Preview

Should Obama Send More Troops To Iraq?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1380 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Obama Send More Troops To Iraq?
Should the US concern about the fight against ISIS? How much should the US spend on this war? Should Obama send more troops to Iraq? What should be the US military role in this war? Are ISIS a real threaten for the United States of America? These are some of the many questions, about the US foreign policy, debated among many families, veterans or senators in the United States of America. Although there are some important events taking place in the US now, such as the new immigration law presented by Obama last month, the ObamaCare Health Plans, or the Republicans victory in the last midterm elections in November; the constant fight against Islamic terrorist groups is always a big issue in the US foreign policy and a big concern for the US society. …show more content…
In the George W. Bush administration, the US foreign policy deployed and invested a huge amount of military and money in the Iraq War. But when Obama arrived to the Government of the United States of America, the foreign policy of the US turned around and he promised: “On my first day in office, I would give the military a new mission: ending this war”. He accomplished his promise at the beginning when he brought back the last troop from Afghanistan in December, 2011. But due to the growth of this dangerous group and the threat that this suppose for the US, Obama saw himself forced to start thinking about taking action again in Iraq and …show more content…
After the Democrats’ lost in the midterm elections on the 4th of November, Obama announced the resignation of the Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel . Obama’s foreign policy has been very changeable in his time as President of the US. He has changed his objectives, his actions and even his Secretary of Defense a lot of times. Ashton Carter will be the 5th one in his 6 years as President of the US. This is an example of the constant changes in Obama’s foreign policy strategy and the complex relationship with the Pentagon and the military establishment. Obama arrived with the idea of ending the wars and all his plans have changed. Chuck Hagel’s resignation is the clearest sign of change in Obama’s foreign policy. He was chosen to organize the military withdrawal from the Middle East and to reduce the military budget. Now that Obama’s foreign policy has different objectives for his last two years as President of the US, he needs someone to organize the offensive against the Islamic State. The new Secretary of Defense will be Ashton Carter if the Senate confirms him in January. A Senate that will be controlled by the Republican Party after the victory in the midterm elections in November. If confirmed, Ashton Carter’s mission is to help the President to design a military strategy against the jihadists of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. The Senate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is a lot of debate right now as to if the United States should go back to war with Iraq. Both sides of this debate, the people that are for going back to war and the people who are totally against it, have legitimate points” pro” and “con”. However, a lot of the people that are” Pro” engaging in war with Iraq again do not realize the underlining issues which exist. The United States just got out of a war with Iraq which brings up a lot of questions if we should go back or not. There are a few questions that most people do not sit down and truly think fully about.…

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    C200 Exam

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. In President Obama’s speech at West Point, he announced that 30,000 additional troops would be sent to Afghanistan. He made this decision because he said it was vital to the United States’ national interest. The vital national interest at risk in President Obama’s address is the security and safety of the American people as well as the “security of our allies and the common security of the world.” By involving the military and increasing the troop strength, President Obama can achieve the objectives of his strategy. His objectives are to keep the Taliban from becoming powerful, prevent them from government rule, improve Afghanistan security forces and government so they can manage their own country and prevent Al Qaeda from establishing refuge in other countries. If you follow the framework of several important U.S. documents, such as the National Defense Strategy (NDS) and Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) they will outline this same strategy. The National Defense Strategy states that it is the responsibility of the military to protect ourselves and our allies from attack. It states that the military should help protect and secure our vital interests abroad. U.S. security is linked with the security of the international community. The physical integrity of our country is protected by the military through multiple security controls. One of these security controls is through deployments of the armed forces. The Quadrennial Defense Review states the mission of the U.S. military is to protect the American people and advance our nation’s interests. The vital interests of the United States are intertwined with the integrity and resilience of allies abroad. Our vital interests are security, prosperity, broad respect for universal values and an international order that promotes cooperation among our allies. The President’s vision is to become more powerful domestically while bringing together all elements of national power. We need to help our neighbors…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war in Afghanistan started after the September 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States while President Bush was in office. President Obama was inaugurated as president on January 20th, 2009 and he picked up in the middle of a long war in Iraq and Afghanistan. After taking office, General Stanley McChrystal was selected to command NATO operations in Afghanistan. McChrystal submits a detailed report, to then Defense Secretary Robert Gates, calling for a surge of 30,000 – 40,000 troops in Afghanistan. The general’s assessment reflects the “Polis Model” in that he writes “success demands a comprehensive counterinsurgency (COIN) campaign” and further writes “failure to gain the initiative”, “risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible”. This assessment gives the portrayal that increasing the troop count in Afghanistan is the only feasible option and that any other method would result in failure. To make matters worse, McChrystal’s 66 page assessment…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States has been at war since its creation in 1776. It has battled confrontation 222 out of 239 years, just about 93% of its continuance. Notably, one of the most crucial wars is the “War on Terror”. Beginning in March of 2003, this war initially served the purpose of getting rid of the country’s leader Saddam Hussein to prevent his use of suspected stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. While this war was strategically justified the real war between Iraq and the U.S. began long before what is officially recognized. The United States of America should not have invaded Iraq as it promoted the illegal exercise of government power and democracy, encouraged continuous genocide and violence, and empowered an extreme capitalist regime.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American international relations are extremely scattered, and when examined can be interpreted in many different ways. This may be because there is perhaps a blend of these major schools of American foreign policy in all of our international relations. The major schools that will be used as lenses are isolationism, liberal internationalism, Kissingerian realism, democratic globalism, and democratic realism. I am going to use these lenses to examine how the liberation in Iraq was handled, and what foreign policy was mainly used.…

    • 2543 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iraq is seen as Texan President George W. Bush’s war, although he saw himself fulfilling the stated goal (Iraq Regime Change) of his predecessors George H. W. Bush and Clinton. The excuse for major combat operations in Vietnam was a perceived attack on the Gulf of Tonkin. The excuse for major combat operations in Iraq was a perceived attack on the Persian Gulf. Elected on a promise to end the war in Vietnam, Nixon expanded it into Laos and Cambodia. During the midterm election, Bush learned that the voters wanted to end the War in Iraq, but instead, he sent more troops. President Johnson left Vietnam unresolved for his successor, Nixon, who had no connection to his administration; President Bush left Iraq unresolved for his successor, Obama, who also had no connection to his…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Billie

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages

    At the start of the twenty-first century, the United States engaged in two military interventions, the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and the invasion of Iraq in 2003. What were supposed to be short, sharp wars dragged the US into the long and failed missions of reconstructing the Afghan and Iraqi states. Today, 97% of Afghanistan’s licit GDP is derived from foreign aid and efforts to guarantee stability are still being undermined by the Taliban-led insurgency. In fragile, conflict-driven Iraq, the population constantly struggles with ongoing water shortages, electricity scarcity and a broken economy. Given the immense costs of the two invasions, it is paramount to ask how it all could go so wrong. Focusing on the period of the Bush administration, this essay seeks to answer why the US under-estimated the difficulties in bringing order and development to Afghanistan and Iraq.…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States needs to bring the troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan. Their reasons for being at war are invalid because American company in the foreign countries is insubstantial; the U.S. government cannot afford the continuous costs of war, and has lost sight of aims. It is time to bring our forces home.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Obama Necessary

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    George W. Bush decided to find the people responsible for the attacks, but in the process, he not only sent troops to Afghanistan to look for the leader of Al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, but he also sent troops to Iraq to finish what Bush’s father never finished back in the Gulf War which was to catch Saddam Hussein. Bush achieved that but there were still American troops there even after the capture of Hussein. When Obama was elected president, one of his goals was to remove troops out Iraq and to also end the war on terror. The first troops to withdraw were the ones in Iraq, when he was was first elected in 2009, he wanted 30,000 to 50,000 troops withdrawn from Iraq by 2010 (“Withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq”). By 2011 though, all troops were withdrawn from a war that was extremely unpopular. The war on terror was still a factor that concerned American citizens, as a result when Obama became president, he sent 30,000 troops to fight in the war in Afghanistan. In May of 2011, Osama bin Laden was killed in his compound in Pakistan. After the killing, bin Laden was thrown into the Arabian Sea within 24 hours (“Death of Osama bin Laden Fast Facts”). President Obama called it “the most significant achievement to date in our nation’s effort to defeat al Qaeda. Of course after the murder of bin Laden, he withdrew troops from Afghanistan. It did of course make that group significantly weaker, but three years later, a new group started to rise, ISIS. Late in Obama’s presidency, ISIS became a powerful extremist group in the Middle East through videotaped executions and even Terrorist Attacks like the Paris, Nice, and Brussels Attacks. The United States and other countries have targeted ISIS with 8,216 airstrikes since November 16, 2015 according to the Pentagon (Fantz). The responsibility of what to do with ISIS should be up to the next president’s job due to the fact that Obama’s…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Homeland Defense History

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The current foreign policy topic and homeland defense have continually become more intertwined since the end of WWII and the Cold War. Prior to WWII the United States had more of a national security mindset and wanted to remain out of many foreign relations. After the attack on Pearl Harbor the United States entered WWII in both theaters and changed the U.S. stance on how we engaged in foreign relations. The Cold War placed an emphasis on homeland defense because of the international threats made viable by the communist expansion and the Soviet Union. Foreign policy was one of the major factors that ultimately ended the Cold War and provided a sense of a more effective national security climate in the United States. After the terrorist…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Isis Informative Speech

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unfortunately, we are having a struggle at this moment with Isis. We have been seeing people kill, beheaded also people killing for religion.I been seeing articles also social media talking about how could we deal with Isis. Social media says let’s throw nuclear misuse or let’s throw the atomic bomb and finish everyone for the better. Here come articles saying should we go to war with Isis? To be talking about Isis There's going to be three main topics that I will be talking about. One is what do you think about what Donald Trump said or what should Barack Obama do about Isis? Second, should we send soldiers to fight or throw nuclear bombs and possibility a atomic bomb? Third and last what is the Isis main goal.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    War on Iraq- Stillman

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “The Decision to go to war with Iraq” (Pfiffner, 2009) is an analysis of the factors that led G. W. Bush and his administration to invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam Hussein and his government. Pfiffner provides a short historic background explaining the reasons this decision was made. According to his essay these reasons relate closely to the G. H. W. Bush administration that in the 1990s decided against invading Iraq and overthrowing Hussein. Public officers, who were assigned in critical positions during the G. W. Bush administration, such as Rumsfield, Wolfowitz and Perle, were pushing a war agenda convinced that Iraq posed a major threat to the United States, previously during the Clinton administration (Pfiffner, 2009).…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wounded War Veterans

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Iraq war has ended as of December 2011. Osama Bin Laden has been killed as of May 2011 and yet the war in Afghanistan is still ongoing. The jihadist terrorism threat that our nation once feared from Al-Qaeda has diminished. Many question the justification of the United State’s involvement in the Middle East over the past decade. What have our intentions been this whole time and have the lives of those brave military men and women lost been worth the fight?…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The year of 2014 has proven to be that no president gets a free pass when it comes to difficult international decisions. Over the last term and a half, the Obama administration really has been picking up the disruptions of the Middle East right where Bush left them while simultaneously being dealt with more issues of diplomacy. The occurrences involving Ukraine and Syria have, in opinion, shown the current administrations true colors. It is the prime example of the realism ideology and the contrast between “hard” and “soft” power. In both situations, Obama has shown great reluctance in putting to use the American military. Although tens of thousands Syrians have been murdered and Ukraine has been under direct attack from Russia, present administration has moved from the “hard power” that killed Osama bin Laden and essentially ended the war in Iraq to a potential isolationist. However, as some could argue, like Stephan M. Walt, “foreign policy is not philanthropy.” Unless allies have direct benefits for the United States, perhaps the nation has no business jumping to the rescue (Walt). In other words, America is once again bringing focus back to the home front and has the potential of taking a more realist approach to foreign policy than ever before. If the nation truly does not want to look out for the interest of fellow democratic states simply because it…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL114 Essay

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Terrorism is an inevitable threat to the maintenance of a state’s security and order in the global system. Obama emphasizes the issue of terrorism in his speech and gives an insight on how American leadership handles terrorism. To begin with, Obama begins his speech by talking about the attacks on 9/11 and acknowledges that counterterrorism using military intervention had decimated Al Qaeda’s leadership between the border of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Obama commends the elimination of Osama bin Laden and applauds the American military. Realists argue that military power is an important factor in determining a state’s power and security, and through the lens of…

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays