Preview

Saint Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
746 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Saint Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument
Saint Thomas Aquinas was a theologian and philosopher born in Italy in the year 1225. He created many different arguments to validate his belief that God did indeed exist. Those arguments are still used today in the debate of God’s existence. The first argument Aquinas created is the “Argument from motion.” This argument was based on the fact that objects in motion had to be set in motion by a different source. An object could not set itself in motion. Therefore, the world could not have simply appeared out of nowhere. Someone (God) had to have created it. The strength of this argument is that the science behind it is true. Newton’s first law of physics is that an “object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force”. A weakness is that this argument is claiming that everything in reality is movable, except God. He is the one exception. This answer may not satisfy non-believers and/or scientists who rely on physical evidence. Aquinas’ second argument is the “Cosmological argument”. This argument is similar to the “Argument from motion” above because it states that things can’t …show more content…
We can believe a preacher is more metaphysically good then a criminal. So if all objects have different levels of goodness, then there must be an absolute good. According to Aquinas, that absolute good is God. A strength of this argument is that a visual metaphor called the “Great chain of being” exists that can be used as an example. This metaphor is hierarchy of beings that is supposed to show the rankings of different objects in the universe when it comes to goodness and importance. A weakness of this argument is that the degree of goodness an object has is entirely subjective. Is a nun’s goodness less than that of a preacher? Is
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain the Teleological Argument (25 Marks)
    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the Teleological Argument (25 Marks)

    Thomas Aquinas was 13th century philosopher. His argument is included in his book the Summa Theologica and is the fifth of his 5 Ways.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aquinas Idea Of God: A Comparative Analysis
    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page

    Aquinas Idea Of God: A Comparative Analysis

    The idea of God is intense, as both of these analyses have shown. Aquinas’ idea of God is “Ipsum esse subsistens,” or Subsistent Act of Existing Itself (Magee, 2015). To speak of God as a self-subsistent being is to say He “Just Is.” He articulates every creature is “fundamentally composed of essence and existence.” In order for everything to exist, there must be a First Cause and Aquinas says God is that cause because without it, nothing exists. God is infinite simplicity and perfect. Aquinas and Tillich both see God as Being Itself (Fesser, 2011). Tillich places God “above God.” He writes, “God does not exist.” However, this is not in an attempt to deny God, but to demonstrate that God transcends everything.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Outline the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God (21)
    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Outline the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God (21)

    Aquinas' main argument is well known as 'Aquinas' third way'; the argument from contingency and necessity. The first of Aquinas' ways was 'from motion,' this follows the idea that all objects move and a change of quality is movement. Nothing can move itself, which then leads to the idea of a chain of movement but the chain cannot be infinate, therfor there must be an unmoved mover to begin the chain. This first mover is God. The second of Aquinas' ways was 'from efficiant causes,' this follows the idea that all things are caused by something else because they cant cause themselves or they would exist before themselves. However this would mean that there cant be an infinite chain of causes, meaning there must be a 1st cause that caused all causes, then this 1st cause is God. The third of Aquinas' ways is 'from contingency and…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Telelogical argument
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Telelogical argument

    St.Thomas Aquinas believed that existence of god could be proven. In his Summa Theologiae Aquinas put forward five proofs (or five ways) for the existence of God:First Way – Argument from Motion Second Way – Causation of Existence Third Way – Contingent and Necessary Objects Fourth Way – The Argument from Degrees and Perfection Fifth Way – The Argument from Intelligent Design.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aquinas' 3rd Way
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aquinas' 3rd Way

    Aquinas' argument has a couple of flaws in it. One is pointed out by Samuel Clarke, who says a whole series of dependent…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Aquinas' Cosmological Argument
    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Explain Aquinas' Cosmological Argument

    Aquinas’ first way is the way of motion. Aquinas uses the existence of motion of demonstrate the existence of God. He said that “Nothing can be moved from a state of potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality”. Here Aquinas uses Aristotle’s argument of the Prime Mover. The Prime Mover causes the movement of other things, in other words, it does not start off the movement by giving it some kind of push, but it is the purpose, or end, or the teleology, of the movement. Change in an object is always caused by an external movement – nothing can change itself. These movements go back in a causal chain, but Aquinas said this chain cannot be infinite so there must be something which set off this chain of movements, an unmoved mover, Prime Mover (God). Things change to fulfil their potential. If things could change themselves they would be both…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examine the cosmological argument for t
    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examine the cosmological argument for t

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Philosophical Argument For God's Sake
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Philosophical Argument For God's Sake

    Thomas Aquinas's argument for the existence of God is a deductive argument. This assessment is based on the nature of the premises in the argument. As discussed during classroom lectures, the argument's premises and conclusion can be translated as evaluate the truth value of the premises and how they support the conclusion.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    to what extent is the cosmological argument a weak argument
    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    to what extent is the cosmological argument a weak argument

    Thomas Aquinas was a very important man to the cosmological argument; it was him who came up with some of the strongest theories to support the argument. He came up with his five proofs which to him proved the cosmological argument to be true. One of his proof was the ‘cause’ proof, this goes as follows; nothing can change by itself therefore everything is caused and as Aquinas didn’t believe in infinite regress he said that there couldn’t be a series of infinite causes. So there must be a first cause, a cause that isn’t itself caused by another, and Aquinas would say this is God. But if infinite regress was proved to be true or even possible it would completely undermine this argument and prove it invalid, this is the same case as many of the other theories of the cosmological argument.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Key Features of the Cosmological Argument

    Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle’s ideas and offered the ‘Five Ways’ which have the aim to prove the existence of God. Three of the five form the cosmological argument. The first way is motion, the second is cause and the third is necessity and contingency.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Plato's Design Argument Analysis
    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Plato's Design Argument Analysis

    The argument starts by stating there is an efficient cause for everything. Nothing can be an efficient cause of itself. It is not possible to regress to infinity in efficient causes (Harris, 44). To take away the cause is to take away the effect. If there is no first cause then there will be no others (Harris, 45). Clearly Aquinas argues for an Efficient Cause. It indicates that each prior cause must itself have its own cause leading to God as the Efficient Cause (Harris, 45). His “Third proof” is the argument from…

    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Cosmological Argument Analysis
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument Analysis

    Aquinas’s view on the relationship between faith and reason is that they are overlapping. He says that man should use all things he can to learn about God. Aquinas states that there is general revelation and special revelation. General revelation is anything in the world, we use logic to see these. General revelation is reason. Special revelation can be seen through scripture and religion. Special revelation is faith. Aquinas believes that we should use any means we can to learn about God, so it is essential to use both general and special revelation. Through general revelation, he believes that we can use reason to give context to our faith. We can use reason to demonstrate some truths about faith, for example, the fact that God exists. Because you cannot understand everything from reason alone, there is some part of faith that can only be shown by special revelation. Aquinas believes that some things in faith that can be explained by reason and some ideas in reason that can be explained by faith and that is where the two overlap. On the other hand, there are other ideas that only faith can explain or only reason can explain. This is why he has an overlapping view on faith and reason because some ideas over lap and some do…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument
    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cosmological Argument

    St. Thomas Aquinas presents one of the earliest teleological arguments in his Summa Theologica. Aquinas argues that anything with knowledge moves toward and end or cause. But, natural bodies, or planets, do not have knowledge and they still move toward an end. By an end, Aquinas means that the planets take the same path of orbit around the sun. Thus, Aquinas argues, if an unintelligent body is moving toward an end, it must be directed by an intelligent being. This intelligent being must be God (Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Article 3, Question…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ontological Argument Analysis

    This particular argument is also in favor if the idea that God does in fact exist, but Aquinas has a different explanation from Anselm. Thomas Aquinas presents the argument known as the “Cosmological” or “first cause”. In a few words, this means that Aquinas believes there must have been a first cause in the world. Aquinas argues that the proof of Gods existence is based on the basis of experiences. God must exist because every being that is dependent for existence was caused by something else that happened prior to it. He believes either there is a boundless chain of contingent beings that is extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that was not caused by something else but began everything else. But in reality, there cannot be a continuous chain extending backwards. Therefore; there is a first cause, something that was not caused by anything else but started everything else that currently exists. Aquinas claims the existence of God can be proven in five ways: Argument from motion, Nature of efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and Governance of the world. Aquinas gives us an argument that is not hard to interpret. There must have been one who created mankind, constructing the world one being at a time. It is very easy to go along with the idea that there is one person or thing that created everything else. While this argument is clear and…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Thomas Aquinas: The Existence Of God
    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Analysis Of Thomas Aquinas: The Existence Of God

    The objections begin by stating that you cannot demonstrate God. Faith deals with concepts not having to be concrete to be believable, therefore not being demonstrable. Demonstrating is showing concrete evidence of something. However, using our faith, we know God exists. It goes on to say the middle term for demonstration is based on not giving the full information; parts that create the whole. We do not know what God is, just what He is not; not giving full insight of what He is, which is belief and faith that completes this demonstration. Lastly, it states that if God could be demonstrated, it would be through his effects; the creations he has made. However, the material God has made has a termination while He is eternal, therefore God cannot be demonstrated. Aquinas responds by say that there cannot be an effect without its cause. The effect is what is known to us and effects have to exist but causes have to pre-exist. The existence of God is not self-evidently seen but his effects are well known to us because if not, we would not be here; henceforth cause and effect.…

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics