Preview

Short Summary Of Amistad By David Pesci

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
436 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Short Summary Of Amistad By David Pesci
Imagine being plucked out of your everyday life and taken to a foreign land where you know you will spend the rest of your life doing a terrible job.#18 Amistad, the book by David Pesci, is a gruesome but true story that follows that narrative through the journey of illegally bought slaves on their odyssey from Africa through Cuba to America. In the spring of 1839 Singbe, Grabeau, and other tribesmen living in the heart of Africa were living their normal lives when they were captured and put on a ship. Life on the ship was gruesome slaves were given “Bastinados” often, given barely enough food and water to survive, and forced to stay in the ship's hold for hours at a time. The ship arrived in Cuba and the slaves were placed in barracoons these …show more content…
Singbe a rice farmer from the Mende tribe was tired of these ships and needed to escape. One night he escaped his chains and found a bundle of machetes and the slaves murdered nearly all the crew members. They then attempted to convince the remaining crew members with broken english from Bellywah to sail them back to Africa but the crewmembers Pepe Ruiz and Pedro Montes had other ideas. During the day Pepe would sail straight to Africa but at night he would turn the ship around and sail back to Connecticut where he believed he could bring justice to the escaped slaves and return his cargo to Havana. When the slaves landed they were quickly apprehended by slave patrol and a Court case was amuck to decide what would happen to the newcomers. With the rising issue of slavery between the north and south of the U.S. the case was gaining more publicity and it was tearing the nation apart. The slaveholders looked like they were gaining leverage in the case stating the slaves were only cargo and should automatically be returned to their homeland. But the tides turned when the slaves had sued the slave owners for “unruly living

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Amistad Questions

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    England had abolished slavery at this point making it illegal to take slaves from West Africa…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It started when the court decided that all blacks could never become citizens of the United States. The people in the case was Dred Scott a slave who lived in Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving to Missouri the slave state…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Amistad Case Study

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In this legal study, the case of United States v. Libellants and Claimants of the Schooner Amistad, 40 U.S. 518 will be examined in relation to a supreme court precedent in the freeing of slaves in the American North . The date of the Supreme Court trial was 1841. The initial location of the Amistad trial began in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in Hartford, Connecticut, but was eventually tried in Washington D.C. in the U.S. Supreme Court. The liberation of illegally kidnapped slaves was a major shift in the Northern cause for the abolition of slavery in the 1840s. Slavery, after all, was still legal in the U.S., but the Supreme Court Chief justice Joseph Story defined illegality of the kidnapping of the slaves…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The State of Louisiana began before Judge John Howard Ferguson in the state criminal district court. It had been only four months that Ferguson was serving for New Orleans when Plessy case came in front of him. The defense were not wanting to win in the at the local court, and also expected to lose appeal to the Louisiana Supreme Court, as they wanted to take their case to the US Supreme Court, and spread the message of opposing Segregation across the whole nation. Lawyers from both the sides had given the concise information about the case to Judge Ferguson, and now at the court the lawyers would present the arguments on that in front of Ferguson and he will decide and announce that should the case go to trial or if it should be sent away. Defense advocate James C. Walker claimed that Plessy’s imprisonment offended his constitutional rights, especially Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment rights.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority opinion stated that because of Dred Scott’s race he was not a citizen and had no right to sue under the Constitution, in March of 1857. Stretching beyond the case of the moment, the court’s decision also invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that had for nearly 40 years placed restrictions on slavery north of the parallel 36 degrees, 30 minutes, in the vast territory of the Louisiana Purchase. Scott’s abolitionist lawyers might have hoped for a landmark decision but not the one they got. The Supreme Court’s ruling galvanized the abolition movement and spurred Abraham Lincoln to publicly speak out against it, the event that led to the resurgence of his personal political career.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Amistad case was a long and hard road. Many members of the Mendi tribe were kidnapped by Spaniards and sold into slavery. They faced cruelty, sickness, and death. The road to freedom was a long and hard one. The Mendi tribe never gave in, and never gave up on trying to be free, independent…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talks about the significance and background of the Dred Scott case. In fact this actually hurt the cause of anti-slavery because now, slavery could spread into the free states. Now, the free states laws that used to create this safe haven for the fugitive slaves, now no longer have any power because the Constitution, debatably the strongest document the United States has, contradicts any law protecting slaves. This is because the United States Constitution protects all property of the individual, and slaves to the southern people in the 1850’s thought of slaves as property.…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The closeness of the place, and the heat of the climate, added to the number in the ship, which was so crowded that each had scarcely room to turn himself, almost suffocated us.” (p.171) The extreme lack of room just described is only one of the terrible conditions in which slaves were kept in transport; just like barn animals would be kept. These people were truly treated like garbage and were extremely disrespected as basic human beings. In fact, “Estimates for the total number of Africans imported to the New World by the slave trade range from 25 million to 50 million; of these, perhaps as many as half died at sea during the Middle Passage experience.”…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Decision Essay

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1847, a slave named Dred Scott tried suing for his freedom. Under Missouri law, any slave owner who traveled through Free states with their slave, was instantly emancipating them and it could not be reversed. Having lived in Free states for extended periods of time with his former owner, Dred Scott had the right to sue for his freedom and shouldn’t have had any problem getting it. After rising to the Supreme Court in 1857, his freedom was denied. The denial of freedom wasn’t what angered most people. It was the specific opinion of Chief Justice Roger Taney that was considered majority opinion. Seven of the justices, including Taney, were pro-slavery. Taney’s opinion didn’t just relate to Dred Scott specifically. Taney stated that the founders of the nation did not consider black Americans, free or not, to be citizens and they had no rights under the constitution, especially not the right to bring suit in federal court. He believed that all slaves were considered property, therefore he was never free even though he resided in Free states. He said that denying an owner of their property, such as a slave, would violate part of the Fifth Amendment. He also ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional because Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories. Since the final decision of this court case was highly anticipated,…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, a slave named Dred Scott went to the north with his owner. While the two men got to the north the Scott’s owner died. From this Scott looked at himself as a free man. He even sued for freedom. He argued that if is owner died in a free territory that would make him a free man. Scott went to the Supreme Court to defend his freedom. The court ruled seven to two that Dred Scott was not a free man and he had to return to slavery. Scott grew with anger and still believed he should be free. The court’s decision was final and Scott was later forced back into slavery. During the Dred Scott case Chief Justice ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and he decided to abolish it.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dbq Civil War

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This portion of the act was proposed to appeal to the liking of the south. Although it may have appealed to the south it also stirred feelings in the north. The laws were not practical as they violated the slaves 6th amendment right to a trial by jury, also the slaves could not testify of their own behalf. Angered by this many states passes personal liberty laws which prohibit the imprisonment of the runaway slaves and permitted them a trial by jury. The push for the rights for African Americans and slaves as a whole led to an abolitionist movement to be sparked throughout the united states that opened up many northerners and southerners eyes to the harsh realities of slaver and how morally wrong it was. As these abolitionist feelings intensified so did the dispute over whether or not slavery should be allowed in the disputed territories of present day Kansa and Nebraska that were supposed to be settled in the compromise of…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the time around the dred scott cases slavery was banned in some states via the missouri compromise. Dred Scott had been living in along with his family had lived in a U.S territory where slavery was banned. Scott argued that since he had lived in that territory for a while that he and his family should have ultimately been granted freedom. Dred Scott also tried to sue for the wages that had been held from him while the case had been in motion which ended in the court ruling in favor of John Sanford.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It angered free states as it made it a federal responsibility to return fugitive slaves to their owners, and made it a felony to interfere. In addition, it denied the fugitive’s right to a jury trial, instead instituting special commissioners who would be paid more for “returned” slaves, than if alleged fugitives were released. This opened the door for free people of color to be captured and sent to the South, and with no legal way, or right to plead their case, they were defenseless.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Segregation Wrong

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This explains that they were not equal and the blacks liberties and rights were being taken away from them. It also shows that they were being unfair towards the blacks and that whites weren’t the only ones that matter. All in all they were able to see that they were being unfair to the people of color and that it was wrong to treat people like they're not even…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays