Preview

Richard Dawkins: The Controversy Between Science And Religion

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1163 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Richard Dawkins: The Controversy Between Science And Religion
Over the years we have seen the evolution of science and how it was grown to be what is considered science today. In all that growth, there have always been controversial aspects of science, which are still disputed today. One large controversy that still stands today is the theory of evolution is the idea of religion and the story of creation. These two concepts can be either seen as two opposing sides or two separate entities that have nothing to do with the other. Either way, the theory of evolution and religion have yet to see eye to eye. With every controversy there will be people standing on both ends of the spectrum. On the side of evolution with no belief in religion or God is Richard Dawkins. On the other end of the spectrum are people who take the literal interpretation of the bible. There are also some people who believe in a combination of religion and evolution, Stephen Gould. Over the years, people gave gained popularity for their ideas within the field of science and religion. …show more content…
Although his family was originally from England, Dawkins was born on March 26,1941 in Nairobi, Kenya (Dickerson 1999). This was because his father had been deployed there for World War II (Dickerson 1999). While spending his early childhood in Kenya on the front of the war, Dawkins was influenced by all he had seen and witnessed, which played an important part his future studies. At a young age Dawkins took an interest in animals (Dickerson 1999). He would watch the way animals moved, their behavior, the similarities and differences between several animal species (Dickerson 1999). His interest in animals would lead his to study zoology. Dawkins attended Oxford University and in 1966 he received his doctorate degree in zoology (Dickerson

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    James Patrick Holding’s article talks about how “demagogues” like Dawkins find it hard to believe that creationists’ views are accepted and the double standard shown by them in accepting a thesis. The author seems to be offended as indicated by how he can mention “a lengthy list of the insulting rhetoric Dawkins has heaped upon the creationists”. Holding questions the credibility of the beliefs supported by Dawkins, who seems to be raising doubts on the view point of the creationists because the view belongs to a minority alone. Holding believes that people like Dawkins rarely put an effort in researching a particular idea, but they add those beliefs in their “agenda” only if it proves to be beneficial for them. The readers get the hint of irony that Holding tries to convey through his article that even though Dawkins supports the ‘Christ myth’ through his actions, he happens to give a statement of how there is a possibility of the existence of Jesus. The mockery in the article is pretty obvious as first Dawkins is said to have worked in a film called “The God Who Wasn’t There” – a film that supports the idea of how Jesus did not even exist at all. The author further mentions how the “Christ Myth” remains unsupported by any of the historians and the “leading proponent of Christ myth over the past century – is not a historian, but a professor of German”. The readers begin to doubt the credibility of Dawkins after reading this article and whether he and his “ideological cohorts” actually care to research a prevalent idea before they declare their endorsement of it. Even though people like Dawkins make sure their beliefs are free from any kind of doubts, most of the readers would definitely become cautious in believing the claims of these people after reading this…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his review of a new book called "Brief candle in the dark",Steven Shapin of The Guardian seems to evenhandedly evaluate Richard Dawkins,one of the top thinkers of current world. As a professor of "public understanding of science" at Oxford, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins shifted his intellectual emphasis to more of a preacher of "Reasons" that,according to Dawkins,are almost exclusively yields of science than clarifying the biological way of understanding the world around us. As a self-professed victorian in an imaginary war between cultures, Dawkins claims that science has won by a big margin and ostracized others such as religion,philosophy to the extent that almost led them to obsoleteness. In answering deep philosophical questions…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Darwinian evolution theory came out 150 years ago when it was first introduced in On the Origin of Species in 1859, nowadays there are still many people who firmly believe in the creationism, even some who are well educated. In chapter three of River Out of Eden Richard Dawkins brings out this situation and refutes creationism by citing scientific experiments, and finally he points out that gradualism is a principle of the evolution nature world, one that becomes indispensable when one is trying to explain complex phenomena.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. What is Dawkins' basis or argument about religion? Do you think he’s right or wrong? Give reasons for your opinion. If he interviewed you, what would have to…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jw Apps Claim

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A good example of this is the big question of how the earth and humans were created. According to Christians, the existence of us today is completely from God’s creation. However, if we discuss this with many scientists, you would altogether get a different viewpoint as they would most likely disagree with the Christian’s belief. This is because they have their own belief that we humans were created through evolution.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He solely bases his beliefs on the quantity of evidence held by each side, using scientific evidence when regarding evolution and biblical literalism when regarding creationism. Dawkins from his statement concludes that based on his studies, all the evidence points towards evolution, implying that the Bible or any other religious book or testament is not a sufficient amount of data to conclude that the belief that life was created by a divine being is legitimate. Furthermore, Dawkins’ argument is captivating by distinctly claiming that he believes in one side over the other, averting from flaw of the “Integration” model, where science and religion can be basically unified as if they were in the same field of study. Additionally, Dawkins mentions the lack of evidence creationism has which can be compared to a film in which a character had the same problem,…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Dawkins Analysis

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To begin in the video “Bill O’Reilly SCARED by Richard Dawkins” you see Bill O’ Reilly and Richard Dawkins going back in forth over the belief and evidence for god to exist. In the video you can see clearly that Richard Dawkins does not believe in a god and also tries to present facts to Bill as to why. Vice-versa you can clearly see that Bill O’ Reilly does belive in god and tries to convince Dawkins that god does exist. Now to go on to the main point, in my opion if W.K Clifford the famous English mathematician and philosopher were there he would not completely side with either on the topic, however I feel that he would most likely leen to the side with Richard Dawkins. Before going further into why, W.K Clifford was a man who was known to go against…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science verses Religion has been an ongoing debate all over the world for centuries. Depending on who one talks to about these topic will depend on the passion and beliefs one has. As we saw in the movie Angels and Demons all the major characters such as Robert Langdon, Camerlengo McKenna and the former pope had their own strong feelings and beliefs. Certain questions have been raised about these two topics that I will be elaborating on later in this essay such as, Is there room in the world for both, Can one render the other obsolete, and would I rather live in a world without science or religion? I find all these questions very interesting and interaging, just like the movie Angels and Demons.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Humans are the most precious creations of God. It is seen on how people differ from other contrivance of the creator. Mortals are mold to be the most ingenious life forms. Also they do acquire skill and talents that they enhance from time to time. Honestly speaking, through the abilities that a person obtains it become the key for developing and improving our society. In fact through the use of their mental capability it results for big changes in our global community.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most often people believe that science and religion are mutually exclusive. Yet Jane Goodall found a way to connect the two. She was questioned by a bellhop about her beliefs, “I told him that I had always thought that the biblical description of God creating the world in seven days might well have been an attempt to explain evolution in a parable. In that case, each of the days would have been several million years” (Goodall, 114). Being a scientist, Goodall believed that animals evolved overtime, yet she also believed that God existed and that possibly the theory of evolution and the biblical description of the creation of the world were just metaphors for one another. Many people would not think of combining the two concepts of religion and science yet Goodall’s explanation is…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a result of many new astronomical discoveries throughout the seventeenth century, it was clear science and religion greatly contradicted each other. Followed by the questioned findings of Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei believed the sun was situated motionless in the center of the universe while the earth rotated on its axis, all the while revolving around the sun. This idea, though scientifically proven to be correct, completely opposed the underlying structure of the universe and heavens as originally stated in the Holy Bible. In his “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina,” Galileo explained to his subject how what was found true through physical findings were not in fact directly coincided with matters of faith. Unlike what was stated in the Bible, Galileo felt as though faith and science were two separate entities, and should be kept apart. Naturally, Galileo’s scientific findings sent the Catholic world into an uproar. As a result of the craziness that ensued from his astronomical discoveries within the theologian society, Galileo believed theologians should not have been allowed to be involved in the world of science during the 17th century in his “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina.”…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charles Darwin is famous for his contributions to the evolution theory. Richard Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist, English writer as well as being an evolutionary biologist. The common factor between these two people is that they are both known for their views on evolution.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science and Religion

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess the view that science has replaced religion as the main ideological influence in society today? (33 marks)…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One popular cultural argument when the topic of evolution arises is faith versus reason. “Life is a battle between faith and reason in which each feeds upon the other, drawing sustenance from it and destroying it.” (Reinhold Niebuhr) This quote accurately describes the opposing view points of faith and reason. “Faith is the highest passion in a human being. Many in every generation may not come that far, but none comes further” (Soren Kierkegaard) Like Kierkegaard, some people are passionate about their religion and will not accept any other form of thought. Unlike Kierkegaard, Sir John Powell strictly follows reason for his process of thought. “Let us consider the reason of the case. For nothing is law that is not reason.” (Sir John Powell)…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Science Against Religion

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Wade, N. (2011). Phonetic Clues Hint Language is Africa – Born. New York Times, Retrieved…

    • 2265 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays