Preview

Science Against Religion

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2265 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Science Against Religion
Conflict: Science against Religion
Kimberly Abad
PHI 103
Prof. Taneshia Pugh
September 1, 2012

Conflict: Science against Religion
Throughout the ages science and religion have struggled with one another. They both are constantly striving to gain the upper hand against the other. Within this struggle both are trying to assert the fact that their ideas are accurate and how the others ideas are inaccurate. Science yearns to answer the questions of how things happen through the means of solid facts. Religion, on the other hand, seeks to answer the question of why things occur and its thought process is grounded in faith. Some believe that the two views are not in turmoil with one another. This thought process is extremely skewed because these two belief systems contradict one another consistently and believers of each view then struggle to prove their perspective is correct. Science and religion, “do not have the same viewpoints about the nature of the world or agree about how truth is perceived or confined” (Neese, 2001). These two ideologies are at war with one another. The issues between the two cannot be overlooked or brushed under the rug because there are too many opposing aspects. Because of this there is no way for these two ideologies to coexist harmoniously.
When science and religion have overlapping topics that attempt to answer the same questions, conflict occurs between believers of each theory. A good example of this overlap is the Evolution theory. This theory has caused controversy from its beginnings in history. Evolution, as defined by Webster’s Dictionary, is “a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations” (Webster, 2012). The placement of this theory in high school text books has been very controversial. Multiple court cases have been fought over the theory of evolution and its



References: Abrams, M. (2007). BORN GAY?. Discover, 28: 58-83. Retrieved Friday, August 10, 2012 from EBSCOhost database. DIAS, P. (2010). Is Science Very Different from Religion? A Polanyian Perspective. Science & Christian Belief, 22(1), 43-55 “Evolution”. (2012). In Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved August 28, 2012, from http://www. Fish, J. M. (2010). Science VS Religion DEBATE. Humanist,70(4), 27-31. Fitzpatrick,L Fossil and Radiosiotope Dating. (2011). Retrieved August 28, 2012, from http://creationscience today.com/28-Carbon-14_Dating.html Helden, A.V. (1995). The Galileo Project. Retrieved from http://galileo.rice.edu/bio/narrative _7.html. Masamura,M. , Mead, L. (2001). Ten Major Court Cases About Evolution and Creationism. Retrieved from http://ncse.com/taking-action/ten-major-court-cases-evolution- Neese, L. H. (2001). SCIENCE vs. RELIGION: The Challenge of Interpretation. USA Today Magazine, 130(2674), 70 Robins, M. (2006). How We Know Earth’s Age. Discover, 27(3), 22-23. Retrieved Friday, August 10, 2012 from EBSCOhost database. Wade, N. (2011). Phonetic Clues Hint Language is Africa – Born. New York Times, Retrieved from http://newyorktimes.com.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The book acknowledges that this discipline is overwhelmingly secular. Because of this, science tries to leave out God as creator and the ultimate answer to difficult questions. Accordingly, the author does not suggest that all scientific thought and testing be discarded, rather science confirms what we know about God.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sacks Great Partnership

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rabbi Jonathan Sacks’ The Great Partnership: Science, Religion and the Search for Meaning depicts Sacks’ understanding of the relationship between religion and science. In the first part of the book, Sacks’ differentiates between religion and science and discusses some of the reasons why people believe that science and religion are incompatible. The second part of Sacks’ book is primarily about the importance of religion and the effect on the world if religion was lost. The last and final part of his book goes over some of the major challenges that science and people pose to faith. The main thesis of Sacks’ book is that science and religion are two ways of thinking that are necessary and compatible with one another. According to Sacks’ science…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Attention Getter: The great quarrel between science and religion has been in full swing since their beginning and has since taken a twist into controversy. Science wants to see the facts while religion bases everything on their belief in the Bible. These statements still hold truth today.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Overemphasis on one philosophy has often led to a strong reaction by another philosophy. In our time of emphasizing science, we see a resurgence of religious fundamentalism in many parts of the world. This may be explained by a closing-of-the-ranks of those who feel seriously threatened in their security by the loss of the foundation of their faith and culture or gain merit by fighting for their faith – and also explained by the defense of hierarchies hanging on to their power.…

    • 2841 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “It is a primordial mystery that has engaged human imagination from the down time: Who are we? Where did we come from? What is our ultimate destiny? The story of creation—whether told through the imagery of ancient myth; the revelations of scared tradition or the theories of modern physics and biology – is the story of what it means to be a human. And it is a story over which religion and science have been fighting for centuries. Since Copernicus overturned the church-sanctioned view of the Earth as the center of the universe and Charles Darwin posited random mutation and natural selection as the real creators of human life, the biblical view that ‘In the beginning God created the heavens and the Earth’ has found itself under increasing attack in modern Western thought” (Sheler, 1991, par. 1).…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plantinga, Alvin. Where the conflict really lies: science, religion, and naturalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.…

    • 3866 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science verses Religion has been an ongoing debate all over the world for centuries. Depending on who one talks to about these topic will depend on the passion and beliefs one has. As we saw in the movie Angels and Demons all the major characters such as Robert Langdon, Camerlengo McKenna and the former pope had their own strong feelings and beliefs. Certain questions have been raised about these two topics that I will be elaborating on later in this essay such as, Is there room in the world for both, Can one render the other obsolete, and would I rather live in a world without science or religion? I find all these questions very interesting and interaging, just like the movie Angels and Demons.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most often people believe that science and religion are mutually exclusive. Yet Jane Goodall found a way to connect the two. She was questioned by a bellhop about her beliefs, “I told him that I had always thought that the biblical description of God creating the world in seven days might well have been an attempt to explain evolution in a parable. In that case, each of the days would have been several million years” (Goodall, 114). Being a scientist, Goodall believed that animals evolved overtime, yet she also believed that God existed and that possibly the theory of evolution and the biblical description of the creation of the world were just metaphors for one another. Many people would not think of combining the two concepts of religion and science yet Goodall’s explanation is…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whereas the Religious theory is word of mouth and the Bible, science has facts to prove that it is right.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    between advocates of science from one hand, and the advocates of religion, which is apparently the…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science and Religion

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess the view that science has replaced religion as the main ideological influence in society today? (33 marks)…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weston Meehan

    • 3393 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Before the Evolutionary theory’s inception the four burning questions of man has been who am I, where did I come from, why am I here, and where do I go when I die? The answer to these questions has always been some sort of religion, and that this world has a designer with an incredible plan. Now as time has progressed a very dangerous solution was introduced to the world and with its arrival it is changing the very fabric of humanity. The new religion of the day is science and this affects our legal system, school system, and thought process. These effects over time can be detrimental to the minds and morals of us as a society.…

    • 3393 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Normally, there are minimal conflicts between scientists and theologians. They usually work in different areas of interest. Theologians are rarely interested in the tensile strength of steel. Scientists -- at work, at least -- are rarely interested in the soul, salvation, Heaven or Hell. But there are shared areas where both scientists and theologians promote their own beliefs. Often, these beliefs are in conflict.…

    • 4676 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lawrence Krauss has repeatedly stated that teaching religion in science is “child abuse”. The term, “child abuse” when used in this context is extreme. Krauss (2013) explains the purpose of education is to teach children the truth providing empirical evidence based on facts, and knowledge of science and religion do not coexist. However, Krauss wants to exclude religion from science because he observes that there are ethical boundaries in science such as telling the truth, but the methodology is to exclude religion from education in general because religion is fiction with no empirical evidence to support it but only have ethics. Krauss justifies how science based, not on ideology or testimonies science supports the methods with empirical facts that can provide us a better understanding to overcome ignorance. While “child abuse” perhaps antagonizing word to express Krauss’s ideas, on the other hand, creationism with science should not be taught in class because they based on different knowledge that also contradicts the other. Religion does not have a place in science but does have a role as a subject as long it is not mixed with science.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Christian Science

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages

    "The Watchman Expositor: Christian Science Profile." Watchman Fellowship: A Christian Research and Apologetics Ministry. Web. 14 Dec. 2010. .…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays