Preview

NSA: National Security or National Stalkers?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1348 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
NSA: National Security or National Stalkers?
NSA: National Security or National Stalkers?
In 2010, it became legal for the National Security Agency (NSA) to access private email logs, social media accounts and other internet databases (Risen & Poitras, "N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens). Risen and Poitras (2013) explain that the intention of this change was to help protect the United States (U.S.) from future terrorist attacks and was for the general purpose of national safety. It is unclear how many terrorist attacks all of this new intelligence has actually prevented, however, it is very clear that the NSA’s actions are violating the privacy of not only American citizens, but everyone who lives on American soil. With the internet as a resource, this means that they can not only listen in to conversations, but access virtually any data that is entered via the internet. This includes credit card numbers, GPS coordinates, flight destinations, contact information for family members, personal pictures and much more. The NSA not only violates the constitutional rights of American citizens, it puts everyone in the country at great personal risk for crimes such as fraud and discrimination.
One of the greatest issues with the access the NSA has is that it violates the constitutional privacy laws. The fourth amendment to the Bill of Rights, protects the American people “...against unreasonable searches… but upon probable cause…” ("The Bill of Rights: A Transcription"). Risen and Poitras (2013) reveal that the NSA is not even required to check that the individuals they gather information about are foreigners or have anything to do with foreign relations. This extensive access to all personal data including bank accounts, GPS coordinates and insurance information is the definition of an unreasonable search without probable cause. Everyone’s information is collected and stored before there is any reason for the government to search for it. This is in direct violation of the people’s



Cited: "The Bill of Rights: A Transcription." National Archives and Records Administration. National Archives and Records Administration. Web. 31 Aug. 2014. . "The Constitution." The Constitution. Web. 01 Sept. 2014. . "Jon Stewart Slams Obama 's Domestic Spying Program." YouTube. YouTube. Web. 01 Sept. 2014. . "The NSA 's New Spy Facilities Are 7 Times Bigger Than the Pentagon." Defense One. Web. 02 Sept. 2014. . Risen, James, and Laura Poitras. "N.S.A. Gathers Data on Social Connections of U.S. Citizens." The New York Times. The New York Times, 28 Sept. 2013. Web. 02 Sept. 2014. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The thoughts of those looking into the affairs of the NSA think the government took a great idea, and honestly the only idea with today’s technological warfare, and got greedy with how much information they have collected and need to be watched very carefully. The most important information for any human being is the information we choose to keep private, it can be the most devastating information in the wrong hands and the United States Government is holding that exact information in bulk, with your name on a yellow folder.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    citizens, and the government would have too much capability to go behind our backs, unnecessarily, and spy on us. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has freely admitted that it has not launched or found any extensive cases through the Patriot Act’s privileges. (Ybarra, n.d.) The question is, though, if they can not find any cases of terrorism, smuggling, or organized crimes what are they doing? The Government is spying on us through every piece of technology that we own. They can find us within the blink of an eye through our cell phones, computers, and bluetooth devices. They can hack into any of our Facebook accounts, emails, internet search browsers. They can view a person through their phone or computer's camera without them even knowing. The government can also turn on your microphones through the same devices and listen to you and what you are doing at any moment. The National Security Agency has put its codes into Android's operating systems, hacking into three quarters of the world's smartphones. (Tyler Durden, July 9th,…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main articles focused on this weekend was that of the American government spying on some of it’s closest allies. The United States National Security Agency has been under fire lately for it’s spying on some of the United…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The NSA infiltrating the United States citizen's technology such as cell phones and computers is unjustified because there are no filters for the NSA or knowledge of their investigation taking place. For example "In his interview with RT, Binney emphasized that the FBI does not filter email messages but obtains and stores all of a person's e-mails, and when he or she becomes a target, their entire records are extracted and analyzed for the desired information" (NSA Whistleblower). Coming up with filtering processes would allow them to save time and filter out the non-terrorist threats. Many people make mistakes under pressure, knowing the National Security Agency is hunting you down is tons of pressure ask Osama bin…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concerns of and further decreased in 2013, when leaks of information of the NSA spying and disturbing privacy of U.S. citizens became publicly known. The NSA’s acts go against the fourth amendment, thus showing the amendment is no longer in full effect, causing citizens to believe the amendment will soon be completely repealed removing the remaining privacy citizens have and further violate their rights. A great number of the general public disapprove of the government collecting data on U.S. citizens.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Considering the point of whether amendments protecting us from the government is just a huge illusion, I believe this statement to be true to a certain extent. Yes, especially with privacy, the NSA has violated our personal…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consider the technology that defines everyday life in America- texts, email, internet, and phone calls. In performing these constant activities, most never questioned their privacy, that is, until Edward Snowden squealed on the NSA’s less than ethical maneuvers. Without citizens’ consent, the American government was collecting metadata, “all the information surround a call, including the caller’s number, the receiver's number, the time and location of the call, and how long it lasted” (Diamond). The government may have been shooting for just the bad guys, but all American civilians got caught in the crossfire. Nothing would exempt a person from these invasions of privacy, and their data would be scanned and stored just like that of a seasoned…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA leaked

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Eight months later, media outlets around the world have published more than 100 revelations in over a dozen languages. We now know that the NSA has tracked private American citizens’ phone calls, emails and social connections; monitored Internet traffic in and out of the U.S.; and spied on allied countries and foreign companies alike. What we have learned so far suggests that the agency has gone from protecting national security to facilitating the United States’ political and economic advantage on the world stage.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriot Act Errorism

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    That is why so many Americans oppose the Patriot Act. In the article “ With or Without the Patriot Act, Here’s How the NSA Can Still Spy on Americans” by Jason M. Breslow tells how the government can still access private information without the Patriot Act. In 2008, congress passed an amendment called FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) amendment. The amendment states that the government has authority to access popular Internet sites and collect communications of users. The amendment is geared towards non-citizens of the U.S., but the program can pick up communications between citizens and non-citizens living the U.S.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Obama on Mass Government Surveillance, Then and Now, it states that while Obama was a senator he says "that means no more illegal wiretapping of American citizens...no more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient." (Breslow) Obama then has his administration "collect indiscriminately and in bulk --- regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing." (Breslow) For those who follow anyone against national security needs to really consider whether or not they are doing so because the person is well-known and influential, or because they actually believe in their rights. Obama does not act as a…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the attacks on the date of 9/11, Congress passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act made the government’s ability to spy on individuals easier, but also weakened the checks and balances our country relies on. So in essence, the threat of terrorism against our country paved the way for violating one of our basic civil liberties under the fourth amendment of the constitution – the ability to live free of unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the ability for government agencies to obtain information quickly and without warning becomes a powerful tool against terrorism.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot Act and this cannot be put into effect unless we are in a time of war, and place of war. The NDAA leaves the United States as a “space of varying terroristic activity” and a “field of war on terror” therefore, the NDAA and Patriot act are effective laws. But what does the NDAA achieve to the idea of Domestic Surveillance? Well, since the United States is now a “area of conflict” it puts us in jeopardy of becoming domestic terrorists for particularly contentious reasons as these. But, are we domestic terrorists? Some of us, maybe, but is it appropriate to punish us all as a whole? There is no reason that should be put into action the way it has been. The NDAA is a blatant act of piracy invasion, even police brutality in some sorts. One thing is that it is all happening so quickly it is scary, is it not? (PcQuanda.com)…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Willis, Clyde E. Student 's Guide to Landmark Congressional Laws on the First Amendment. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2002.…

    • 3643 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However the U. S. Constitution contains no actual right to privacy. The constitution only protects certain aspects of the individual.In the constitution certain amendments state only some things to be private not all. Some examples being, officials not being able to search your home without probable cause and no government involvement in making personal decisions. There is no actual right to overall privacy so the NSA has a right to go through different forms of communications in order to keep the people…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978 which prohibited electronic surveillance in the United States without proper warrants. The National Security Agency (NSA) wiretapping program contradicts this by allowing the NSA to conduct electronic surveillance without a warrant (“NSA”). Prior to the War on Terror, the government was allowed to secretly wiretap Americans and access their electronics with a judge's order due to FISA. After the attacks of September 11th, Congress allowed wiretapping without a specific judge's orders or even probable cause. Due to the Patriot Act, an act as a result from 9/11, the FBI could demand information from phone companies, internet service providers, banks, and even the U.S. Postal service without any court order as well (“Costs”). The Patriot Act is still to this day one of the most controversial acts in American history. This act is constantly criticized and makes people feel as if their freedom has been violated. People also feel as if it is very unnecessary because the only person that has ever been arrested due to this act was a taxi driver who tried to donate money to al-Qaeda…

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays