Scholarship Tax Argumentative Essay
The choice to attend college is a personal one. Earning a college degree involves a great deal of personal commitment. Ultimately, while the individual attainment of a college degree may benefit the greater society, the overwhelming benefit is to the individual. In contrast, a public road or sidewalk benefits the many. Road and sidewalks are integral to many peoples’ daily lives. Government should seek to benefit the many; however, the Denver City Council seeks to benefit individuals through the imposition of a sales tax for scholarships. In an era of limited incomes and higher taxes, the question becomes, “Which is more more beneficial-- taxing Peter to benefit Paul only or taxing Peter to benefit all?” This question was addressed in
…show more content…
Well, that is very true and, in fact, most cities do not have the time or resources to even attempt this. Nevertheless in paragraph two on page one the readers learn that the city council has put support behind this idea. This is something the author handles very well instead of taking the council to task immediately, he waits and lets this idea sink in. The reader now has to think about the new tax and its effect on them. These ideas for a tax for scholarships passed with a very high number of yes votes. If one is unfamiliar with the city council is made up of eleven …show more content…
The author emphasized supports rejection by reminding the reader of how few other cities do this. Then, once the reader reaches paragraph three the author reminds the reader that most States and the Federal Government handle financial aid, not the city.
When creating a sound and educated argument, the facts have to be relevant to the discussion. The author uses relevant facts and the reader now synthesizes those facts are arrives at his/her own conclusion. The article now has its thinking or talking point if programs exist, why is a tax necessary, which supports rejection. When someone can eloquently make a point without coming out and saying it instead relying on logic of the reader. That is a person who has a deft hand at writing the audience will appreciate that and support the author’s
Well, that is very true and, in fact, most cities do not have the time or resources to even attempt this. Nevertheless in paragraph two on page one the readers learn that the city council has put support behind this idea. This is something the author handles very well instead of taking the council to task immediately, he waits and lets this idea sink in. The reader now has to think about the new tax and its effect on them. These ideas for a tax for scholarships passed with a very high number of yes votes. If one is unfamiliar with the city council is made up of eleven …show more content…
The author emphasized supports rejection by reminding the reader of how few other cities do this. Then, once the reader reaches paragraph three the author reminds the reader that most States and the Federal Government handle financial aid, not the city.
When creating a sound and educated argument, the facts have to be relevant to the discussion. The author uses relevant facts and the reader now synthesizes those facts are arrives at his/her own conclusion. The article now has its thinking or talking point if programs exist, why is a tax necessary, which supports rejection. When someone can eloquently make a point without coming out and saying it instead relying on logic of the reader. That is a person who has a deft hand at writing the audience will appreciate that and support the author’s