social pyramid. When you are subjected
…show more content…
However, in Milgram’s experiment, people complied due to the authority figure urging them to continue and appealing to their sense of responsibility. However, this has caused many of the participants to reflect in quiet horror that they were willing to harm another by executing up to 450 volts of electricity. It is a dreadful thing to realize that humans can be so easily manipulated to participate in heinous acts, causing us to take a second look on where we stand

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Milgram Stanley, “The Perils of Obedience” Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum. 12th ed. Boston: Pearson 2013. 630-643. Print.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people would agree with doing something horrific to another person, since it is easier to conform, than to fight, people tend to protect themselves before protecting a stranger. Stanley Milgram put a study together to prove that Germans are more likely to be obedient to authority then American are. The study was called “If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You? Probably.” Milgram explains the character aspects of why people listen to authority and why they afraid not to. Social structure and the organization of society have a powerful affect on people. Milgrams set out to New Haven to start the study ad later on planed to go to Germany to do the study on the society there.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the 1960’s to the 1970’s understanding of the psychology of tyranny is dominated by classical studies. Two such studies include Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment and Milgram’s research on obedience to authority. This research has revealed that many times people obey inactively and unthinkably to both roles that authorities offer as well as orders given to them. However, recently, this belief has recently been tested by empirical work informed by social identity theorizing. What this means is that individuals’ willingness to obey and follow such authorities is conditional on the certainty that the authority is correct and the credentials of the authority.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Influencing Others: Obedience and Conformity – What factors lead us to conform and become obedient?…

    • 632 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because this is the challenge of human’s moral bottom lane. Back in the day, this experiment took place when the time was right after the World War II in order to find out "Was it that Eichmann and his accomplices in the Holocaust had mutual intent, in at least with regard to the goals of the Holocaust?" As a result, I would say this experiment was particularly discussing about the human’s moral bottom lane. First, I assume I was in that situation to a “teacher” I would never touch that button to shock those people. For the simple reason is that they did not do something bad to me and I need to shock them and no matter how much they will pay me to participate this experiment. According to the resources, [2] 5% of a sample average American adult men were willing to punish another person with increasingly higher voltages of electric shock all the way to the maximum (450 volts) when ordered to by an experimenter who did not possess any coercive powers to enforce his commands. When asked to predict the outcome of the obedience experiment, neither a group of Yale seniors nor a group of psychiatrists were even remotely close to predicting the actual result: Their predicted obedience rates were 1.2% and .125%, respectively. What’s more, The dramatic demonstration that people are much more prone to obey the orders of a legitimate authority than one might have expected remains an enduring insight, but one that is in need of some qualification: Milgram did indeed find drastic underestimations of full obedience (with 3% of the subjects, at the most, expected to obey), [3] but others have obtained findings suggesting that greater accuracy in predicting the outcome of an obedience experiment is possible. Milgram also showed how difficult it is for people to translate their intentions into actions even when moral principles might be at stake, and that momentary situational pressures and…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After killing so many people, these men claimed to simply have followed the orders of their ruler Hitler. They felt no responsibility for their actions, but not because they were evil creatures. In the Milgram Experiment, an experimenter, seated in the same room as the “student/learner”, told a willing participant to continually raise the level of electric shocks received by the student. When the participant questioned the consequences of what they were doing or if they felt like stopping; the experimenter would reply to them with ‘prods’. These ‘prods’ included: “Please continue”, “Please go on”, “The experiment requires that you go on”, “It is absolutely essential that you continue”, “You have no other choice, you must go on” (Doc. B). After , many placid prods, the experimenter was able to create their authority over the participant and student. This sense of inferiority within the participant caused several of them to continue pushing the dial even when it was clear they were causing immense “harm” to the student. Nazi soldiers who were told at a young age that Hitler has authority over them and should be listened to; did so. The results of this experiment explain why. “The physical presence of an authority figure dramatically increased compliance within participants” (Doc. B). Such as participants being watched by an authority figure caused them to comply; Nazi’s who were aware of the all seeing Hitler agreed to kill anyone so that conflict was evaded. “...Most people will obey external authority over the dictates of conscience” (Velasquez, Andre, Shanks, & Meyer, 1988). In addition, people who followed Hitler, trusted him. A factor in the Milgram experiment, that caused obedience was the belief that because Yale (a trusted institution) sponsored the study; the experiment was safe (Doc B). When the people knew a trust worthy and recognized institution was holding the…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    When individuals abandon their own freedom for the benefit of the larger group, they are no longer individuals but products of conformity. Obedience to authority can become dangerous when morals and independent thought are stifled to the point that harm is inflicted upon another person. "The Perils of Obedience" by Stanley Milgram reports on his controversial experiment that test how far individuals would go in obeying orders, even if carrying out those orders caused serious harm to others. This experiment caused a lot of controversy and one woman in particular believed that this experiment was immoral. Diana Baumrind's "Review of Stanley Milgram's Experiments on Obedience" says that Milgram "entrapped" (329) his subjects and potentionally harmed his subjects mentally. Both authors are obviously concerned with ethics and validity but both see them in a very different light, which is apparent in their writings.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, the Milgram’s study on obedience clearly showed that human were more obedient than we would image. This experiment is a wake-up call for me, for it helps me to review my own value systems and makes me aware of the destructiveness of obedience. Furthermore, the study has somehow explained how easily normal people could be influenced into supporting and participating in atrocities such as the Nazi Holocaust, the Khmer Rouge’s genocide, and the practices of ISIS on a mass scale. Any ordinary people can become an evil if obedience allows them to avoid making their own decisions as well as taking responsibility for their actions. On one hand, obedience is good when people obey the law and adhere to moral codes. It is important to…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram Essay

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted the Milgram experiment, study to see the participants' willingness to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that differed with their conscience. The study is used to show the aim that Stanley Milgram himself placed to see the willingness of the participant to obey use pain if one of the participants got an answer wrong. Overall, 65% of the participants gave shocks up to 450 volts (obeyed) and 35% stopped sometime before 450 volts. During the study many participants showed signs of nervousness and tension. Participants sweated, trembled, stuttered, bit their lips, groaned, dug fingernails into their flesh, and these were typical not…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Obedience however, is an outline of social dominion where an individual conform to orders, which are generally produced by figures of authority, and assumed the individual would have responded differently if the order was omitted. The influence may have occurred consciously, unconsciously or by direct social pressure. Individual’s often conform to achieve an impression of security in specific groups or to feel accepted. (Russell, 2011).…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Milgram’s experiment on Obedience to authority figure was a series of experiment in social psychology conducted by Stanley Milgram. The experiment measured the willingness of study participants to obey authority figure, which instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. It has been understood before this experiment that people tend to obey authority figure. Milgram’s work showed researchers the depth of this tendency and identified several of its key mechanism.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram Research

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stanley Milgram’s (1963), Behavioral Study of Obedience measured how far a normal person go beyond their major moral character to obey authority to punish another person, and at what point would they refuse to obey and end their involvement. He selected participants for his experiment through advertisements in the newspapers. Milgram continued key to obedience had slightly nothing to do with the authority figure’s approach or style. Rather, “he argued that people follow an authority figure’s commands when that person’s authority is seen as legitimate”. J. Burger (2009). Milgram was also a teacher, in the field of Social psychology “first at Yale during the period of 1960-1963 and then at Harvard through 1963-1967) and finally at the City University of New York, (1967 thru 1984)” J Burger (20). As a teacher he was very involved up close and personal with his students. Openly praising students for their insights, oddly his tongue was sharp and cutting enough to end any…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As human beings, we possess different qualities that influences the way we behave. Throughout history, psychologists performed a myriad of experiments to understand different forms of human behavior. One well known psychologist named Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment that concentrated in understanding “destructive obedience”. Milgram’s interest in researching “destructive obedience” came from the Holocaust. “Obedience is the psychological mechanism that links individual action to political purpose”. Milgram’s experiment proposed that the murder of innocent people occurred because of the obedience from the soldiers to their leader. The experiment focuses on analyzing on why the degree of obedience from each subject varies from their actions. Milgram’s experiment makes it transparent that obedience is a “determinant of behavior”.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “One of the most basic topics in social psychology is the way one agent influences the behavior of another” (Hepburn & Potter, 2011, p. 99). Self-esteem, self-identity, morals, and values can determine which people and how greatly the influence of society will be to each individual (Velden, 2007). Social pressure is shown in conformity, compliance, and obedience (Renner, Morrisey, Mae, Feldman & Majors, 2011). These pressures can influence an individual into behaviors he or she would not normally partake in. Often, the actions and behaviors people take are done to ensure acceptance and avoid exclusion (Kowalski & Westen, 2011). Social acceptance and approval is a basic human need and can exceed self-value (Kowalski…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It also shows that obedience to destructive authority has been found in the United States and in countries outside the United States. This might prove that obedience to destructive authority is a cultural universal. However, the literature review also shows that obedience to destructive authority is not an inevitable behavior connected to the survival of the human species such as eating, drinking, and learning, but rather it is a social construct. In other words, obedience to destructive authority is influenced by the values, symbols, and behaviors of a society. Thus, if authority respects the rules, roles, and values of the society/group in which the authority exists, obedience is considered an acceptable act; even obedience to destructive authority is…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays