Stephanie Sturgill submitted the article “Should student athletes get paid?” to break down both sides of the argument that was evolving in the sports world today. She described how both the pros and the cons would have a direct effect on the student athletes within these universities. Within Sturgill’s article her facts about the topic at hand are very clear. She lets you see both sides of the argument no matter your view on the debate.
In my opinion this was a well written article because it let you see how compensating the student athletes would have a large effect on the student’s finishing school, with point shaving, and finding alternate ways to earn money. Sturgill used a survey that was ran at an unknown Division I university, showing how the study proved that the student body was willing to go up on their tuition to help compensate revenue for the athletes (Schneider, 2001). With this study I went and read into Schneider’s basic intent for running this research. By involving this research into her article she pointed out a main aspect of the pros side of debate. With this, it indicates that the compensation can be seen as an incentive from their fellow student body as a thank you gift.
The second reference that Sturgill used was not a really an important key one she used. Even though the point she was bringing across with the student athletes that they were being exploited was important. She could have elaborated on the Schneider study a little more or added another source to cite to back up Martin’s point a view a little more. Martin was just showing how even though NCAA had passed the law to let athletes work, it still didn’t compensate for the time or the money to the student during their season. With this there wasn’t any research done here to back up the data that Martin had collected, other than the NCAA passing that law. I feel as though Sturgill could have added something else to Martin’s review to push that side of the debate little more.
Within the article Sturgill has key points she brings to the table but really doesn’t have information to back up the points. For example; the point she made about the walk-on student athletes at the universities. Walk-on athletes sometimes generate to be one of the schools top players in one of the top sports. Comparing the walk-on’s to the athletes that’s on scholarship can’t be done. This walk-on athlete is paying for tution, books, housing, and food by themselves or through financial aid. Compared to an athlete that on scholarship and has all of the incentives taken care of. But on hand, you have your star player “The Walk-on” on the universities flyers, media guides, billboards, and sometimes on the video game covers. That player isn’t reaping any of the benefits that the university might be gaining from these advertisements but they’re still in my opinion exploiting the athlete by making money off of the athlete.
My overall view of her discussion on the topic “Should student athletes get paid?” still stands as in between. Before reading the article I was going back and forth on my views. Martin points out a good point on how the schools generate revenue off of their top athletes and the athletes never get a chance to see the funds they help bring into the university. Basically, the schools are using the athletes to gain funds for the institution but they are not considerably reimbursing or showing their appreciation to their athletes in a semi-equal fashion.
References
Martin, M. (2002, August 20). “NCAA limitations placed upon scholarship allocation hurt sports.” The Lantern. Retrieved April 21, 2008, from http://media.www.thelantern.com/media/storage/paper333/news/2002/08/20/Sports/Ncaa-Limitations.Placed.Upon.Scholarship.Allocation.Hurt.Sports-261460-page2.shtml Schneider, R. G. (2001). College students’ perceptions on the payment of intercollegiate student-athletes: Statistical data included. College Student Journal, Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mim0FCR/is235/ai77399630/pg_6
References: Martin, M. (2002, August 20). “NCAA limitations placed upon scholarship allocation hurt sports.” The Lantern. Retrieved April 21, 2008, from http://media.www.thelantern.com/media/storage/paper333/news/2002/08/20/Sports/Ncaa-Limitations.Placed.Upon.Scholarship.Allocation.Hurt.Sports-261460-page2.shtml Schneider, R. G. (2001). College students’ perceptions on the payment of intercollegiate student-athletes: Statistical data included. College Student Journal, Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mim0FCR/is235/ai77399630/pg_6
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
“The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million,” (Mitchell & Edelman). The money collected by the NCAA, goes towards the sports and the programs, not the players themselves, however, the NCAA says that “Student-athletes are at the heart of the NCAA’s mission,” (NCAA). “Some athletes and their supporters believe that college athletes deserve some type of financial payment for their services and contributions to their institutions, an opinion that has lead to player-initiated lawsuits, court cases, and strikes,” (Garcia).…
- 1189 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In the article “Here’s Why We Shouldn’t Pay College Athletes” by John Thelin, it discusses the topic of paying collegiate athletes getting paid. Thelin takes the position that college athletes should not be getting paid. Thelin does agree with scholarships. During the article Thelin explains why college players shouldn’t be getting paid, using numbers that show if they were to legally get paid they would end up only making in the hundreds of dollars and would cost more to the school than just giving scholarships. I agreed with “Here’s Why We Shouldn’t Pay College Athletes” because it benefits no one even the players.…
- 560 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“...Is money such a big problem for these student-athletes? Don't they receive scholarships? How much more money do they need?” Most college athletes received scholarships to play for the college they’re going to. They should not receive money for going to school and choosing to play a sport that they don’t have to do. Sports is always an option, no one has to play and no coach is going to force a student to play a sport and maybe cause a distraction from doing their school work.…
- 307 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The author has fully comprehended his topic. He understands the pros and cons of paying the athletes, and compares the two different sides. For example, one of his opposing viewpoints was that, " the student-athletes make schools millions of dollars, yet receive no cut of the profit". This pro statement is then countered…
- 504 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
On average, annually D1 Colleges are earning 50 million dollars across all sports in the schools. All of the D1 schools are making a great deal of money off these stellar athletes and they are receiving very minimal in return. On the other hand, if D1 colleges decide to pay their athletes how could this affect the other programs in the school? This is where the discourse begins on whether we should pay the college athletes, or is a scholarship more than content for the student. As a result of this dispute it can cause humongous outrages from angry parents and fans of certain teams.…
- 704 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this scholarly article, Haden introduces his views on the exploitation and unfair compensation of student-athletes by the NCAA. Student-athletes receive absolutely no monetary compensation whatsoever; Hayden proposes a solution to this issue. Haden makes an excellent case stating, “each division I university incorporate “laundry money” into the scholarships of all their student-athletes” (680). The article explains that the best way to compensate student-athletes is to incorporate the use of laundry money into the student-athletes scholarship packages. By doing so, there are not any complications with NCAA rules and regulations therefore, making his article extremely beneficial to my topic. Haden’s views and proposed solution is very helpful for my topic because it has not appeared in any other text I have read. For this reason, he has helped me better understand my issue while also supporting the idea that student-athletes should be compensated for all of their time and effort dedicated to the…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“Fairness, academics and equitable competition” is the mission statement for the National Collegiate Athletic Association. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, also known as the NCAA, is an association that regulates major areas of college athletics for members and student athletes. The organization is defined as a non-profit, and as proclaimed by the president Dr. Mark A. Emmert, “…is committed to providing opportunity for more than 430,000 college students who compete annually in intercollegiate athletics” (NCAA). Recently the NCAA published their financial report for the 2011-2012 fiscal years. The report features a pie chart displaying a revenue breakdown, and distribution of revenue breakdown. I will examine the economic impact in these categories and consider how a possible change in distribution of the revenue to players affects the NCAA purpose and amateurism of the sport.…
- 804 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Texas universities like Texas State are recognized through their sport rankings and their star athletes’ performance on the field. The role athletes play in the production of profit from merchandise, ticket sales, and advertising has created the question: Should athletes get paid? Based out of “Student athletes deserve payment in multimillion-dollar industry”, published in the University Star, as the main text describes the reasons why athletes should be paid. The editorial staff argues about the profit the NCAA makes, how athletic scholarships work, and how some athletes come from low income families with the hopes of building better lives for themselves and their families. Readers can use “Student athletes deserve a piece of the pie, too”…
- 1560 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Given that this article is for paying student athletes there is going to be confirmation bias which I will have to keep in mind when presenting my information. The overall goal of the source is to give reasoning to why student athletes deserve to be paid.…
- 502 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Corruption, scandals, suspensions, firings and a systems that is systematically flawed all the while the fact of the matter is that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is a organization that is bringing in billions of dollars each year yet the labor force generating the money gets a scholarship that many athletes believe doesn’t pay enough for everything that is needed on campus so this leads the author to have to take a look at if athletes need to be paid. I will outline numerous problems that are going on in college athletics and possible solutions to problems. I will take a look at the scholarship itself to determine if that is sufficient enough for campus life. The bottom line is from the outside looking in is that there is a lot money going into the hands of administrators and coach’s with none going into the people shedding the blood sweat and tears. It would seem that the system in place at times, wants to make the student athlete stand around with their hands out accepting all and any money that they can find from an outside source, which is in violation of NCAA bylaws concerning amateur sports.…
- 4235 Words
- 17 Pages
Better Essays -
Throughout the years, many colleges have dealt with much controversy over whether or not athletes should be paid additionally to play sports in college. There are strong arguments supporting both sides of this issue. I believe there is validity for both sides of this argument. However, through research I have done it is my belief that it is dangerous to pay college athletes in addition to their scholarships. Paying college athletes would be harmful for everyone involved, especially for the student athletes themselves.…
- 772 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The complexity of these arguments proves little hope of a simple solution. The NY Times Upfront article “Should College Athletes Be Paid?” poses two fantastic arguments; “yes” says Joe Nocera, author of Indentured: The Inside Story of the Rebellion Against the NCAA, and “no” says Bob Williams, Sr. Vice President of Communications a NCAA. Although Mr. Nocera makes the valid point of how much revenue college athletes earn for their schools, Williams states how college salary would end the focus of academics for athletes, as well as sparking a controversial new “industry” in…
- 478 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Student athletes should be compensated for their work, as they are the sole reason for the Athletic Program’s surplus in revenue. These athletes are working for the schools and are doing a service to the college that seems to go unnoticed. Colleges are using these athletes to boost their respective reputations and bring in revenue while not compensating these athletes for their work. Everywhere else athletes are paid, so why shouldn’t college students too? Some critics may argue that these student-athletes are amateurs, and if paid then are becoming professional athletes. The minor league for baseball could be considered an amateur sport, although they do receive pay according to the team’s revenue.…
- 872 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
College athletes should receive a moderate amount of stipend for their hard work. They put their time and effort with many practices and games, furthermore, paying for their extra traveling expenses. College athletes should have an allowance because they contribute and perform very hard as a team with hundreds of hours of practice and games, sustain their grades, while jerseys, merchandise, and appearances in video games does not implement any compensation towards them. However there is a society of people who disagree because becoming a college athlete can present you phenomenal and remarkable scholarships as well as opportunities and for those experiences why should they be compensated more?…
- 476 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
College athletes are working more than 40 hours a week on their bodies and intelligence. While the average collegiate student just worries about their classes, student- athletes have 6 a.m. workouts, attend class after, and then right back to the grind to further and groom their athletic ability to stand out on game days. With all the hardwork and dedication these athletes show, they should at least get some compensation for their duties. In the end student-athletes in college are actually athlete-students. “All the hours of work an athlete puts in throughout the day and attending meetings and meetings while juggling class in between can be very stressful! It takes a lot to be able to pull that off, especially doing all that on few hours of sleep and rest” (Chavanelle 1). It is quite noticeable that most student-athletes at varying universities do not have time for a job, because they are working full-time as a student-athlete already. So what will cover all the out of pocket expenses there are or how will athletes get rewarded for their will and dedication? This is another reason student-athletes should get compensated for what they go through and…
- 836 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays