Preview

Smoking Should Be Banned In The Workplace

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
280 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Smoking Should Be Banned In The Workplace
I believe smoking should be banned inside and outside of workplaces, due to the Worksafe health and safety procedures and wellbeing for fellow employees, customers and the general public.

Work safe health and safety requirements require smokers to smoke at least 5 meters from any business or undercover areas including schools, kindergartens/daycare's etc. I believe this is important to promote to the outer community for safety of others who do not smoke, who could have breathing problems such as asthma and to not have it as an influence around teenagers and young children.

Banning smoking from the workplace means a cleaner and more approachable environment for all to enter. It also means that less breaks will be required during shifts for employees, because they won't be needed extra breaks for smokes in between their work. Banning smoking for employees in the workplace is also more hygienic because it doesn't leave a 'smokers' smell on the employees uniform therefore leaving a smell wherever they pass.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Let me briefly explain a bit farther my thoughts concerning this subject. Smoking is not inherently wrong, one has the right to smoke but when that right to smoke can adversely affect another especially their health then it should be controlled. Understandable, employees that work in a bar inherently take on reasonable risks in the performance of their duties, but should they be needlessly subjected to cancer causing agents like tobacco and second hand smoke? I say…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ban on Hiring Smokers

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe there shouldn’t be a ban on hiring smokers because if you really think about it majority of today’s society does smoke. There will be many places that would be underemployed because there won’t be enough people out there to hire because they smoke. If they want to smoke there needs to be a designated place for them to smoke and they either A need to bring a change of clothes to smoke in or B just don’t smoke while working. The change of clothes could be used because the smell of the smoke stays in the clothes and say they are taking care of a patient who has asthma, well the smoke smell on the clothes wouldn’t be good for the patients and there is nothing that covers up the smell of smoke once on your clothes or in your hair. So therefore I think there should not be a ban on hiring smokers.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerianpaper

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Smoking cigarettes can cause lung problems. Both first-hand and second-hand smokers are affected by cigarette smoke. Scientific findings and researches show that the chemicals in cigarettes, apart from the smoke, can lead to health problems such as lung cancer. Smoking cigarettes should be banned in public places. In public places, more people, both young and old, can be exposed to the smoke from cigarettes. My position differs from those who might say that smoking altogether should not be banned. My position is that smoking in public places should be banned. It does not include smoking in private places like homes. Smoking in public places should be banned because it poses health risks to individuals who are non-smokers and who do not want to inhale the fumes from cigarettes. The risks are double to those who already have lung ailments.…

    • 577 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As is the case with OSHA, employees have the right to a safe and healthy workplace. Since smoking impedes on that right, I do believe that employers have the right to ban or restrict employee smoking at the workplace. Second hand smoke is a serious issue, one that is often overlooked by smokers. Nonsmokers have the right to not be exposed to something that they choose not to engage in. It is unfair for employees to be exposed to health risks that they are not personally subjecting themselves to. Additionally, there is some responsibility on the workplace to ensure that added level of a safe and healthy environment. Since exposure to smoke is a health hazard, choosing to restrict or ban it cannot be seen as a violation of personal rights.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Substance abuse

    • 974 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since people smoke everyday they bring their nasty habit to work you can smell it on their clothes and when you walk outside for a break. Every workplace is entitled to have a smoke free workplace for their employees. This rule is existence with state and local governments. Some benefits to keep the workplace smoke free would be they would not be exposed to it at work. Smokers that are willing have a better chance at trying to quit will have an easy chance by not breathing it and wanting a cigarette each time. The employer may have the healthcare costs reduced which shows that the company cares. The employee may less likely to miss work because of smoke related illnesses. The office equipment will last longer such as the carpet and furniture. Here is a brief policy for companies to go by to make sure their workplace is smoke free. No smoking of tobacco products of any kind. The manager has the final say on the designated smoking area outside of the building. This designated area will remain 20 feet form the entrance. All materials used including cigarette butts and…

    • 974 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Smoking may reduce one’s smoking excessively because he or she will not be able to smoke as much as they used to and start to reduce their tobacco addiction. Because of this possibility, people would go extra miles just to get satisfied of their addiction, no matter how much will it cost for them. For being said, individuals have much more chances of quitting if they were given lesser opportunity to smoke. There is nicotine in every cigarette that an individual cannot resist. The power of that nicotine is so addictive that only few got a chance to quit successfully.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Would You Do ?

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As indicated by your board member, costs are driving the trend not to hire smokers. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, a smoker costs about $4,000 more a year to employ because of increased health-care costs and lost productivity. Breaking that down, a smoker will have 50 percent higher absenteeism, and, when present, will work 39 fewer minutes per day because of smoke breaks, which leads to 1,817 lost hours of annual productivity. A smoker will have higher accident rates, cause $1,000 a year in property damage (from cigarette burns and smoke damage), and will cost up to $5,000 more a year for annual insurance premiums. John Banzhaf, executive director of an antismoking group in Washington, and a law professor at George…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It has become fashionable in the world today to condemn smoking. Smoking should be banned because it destroys people’s health, finances and families.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In turn, may cause the company to suffer layoffs furthering its negative reputation. Looking at both sides of the spectrum, I can understand why a company would want to forbid smokers from joining their workforce. They cost the company in health care expenses, they have higher absenteeism, decrease in productivity due to breaks and their smoking residues may discomfort patients (Noe et al., 191). Though these are all valid reason to rid smoking from the organization, I don’t believe having a policy which forbids these individuals to work will provide the greatest good. This policy blocks talent and ability from entering the company. These workers with special abilities are the ones who can save lives and make a breakthrough in clinical research. Having this type of skill on board helps the most people and this should be what companies look at. Yes, saving money is important, but if they want to save money they can do this through other means and not put patients health at risk. A company could save money developing a policy which states no breaks can be taken for smoking, or better yet, they could ban smoking at the…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    tikunia

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cigarettes have long been known to cause cancer, lung diseases, and other related illnesses, but until recently, only minor steps have been taken to prevent this pernicious habit from reaching those who do not smoke. The government is strongly considering a ban on smoking in the work place. Offices, restaurants, sporting events, casinos, bars, and even construction sites are included in this definition of "work place."…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We decided to research this topic because the number of smokers is rising every year and everywhere around the world. Also smoking can effect to your health and people around you.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smoking Is Bad

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Smoking is a practice in which a substance, most commonly tobacco or cannabis, is burned and the smoke is tasted or inhaled. The most common method of smoking today is through cigarettes, primarily industrially manufactured but also hand-rolled from loose tobacco and rolling paper. Today we are more aware about how bad smoking is for our health. Smoking should be banned or restricted in almost all public places because it has been shown to be dangerous to health, it can reduced athletic performance and it can lead to bad skin, bad breath and bad-smelling clothes and hair.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Smoking Be Illegal

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Smoking should be illegal in the United States. Not only is smoking annoying for non-smokers, but it carries many big problems with it. Smoking should be banned because of the environment and economic factors, health risks and the negative effects it has on nonsmoker and children.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I’d like to first say that I am a very happy non – smoker. I don’t wish to offend anyone here but just to inform you of what I believe is something that we all should know about thoroughly. If we don’t know the effects and dangers properly we will do serious damage not just to ourselves but to everyone around us. And I'm almost positive that you have heard that before but personally I think you should hear that as much as possible. Smoking should be banned in public places. Smoking has many reasons to be banned.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. First of all, smoking is bad for our health. Banding smoking from public places should be enforced throughout the whole United States. Here are three reasons why smoking should be banned. Cigarette smoke is very harmful to non-smokers. Smoking in front of young people is a bad influence on them. Office buildings and homes have caught on fire from someone smoking inside. Smoking can cost you problem in the future; you would probably end up getting cancer.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays