Preview

Second Dialogue Between Philonous And Hylas

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
226 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Second Dialogue Between Philonous And Hylas
In the Second Dialogue between Philonous and Hylas, Philonous defends his philosophy that there is no such thing as matter and concludes that God is the ultimate cause of all our ideas. However, I have different opinions on Philonous’ claim that all ideas come from God. Philonous concludes that since our sensations come to us without us willing it to, we are the ones that causes those sensations. Thus, there must be some other being that controls our sensations. Philonous then assumes that one being is God and that God is necessary for anyone to perceive anything. From here, I disagree that there necessitates a God in order for anyone to perceive anything. Just because our sensations come to us involuntarily, it does not mean that someone
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    • Explain Anselm's Ontological Argument (25 Marks)
    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • Explain Anselm's Ontological Argument (25 Marks)

    Anselm put forward his ideas about the existence of God through his book, the Proslogion. He started by simply giving the word ‘God’ a definition, and then explaining that to not believe in God was absurd. The Proslogion consisted of two main parts. In Proslogion 1, Anselm explained God as being…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Monologue Of Spartan Prolougue
    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Monologue Of Spartan Prolougue

    Prolougue Long Ago There was ------“I.Do. Not. Trust. You…”“Noted” -A…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Dialogues Between Hylas And Philonous Summary
    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Three Dialogues Between Hylas And Philonous Summary

    For example, if one agrees to meet one's friend in two hours, then that friend mysteriously appears at the right place at the right time, even though that friend was not actually "real" insofar as one did not perceive him at the time that the plans were being made. In order to address this issue, Berkeley introduces the concept of the mind of God. As Philonus says: "Don't I acknowledge a twofold state of things, the one copied or natural, the other copied-from and eternal? The former was created in time; the latter existed from everlasting in the mind of God" (58). This means that the basic consistency of the "external" world can be accounted for by the fact that there is always a perceiver present within any given situation—and that perceiver would be God.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    New Testament and Worldview Assignment Angela
    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    New Testament and Worldview Assignment Angela

    Part Two: the Question of Origin: God has created all things (Gen. 1:1). “God is the first cause” (Weider & Gutierrez, 2011, p. 56) in creation, meaning He initiated the Ex Nihilo process of creation. Jesus Christ has created everything and is, and will always be, the sustainer of life (Colossians 1:16-17).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument Analysis

    The answer has to be ‘A God who cannot be thought of as not existing’. So that, Anselm argued in his book Proslogion, proves logically that God’s existence is necessary. “There is no doubt that there exists a being than which nothing greater can be conceived”, this is simply saying that no one can think of anything greater than God and therefore God is the greatest possible…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro And Socrates: An Analysis
    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Euthyphro And Socrates: An Analysis

    In the reading Euthyphro, it is an argument between Euthyphro (the priest) and Socrates (who is being indicted by another man). This reading is a dialogue between the two men arguing on the same topic, even though they each gave examples, they still can’t figure out the answer but going “around and around” with the original question. Since Euthyphro and Socrates gave a lot of examples during the argument, I was really confused when reading it. I couldn’t organize my thoughts on the reading. However with the example of Euthyphro persecuting his own father for “murdering” a drunk murder, I start to have an idea of what they are arguing about, in my opinion, it is a question with no right answer for. No matter which answer was given, the result…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Code Of Hammurabi Essay
    • 2635 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Code Of Hammurabi Essay

    Early Greek philosophy attempted to explain the universe on the basis of unifying principles. P80…

    • 2635 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Annotated In 'The Speech Of Callicles'
    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Annotated In 'The Speech Of Callicles'

    After reading "The Speech of Callicles" I noticed that Philosophers were not what I originally thought they were. I have always pictured them being men who were ahead of there time. Who were searching for the answers to life. In the first paragraph these beliefs I once had about philosophy were changed. Callicles states that Philosophers would get into pointless arguments about the problems of everyday life rather than look for the truth. They would also attempt to make a man who doesn't study philosophy but studies practical affairs second guess himself. No matter what side of the argument the man would speak about the philosopher would take the other side. The distinction made in paragraph one is that nature and custom are antagonistic to each other. Nature being the order and behavior of all living things that make up the universe, and custom meaning the everyday habits that have fallen upon society. I feel that they are…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Psyc 4100
    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Psyc 4100

    I shared with him the metaphysical doctrine of ideas, or preferably of forms as the unadulterated substance of reality. It was clear that he took umbrage when he dared to counter and insist that perception does a perfect work in bringing one closer to the state of knowledge. I was at that time compelled to present a strong argument for his pleasure so I began to speak rather earnestly. “Do you not possess a soul my brother? It is there that ideas rest forever in eternity, even permeating the universe and the God who is in command of it (Hunt, 2013). I continued to question him when I inquired as to how material objects can possibly achieve the like. I continued my verbal onslaught by stating: “Our souls partake of those eternal ideas; we bring them with us when we are born. When we see objects in the material world, we…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philosophy C100 Quiz 1&2
    • 1582 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Philosophy C100 Quiz 1&2

    8. The philosopher who introduced Philosophy to Athens and who introduced the "mind/matter" distinction was…

    • 1582 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous
    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page

    Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous

    Philonous, in Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous, attacks Hylas arguments toward the distinction between primary and secondary qualities. The distinction between primary and secondary qualities is a peculiarity between qualities which depend for their existence on the relation between an object and a perceptual device. An example of this would be smell and color, which has properties that an object has independently of any perceiver.…

    • 314 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explanation Of Philonous Argument Of Hylas
    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explanation Of Philonous Argument Of Hylas

    Philonous proves that it is impossible for the objects that we perceive to exist independently of our perception of them because physical matter is incogitable and false, ideas and the minds that have these ideas are the only things real in the world, and one cannot affirm the existence of a physical object if they do not know what a physical object is.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mercutio Monologue
    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mercutio Monologue

    After I had went to have a walk around Verona, my own company is becoming mundane.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Analysis of Diaglogues Concerning Natural Religion by David Hume Essay Example
    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis of Diaglogues Concerning Natural Religion by David Hume Essay Example

    Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion by David Hume is a philosophical piece concerning the existence of God. Arguments for and against the existence of God are portrayed in dialogue through three characters; Demea, Cleanthes, and Philo. All three agree that God exists, but they drastically differ in their opinions of God’s attributes or characteristics, and if man can understand God. The characters debate such topics as the design and whether there is more suffering or good in the world. It is a very common view among philosophers that Philo most represents Hume’s own views. Philo doesn’t go as far as denying the existence of God but attacks the others views and clearly has the most doubt or concerns of the three characters.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Paley's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Paley's Argument For The Existence Of God

    God has always been an abstract subject for me. Throughout the entirety of my life I have never had a clear understanding of what God is, or even if there is a God. However, even though I never had a clear understanding of God or how we could even know of him, Descartes and Paley suggest that we can know God and that he is within our understanding. Throughout the readings they describe and argue how we can now the existence of God and the attributes that are associated with him. However, David Hume would refute these claims saying, through his dialogues that we cannot know the attributes or even for that matter the existence. During this paper I will analyze Descartes and Paley’s arguments in comparison with David Hume’s arguments that…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics