Preview

Response: Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1237 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Response: Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns
Writing 121
9 June 2014

Response: Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns
Molly Ivins, a liberal columnist who was made famous by picking fun at her home state of Texas and mocking politicians, battled breast cancer before she died in 2007. Although her essay, Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Ride of Guns is over a decade old, her words are still a hot topic today. Molly Ivin’s essay takes on the gun control debate, engaging the audience with a sarcastic perspective that leaves them asking themselves if they just read an entertaining satire or a convincing and thoughtful piece. Even though good points were made as to the reason why guns are bad, not everything was easy to agree with.
Molly Ivins supports her reasoning to get rid of guns with entertaining exaggerations, some confusing back and forth views, but also her humor and momentum. She begins by emphasizing she is not “anti-gun”( Paragraph 2). Immediately after that she makes sure to announce she is “pro-knife”, this was the first ripple in the water that confused me as a reader. Was she attacking the gun owners making fun of the expression bringing a knife to a gun fight? At first I thought she would have a similar view with the Mexican Restaurant, Chipotle. Boring yet safe Chipotle expressed their unbiased view by asking the gun owners to politely not bring assault rifles around them. In doing so they do not completely lose their gun owners sales. I think she was using a similar tactic to secure some readers from not just throwing the book away at first glance. Unless she was using this as a slap in the face to the gun owner’s stupidity and a quick chance to get a laugh from the “knife advocates”. Ivins continues with a view against guns and in favor of knives, which would “promote physical fitness” as she says a person would have to chase down their victim and catch up to them to stab them. She compares this to the obesity issue in the US by making fun at the relationship between lazy obese people



Cited: Vernick, Jon S. "Changing the Constitutional Landscape for Firearms: The US Supreme Court 's Recent Second Amendment Decisions." Changing the Constitutional Landscape for Firearms: The US Supreme Court 's Recent Second Amendment Decisions. (n.d.): n. pag. PCC Library. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Web. "The uninfringed; Guns and the Supreme Court." The Economist 3 July 2010: 29(US). Biography in Context. Web. 9 June 2014. "High Court to Rule on Washington Gun Ban." EBSCO HOST. Geelong Advertiser, 27 Nov. 2007. Web.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Invincible Ignorance” by Thomas Sowell appeared in The Bismarck Tribune as apart of his syndicated column on December 24, 2012. Are gun control laws effective? Are guns really the problem? Or is it people that are the problem? Sowell answers each of these questions and states his opinion strong and clear. His tone, diction and background all play roles in his rhetorical strategy for his article. Gun control was a huge topic in the year 2012 and continues to be as we move into 2013.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The civil libertarian writer, Molly Ivins, in her Op-Ed argument, “Taking A Stab At Our Infatuation With Guns” published in 1993 addresses the topic of making United states a gun free country in accordance of the United States Second Amendment to prevent any more unnecessary harm to the Millennium class. Ivins supports her claim by using a homespun diction, analogy imagery, colloquial style and loose, cumulative sentence syntax to create a restatement effect. Examples from the text include a goodwill attitude toward the subject. By setting herself as a civil libertarian it gives the audience a sense of commonly known ground. Ivins tries to make herself seem equal to her audience by also using homespun language to make her audience relate to…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the argumentative essay “Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get rid of Guns,” Molly Ivins…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Molly Ivin’s view is she is not antigun she is pro knife .She supports the second amendment and believes that all children 14 and under are too young to be having guns. And having so many guns owners is destroying our security of this Free State. She believes that guns should stay in the hands of the armed forces and military. She states that like automobiles if u can handle them what makes u think u can handle a gun and with having a license and tracking of selling car she feels that it should be the same way for guns.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    American radio host and political commentator, Tammy Bruce, in her article, Why Gun Control Wont End Mass Murder, describes many statistics of gun violence. Bruce’s purpose is to make her readers aware of gun violence and the many factors contributing to it as well as how it is statistically unlikely that gun control will help. She adopts an aggressive tone in order to support those that agree with her. The main ideas expressed throughout this article are that politicians use shootings and gun violence for political gain and aren’t doing anything to stop it. She explains that gun control wont stop gun violence because of problems such as drugs leading to terrorists. Tammy Bruce in her article uses many statistics and viewpoints to support her claim against gun control.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “After Scalise Shooting, a Twist: Lawmakers Want to Loosen Gun Laws” by Emily Cochrane demonstrates the politics of gun control. After the recent Scalise shooting at a baseball field, gun control laws have been put into the spotlight. A debate between lawmakers who want to loosen gun control laws and lawmakers who want to make them stricter. After the Conservative lawmakers were almost victims, they decided that they should be able to have a concealed weapon on them. Being shot at gave them a different perspective on gun control and felt that it should be less intense. They felt that no matter what, “the bad guys are always going to get guns” (Cochrane). Even today, there is still debate on how strict gun control laws should…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author included numerous rhetorical strategies to reinforce his rather shocking stance that Americans love their guns and that those guns are here to stay. The authors use of visual descriptions, incidents, and statistics were all appropriate examples used to establish and display the ideas effectively. The composition of the article flows really well, a lot of information is presented but also condensed, mentioning only what is vital to the argument. The author is direct and to the point and the author does not deviate from the main argument, constantly coming back and endorsing his/her opinion. The author mentions, “many Americans have already come to the remarkable conclusion that the best route to a safer America is a better-armed America,” (“Leaders: America and Guns”). The author is constantly on point with his/her information. These statements are so stark and bold; they definitely resonate with the audience. An abundance of research and emotionally charged writing made this article a solid and convincing piece for…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In her essay “Why Handguns Must Be Outlawed,” Nan Desuka brings for the issue whether handguns should be outlawed except to police and other service units. I disagree with Desuka’s position on banning handguns. This essay offers arguments why they should be banned without offering realistic solutions to the problems Desuka states in owning handguns. Retaining legalized handguns affects all of us. It’s essential to Collectors and sportsmen, and vital to all our safety. I do not believe that banning handguns will overall decrease violent crimes or the deaths due to violent crimes.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Library of Congress. (2011, April). United States: Gun Ownership and the Supreme Court. Retrieved from…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New York Times best selling author, radio host, and Fox News contributor, Tammy Bruce, wrote an article called “Why Gun Control Won’t End Mass Murders.” Bruce’s purpose is to inform readers that gun control laws are not going to stop murders from occurring. She adopts a grim tone in order to get her readers to think about why the gun laws are the way they are. For years the government has been trying to enforce gun laws and yet murders rates are not decreasing. Some points Bruce addresses include mass shootings, liberals, and the Mayo Clinc’s statistics towards drugs. Tammy Bruce was not successful in getting her point across.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cited: Bella, Tim. “Campuses Debate Gun Control Issues.” Daily Skiff 30 Nov. 2007. Web. 27 Mar. 2009. "Concealed Campus.com." Students for Concealed Carry on Campus. Web. 28 Mar 2009. "Court Rules in Favor of Second Amendment Gun Right." Los Angeles Times 26 June 2008. Web. 3 Apr. 2009. Cruz, Barbara. School Shootings and School Violence. Berkeley Heights, NJ: Enslow, 2002. Currie-McGhee, L.K. Gun Control. Farmington Hills, MI: Lucent, 2004. Feldman, Richard. Ricochet Confessions of a Gun Lobbyist. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2008. Goldman, Russell. “Gunman Planned Campus Shooting for at Least a Week.” ABCnews.com ABC, 2008. Web. 14 Mar. 2008. Haerens, Margaret. Gun Violence. New York: Greenhaven, 2006. “If I only Had a Gun.” 20/20. Narr. Diane Sawyer and David Muir. ABC. 10 Apr. 2009. Television. “Justices Set to Mull Gun Rights.” MSNBC.com. MSNBC, 2008. Web. 18 Mar. 2008. Mahasneh, Nadine. “Issues Raise Questions in Wake of Tragedies.” The Exponent Online 28 Feb. 2008. Web. 14 Mar 2008 Roleff, Tamara L. Gun Control. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven, 2007. Thomas, Murray. Violence in America 's Schools. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2006. "What Are the Gun Laws in Indiana." About.com. Web. 3 Apr. 2009. "What We Want." Protest Easy Guns. Web. 4 April 2009.…

    • 2923 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bowling for Columbine

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Michael Marshall once said “you can’t stop being afraid by pretending everything that scares you is there” that evidently means that fear is not real. It is the product of thoughts you create, however danger is real, but fear is a choice. When following Michael Moore’s journey in the documentary Bowling for Columbine, it is proven that most, if not all Americans live in fear. In doing so, he learns that the conventional answers of easy availability of guns ultimately lead to America’s culture of fear, bigotry and violence in a nation of widespread gun ownership. Moore’s implementation of symbolism, satirical techniques and imagery support his criticism against the firearm regulations in America. He brings in the attention of how unstable the American gun culture is as he emphasizes the consequences to generate change in the American system.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2nd Amendment Essay

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Bibliography: Brown, Peter H., and Daniel G. Abel. Outgunned: Up against the NRA: The First Complete Insider Account of the Battle over Gun Control. New York: Free, 2003. Print.…

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: "Gun Policy Facts and News." Gun Policy Facts and News. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 June 2013.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stricter Gun Laws

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anything could be used as a weapon to hurt or kill someone. Criminals could create weapons from things found in local stores such as Home Depot, Lowes, or any other hardware store. By making weapons instead of purchasing, no one knows if he or she is creating a weapon or just using the tools for its intended purpose. People also buy chemicals off the internet to create bombs that can kill numerous amounts of people. Even by making guns illegal for citizens, this law won’t change a thing for criminals that make weapons to kill people. By taking away our rights to bear arms citizens are left with less protection. Guns aren’t the reason people are killed, it’s the criminals that use them. “You can’t blame the gun any more than you blame the car after a fatal accident… you punish the individuals.”(Sepcoski 2).…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays