Restoration In Modern England: The Cause-Effect Revolution
Option 3: Restoration
Since the sixteenth century, England experienced a gradual evolution and development an economy based on individual initiative, competition and profit, social transformations. In that way gradually emerged a new nobility, interested in the development of industrial production. The bourgeoisie began training to control the economic life of the country. In this essay I will explain the importance of the Restoration in society, in theater, but also in religion connection all these represented by the cause-effect relationship. Afterwards, I will demonstrate that Restoration is a period of contradiction, time described in this mode by Tim Harris. I will show that Restoration revealed accurate moment in history, but also instability …show more content…
Parliament does not give sufficient finance King in order to reign undisturbed, no permanent army, as instinctive need of freedom existing in England. Of 1660-1688, England seeks to find a balance, a formula of compromise between Parliament and the king. The power over time that balances was strongly affected. The troubles of Civil War largely due to the conflict between Catholics and Protestants and absolutism of the two kings showed that thing. Charles II (1660-1680) seeks a balance between absolutist tendencies and the necessity to respect the prerogatives of Parliament. In spite all of qualities Charles II had no particular vision or political strategy and represented a flaw of period. In 1664 is voted The Triennial Act, in according to which Parliament must be part of the kingdom for 3 years. Restoration in England lasted from 1660 until 1688, followed by the Glorious Revolution .However not promised to take no action against those who had led the revolution; Stuart had persecuted many revolutionaries and tried to introduce absolute monarchy. In this period, conflicts between monarchy and Parliament recur and are essentially religious. Charles II and James II were charged with links to Catholicism while England have a basic religion called Anglicanism. Parliament took a decision so that the two were removed from the throne in 1688.In their place was coming William …show more content…
I have done it by explain that the emergence of new answers, religious and political differences which divided the parties and the people created a misleading period of the Restoration. Importance of human rights, the desire to write and to treat events happened have opened a door to
Since the sixteenth century, England experienced a gradual evolution and development an economy based on individual initiative, competition and profit, social transformations. In that way gradually emerged a new nobility, interested in the development of industrial production. The bourgeoisie began training to control the economic life of the country. In this essay I will explain the importance of the Restoration in society, in theater, but also in religion connection all these represented by the cause-effect relationship. Afterwards, I will demonstrate that Restoration is a period of contradiction, time described in this mode by Tim Harris. I will show that Restoration revealed accurate moment in history, but also instability …show more content…
Parliament does not give sufficient finance King in order to reign undisturbed, no permanent army, as instinctive need of freedom existing in England. Of 1660-1688, England seeks to find a balance, a formula of compromise between Parliament and the king. The power over time that balances was strongly affected. The troubles of Civil War largely due to the conflict between Catholics and Protestants and absolutism of the two kings showed that thing. Charles II (1660-1680) seeks a balance between absolutist tendencies and the necessity to respect the prerogatives of Parliament. In spite all of qualities Charles II had no particular vision or political strategy and represented a flaw of period. In 1664 is voted The Triennial Act, in according to which Parliament must be part of the kingdom for 3 years. Restoration in England lasted from 1660 until 1688, followed by the Glorious Revolution .However not promised to take no action against those who had led the revolution; Stuart had persecuted many revolutionaries and tried to introduce absolute monarchy. In this period, conflicts between monarchy and Parliament recur and are essentially religious. Charles II and James II were charged with links to Catholicism while England have a basic religion called Anglicanism. Parliament took a decision so that the two were removed from the throne in 1688.In their place was coming William …show more content…
I have done it by explain that the emergence of new answers, religious and political differences which divided the parties and the people created a misleading period of the Restoration. Importance of human rights, the desire to write and to treat events happened have opened a door to