Preview

Dbq Civil War

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1673 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dbq Civil War
The United States as a whole was divided before the Civil War, over the dispute of whether slavery should be allowed or not after the Mexican American war ended in 1848. After the Mexican American war citizens of the North and the South began to dispute the issue of slavery and tensions started to rise. There were many things proposed that were proposed to help the dispute over slavery such as the Wilmot Provisio which would close off California, Utah and New Mexico off from slavery. However it was not approved by the Senate as well, the South did not agree with the provisio as they feared that it would shift the balance of the power in the north. The Civil war was an inevitable fate that not only the North and the South had to face but the …show more content…
This portion of the act was proposed to appeal to the liking of the south. Although it may have appealed to the south it also stirred feelings in the north. The laws were not practical as they violated the slaves 6th amendment right to a trial by jury, also the slaves could not testify of their own behalf. Angered by this many states passes personal liberty laws which prohibit the imprisonment of the runaway slaves and permitted them a trial by jury. The push for the rights for African Americans and slaves as a whole led to an abolitionist movement to be sparked throughout the united states that opened up many northerners and southerners eyes to the harsh realities of slaver and how morally wrong it was. As these abolitionist feelings intensified so did the dispute over whether or not slavery should be allowed in the disputed territories of present day Kansa and Nebraska that were supposed to be settled in the compromise of …show more content…
Stephan Douglas who proposed the Kansas and Nebraska act in 1854 thought that popular sovereignty should settle the dispute over whether or not slavery should be allowed in the Nebraska territory. However with the compromise of 36° 30' the territory was legally closed to slavery. To settle this Douglas voughed to repeal the Missouri Compromise line and establish popular sovereignty as the means of how the territories settle their issue on slavery. Not every one agreed on this issue. Parts of the North saw the act as a plan to turn the territories directly into slave states, and this therefore made them very weary and spiteful. This over all ill natured feeling spilled over into the population as the fate of Kansas hung in the balance after the act became a law in May of
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Caning of Charles Sumnner
    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Caning of Charles Sumnner

    destroying the efforts of slave owners to take over the federal government and ensure the survival of slavery. Three days prior to Mr. Brooks’ visit, Mr. Sumner had delivered a speech in response to the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, a bill written by two proslavery southern senators, Andrew Butler and Stephen Douglass. Both Andrew Butler and Stephen Douglass were southern democrats who defended slavery. The passage of the Kansas-Nebraska act enraged Senators and Congressman from the northern part of the Union because it allowed both the Kansa and Nebraska territories to vote whether to enter the Union as…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Post Civil War
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dbq Post Civil War

    Prosperous businessmen had immense influence and control over the post-Civil War economy and business in the United States. Even though large corporations led to the decrease in food, fuel, and lighting prices as illustrated in Document A, there were many small businesses and laborers who were left without jobs due to the dishonesty and domination from these large business owners. Document C describes how the manufacturing system has taken away the individualism and uniqueness of the workers craftsmanship. The worker is stuck doing one particular task until it is exhausted and that is the only trade skill they are left with. The system offers the hard worker no freedom or opportunity for advancement keeping them stagnant and stuck in the same place. The new manufacturing system brought about homogeneity and essentially destroyed uniqueness. For example, Henry Ford, the automobile tycoon, used the assembly line technique effectively in order to produce more cars at a cheaper price, which made them more cost effective. But in retrospect, the assembly line destroyed the pride men took in their work. The hours were growing longer, and the workers were bored and worn out. The people resented the long hard hours for little pay. This is what brought about the formation of labor unions. The workers way of fighting back and trying to change the rights of the people was the creation of a new political party and labor unions.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq
    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kansas Nebraska Act Dbq

    The Kansas- Nebraska Act was proposed by Stephen Douglas in 1854. This Act stated that the territory of Nebraska would be split into two separate territories, Nebraska and Kansas. It also stated the people could vote on whether the territories would have slavery. This Act caused a large controversy between the people in the North and the South of the United States.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Civil War End Slavery
    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The Civil War End Slavery

    The Civil War That Ended Slavery The United States civil war began in April 1861 pitting the Northern states (Union States) against the Confederacy States (Southern States). The main duel was fueled primarily by differences between the two parties on the idea of slavery and secondarily on trade, tariffs, and states rights. Therefore, in fighting, the first aim was first to stop secession of the southern states in order to preserve the union.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act During The Civil War
    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act During The Civil War

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act set the stage for what began “Bleeding Kansas” and ultimately the Civil War. As settlers began moving west of the Mississippi River, they moved into the area which is present-day Nebraska. Since the area was not yet a structured state, the people could not live there. The area that was wanted was located in a part of the United States that had outlawed slavery due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This, in turn, caused representatives in Congress to have no interest in creating a Nebraska territory. Senator Stephen A. Douglas was the driving factor behind the Kansas-Nebraska Act. With the goal in mind that Nebraska would become a territory, the Kansas- Nebraska Act would allow each territory the ability to choose whether or not they supported slavery. With this being enacted, it was a direct violation of the Missouri Compromise. The bill that allowed territories to decide for or against slavery, also known as popular sovereignty, split the Whig party into two different groups; the northern Whigs and the southern Whigs with the northerners organizing the Republican Party.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act
    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    The Kansas-Nebraska act was a proposal by Sen. Stephen A. Douglas which said that Kansas and Nebraska territory could be allowed to govern for itself whether or not to be a slave state or a free state. By a vote of its residents the territories would become a slave or a free state.This caused many fights between Northerners and Southerners. As a result many people were killed.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 7
    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dbq 7

    When the Compromise of 1850 was made, the South wasn’t very fond of the idea. “If the agitation goes on, the same force, acting with increased intensity, as has been shown, will finally snap every cord, when nothing will be left to bind the States together except force.” (Document A) This shows the North’s control of the government and constant pressure on the South for their beliefs. Also it shows that if nothing is done to relieve the constantly growing pressure on the country, that it will fall apart. If the North continues to fail to form some sort of measures to please the South, the Union will not stay together. The North was also not happy with a lot of the compromises that were made and benefitted the South. One of these was the Fugitive Slave Law. They believed that the law was immoral and shouldn’t be followed. The North believe the law was “suicidal,” and that “the Union is at an end as soon as an immoral law is enacted.” (Document B) They thought that if this law were to be effective it would destroy the Union. There was very much discontentment within the states. So much that at one point, a man was beaten unconscious with a cane after delivering a speech to the House. (Document F) The people of the South did not agree with the North on many…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tensions Between The Anti-Slavery And Prevention Of The Civil War
    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tensions Between The Anti-Slavery And Prevention Of The Civil War

    "From 1861 and 1865 the United States engaged in a civil war. Tensions between the Anti-Slavery Northern states and the pro-slavery Southern states erupted into a Civil War after the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860. " The divided states, that of the North and South, fought against each other, to finally end the dispute whether to accept or abolish slavery. Abraham Lincoln was the leader for the North side and Stonewall Jackson was the leader for the South.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In what ways and to what extent did constitutional and social developments between 1860 and 1877 amount to a revolution?
    • 546 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In what ways and to what extent did constitutional and social developments between 1860 and 1877 amount to a revolution?

    The Civil War lasted four years, from April of 1861 to April of 1865. It physically separated the nation into two, in which the South seceded from the North. The two sides fought for the struggle over slavery - the South was for it, while the North was against it. The South argued that the North was attempting to limit their rights given to them by the Constitution; their rights to exercise those powers were restrained heavily by the politically dominant North. The North at first made a statement stating that the main purpose of the war was to maintain the Union and to keep the South from breaking apart. However, as the war went on, Lincoln found fighting for these terms was impossible; he knew that the slaves had to be freed. This decision to abolish slavery stirred up controversy in the Union, for many white men, while they opposed slavery, did not like the idea that they were fighting for African-Americans. Many riots erupted from many Union states come draft day, clearly showing the unsettlement and dissatisfaction that Americans had with the idea of freeing slaves. The North not only had to deal with the South, but also with themselves.…

    • 546 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise
    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Missouri Compromise

    The Missouri Compromise was implicitly repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, submitted to Congress by Stephen A. Douglas in January 1854. The Act opened Kansas Territory and Nebraska Territory to slavery and future admission of slave states by allowing white male settlers in those territories to determine through "popular sovereignty" whether they would allow slavery within each territory. Thus, the Kansas-Nebraska Act effectively undermined the prohibition on slavery in territory north of 36°30′ latitude which had been established by the Missouri Compromise. This change was viewed by Free Soilers and many abolitionist Northerners as an aggressive, expansionist maneuver by the slave-owning South, and led to the creation of the Republican Party.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Sectionalism
    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Civil War Sectionalism

    America was a divided nation during the Civil War, starting in 1861 and ending in 1865, the battles were fought on Northern and Southern lands. The Union was faced with eleven states in the South for secession, who wanted nothing more than to be disconnected from the United States. This war was fueled by many disputes, sectionalism being the leading cause. Sectionalism within the United States hindered unity within the country due to expansion issues and conflicting views on slavery.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act
    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was a controversial legislation that opened Kansas and Nebraska to white settlement, repealed the Compromise of 1850, and led opponents to form the Republican party. This piece of legislation was introduced in Congress that revived the issues of the expansion of slavery. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of measures passed by Congress to resolve sectional tensions. Congress admitted California to the Union as a free state. And organize the territories of New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah without mention of slavery. It also paid Texan $10 million to relinquish land claims in New Mexico and abolished the slave trade in the District of Columbia (but not slavery) while enacted a law requiring the return of fugitive slaves. (Martin 369)Douglas who pushed the Compromise of 1850, and then stated he “would never make a speech of slavery again” also proposed that the area west of Iowa and Missouri (which was set aside as permanent Indian reservation) be organized as the Nebraska territory to white settlers. Since Nebraska was located in the northern half of the…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Controversy Before the Civil War
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Controversy Before the Civil War

    During the expansion westward of United States, controversy between the Northern and the Southern States quickly arose. This was primarily due to the disagreement of what these new western territories would become- free or slave states. The Southern States wanted these new territories to support slavery so they could send more pro-slavery senators/ representatives to Congress, which was the opposite for the Northern States. Many important events from 1845-1861 quickly led to the start of the Civil War due to these Northern and Southern disputes.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The events that led up to the Civil War.
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The events that led up to the Civil War.

    Conflicts widened between the North and the South as two sides collided in every event before the Civil War. The North and the South were very different in many ways. They were known as two different countries because of their cultural and economic differences. The disagreements between the North and the South aggravated the separation that was soon to follow. When the North gained the control of the government, the South seceded.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Manifest Destiny Definition Essay
    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Manifest Destiny Definition Essay

    The Kansas-Nebrask Act was an 1854 a bill that mandated "popular sovereignty" -giving settlers the choice to decide whether slavery would be allowed or not. Making each state a pro-slavery state or an anti-slavery state. The pro-slavery and anti-slavery states later caused huge peridos of viloence in the time line like the Bleeding Kansas, and was a major part in the reason the…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics