Preview

Should The Government Be Able To Regulate The Internet?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
797 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The Government Be Able To Regulate The Internet?
" No one owns the internet, but people have their personal accounts and information stored in it. I believe that the government - federal, state and local levels - should not be able to regulate the internet, social media and be able to read our emails. However, they are allowed to monitor internet activities in order to be able to recognize and neutralize any potential threats to themselves or the country, but so long it does not violate the fourth amendment of no unreasonable searches or violation of privacy. This continues to keep the privacy of US citizens following the protective amendments while giving the different levels of government some benefits to help prevent future problems. At the local level, a county government would limit …show more content…
Such as, in Reno v. ACLU, the state government of New York tried to pass an act that restricted the transmission of obscene and inappropriate material to protect the community and children from seeing such things. However, the case had made its way up to the Supreme Court in a battle over whether or not this act was in violation of the 1st amendment. The verdict was that the act passed did violate the 1st amendment, saying that it was limiting the freedom of speech. With this in mind, the state government should only be able to view social media and the online activities that people partake in, because if they try to control it they will most likely end up violating some amendment and having the law retracted. So there is no reason to waste the time of creating a law and voting on it just so it is retracted a year later. A benefit with viewing the social media throughout the state, they are able to see what is going on throughout the state, and from there they can do what they can to help that area, all without controlling …show more content…
The government should not end Net Neutrality because it will allow many large companies to be able to analyze and manipulate the data we send and have online through the internet. They would be able to view emails we send, see videos we watched, hear or see phone calls we make or see anything we do on social media. The government should not pass this because it violates the fourth amendment of the Constitution, which states that the United States prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, and the large companies would be unreasonably searching through all of our private information and data. Therefore, the federal government should have enough control of the internet so that the people are not worried about their information being randomly searched and their privacy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article entitled, This is why the government should never control the internet, former commissioner at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Robert M.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the recent expansions in the availability of technology, the ability to access information has become increasingly more common. This ability to search for information and view content through the internet is currently protected in the United States under a set of laws that are commonly referred to as Net Neutrality regulations. Although many people are unaware of what the concept of net neutrality is, it is understood that the results of any change to current internet regulations would affect have long-lasting effects on all internet users. “Net Neutrality” is a concept that was defined and popularized by Tim Wu, a legal scholar and net neutrality advocate, as being, “the idea that any network traffic… can move from one place to any other place without discrimination” (Lohr 1). Recently, this equal access to content has come under attack by certain groups that would stand to profit from the removal of current net neutrality regulations, such as internet service providers…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Lin Ray, net neutrality means no bit of information should be prioritized over another (“VCU Blog”, 2014). The origin of information doesn’t matter. Due to net neutrality, there are no restrictions on the internet currently. In other words, we can have free communication. The entire source of the internet is freely available for normal web users. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality Rules

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (Finley, K 2015). Dozen of Internet Service Providers, including the big companies like, Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon are against Net Neutrality because they say that the rules are too restrictive. Net Neutrality will prevent ISP's from doing what they want with all the content and traffic that they deliver. Internet Service Providers also claim Net Neutrality will hinder investment and innovation.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net neutrality is the idea that all content on the internet should be treated equally (Schewick, 2009). This means that ISP’s cannot discriminate against content by slowing down content they do not agree with or charging internet companies more to have certain content delivered faster (Schewick, 2009). Net neutrality has been the unspoken standard since the creation of the internet. This is because, when the internet was first created, ISP’s did not have the technology to determine which content was going through their network (Schewick, 2009). Since then, technology has improved and ISP’s now have the ability to determine which content is going through their network and effect its delivery to the end user (Schewick, 2009).…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    America is currently under a very big threat to our nation’s freedom. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is currently in the process of debating whether or not to end net neutrality. Back in 2010 the FCC made a decision to enforce net neutrality, which would require all ISPs, also known as Internet Service Providers, to treat all lawful internet traffic equally. This requirement helps maintain an open and free internet, but in January of 2014 the DC Circuit struck down the FCC’s previous decision because they claimed that “the agency had unreasonably interpreted sections of the Communications Act and had regulated broadband providers as…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 2010, it became legal for the National Security Agency (NSA) to access private email logs, social media accounts and other internet databases (Risen & Poitras, "N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens). Risen and Poitras (2013) explain that the intention of this change was to help protect the United States (U.S.) from future terrorist attacks and was for the general purpose of national safety. It is unclear how many terrorist attacks all of this new intelligence has actually prevented, however, it is very clear that the NSA’s actions are violating the privacy of not only American citizens, but everyone who lives on American soil. With the internet as a resource, this means that they can not only listen in to conversations, but access virtually any data that is entered via the internet. This includes credit card numbers, GPS coordinates, flight destinations, contact information for family members, personal pictures and much more. The NSA not only violates the constitutional rights of American citizens, it puts everyone in the country at great personal risk for crimes such as fraud and discrimination.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The government should continue regulations and keep control over net neutrality. Net Neutrality greatly benefits the people of the internet. The current regulations allow people to be free online. They are able to express their opinions and feelings with a free, uncensored internet. With net neutrality, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are not allowed to censor and control what people see on the internet, meaning that manipulation and bias is not possible on the internet.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a person uses the internet their information is stored by their service provider, this raised questions as to Forth Amendment rights of the user. The Supreme Court has held that the Fourth Amendment does not protect information held by third parties, such as internet service providers (ISP), as illustrated in Smith v. Maryland in which the issue was if the installation and use of a pen register constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. Another issue is, since internet service providers (ISP) are third-party entities the government can obtain a court order to obtain the information it seeks. This is important under the Fourth Amendment as this amendment allows the government to issue a grand jury subpoena compelling the disclosure of information and property, even that protected by “reasonable expectation of privacy.” If the third-party is in possession of the materials, the government may subpoena the materials from the third-party without obtaining a warrant. The third reason is that the ISP provider is usually a private entity, under the private search doctrine, the Fourth Amendment is “wholly inapplicable to a search or seizure, even an unreasonable one, affected by a private individual not acting as an agent of the Government or with the participation or knowledge of any Government…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the law of online privacy in the past twelve months [2002] have involved the government 's response to the reality…

    • 3371 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If we can not depend on the government to attempt to protect all of our rights, including the rights to privacy they will not be able to depend on the members of the community. If the laws are shaped to balance the safety of the public against modern technological devices then enforced the public would feel more at ease with all the ways technology is being used today.…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How involved should the Government be when it comes to regulation of the Internet? There are many different issues regarding internet regulation. Should Internet users be responsible for controlling how they use the Internet? Since the internet has been introduced to Americans there have been many debates on how involved the Government should be in regulating topics such as violent games, gambling, and sexual content.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This makes us more prone to hacker attacks, identity thefts, and privacy right violations. A person might enjoy getting information on websites, and increasing their security on privacy. The reality is that the NSA is the one creating the same software’s meant to protect our privacy. Therefore is it not easy for them to decode these same software’s meant to keep us safe. It is true that terrorists use websites and Tele-Communication to recruit and attack, but does that make it right for government agencies to abuse the Patriot Act, and the Fourth Amendment? Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, High-five, and other forms of social networks privacy terms are virtually non existent. “Facebook and other networks do agree that on their privacy terms to use your information for marketing and Intelligence gathering purposes” Erick Montero. This means that if a certain company wanted to find out how many people like its products, movies, shows or other things, Facebook would allow it to have access to it, for certain amount cash. So the next time you click I agree, make sure to deeply think about it. Our Fourth Amendment gives us the right to not accept unlawful search seizers and in an extent the right to privacy in a persons own car, home, or property. This Amendment is no longer in existence with the rise of police brutality, backed by the city the work for. “So long as you are seen as a threat, the fourth doesn’t apply to you” Erick…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Technology will not eliminate the need for government, order is needed to keep everyone in line and technology cannot enforce that, whereas the government can. Without the government the world would be an insane place and people would be allowed to do whatever they pleased. By this occurring there would be people running around creating chaos everywhere, even if all people were to given a device that was protective, it would not keep everyone safe from all that. The creators might say it will ensure safety for everyone every day, but there is not a way the devices can be monitored every hour of the day. Government is needed to enforce the law, technology cannot be used to do so, humans listen to other humans it is the nature of live.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays