Preview

Research In Motion

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1193 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Research In Motion
DeVry University
Keller Graduate School of Management

Research in Motion (RIM)

By
Gbolade O. Soneyin gsoneyin@my.keller.edu (770) 598-5006
NETW-583-18552 Strategic Management of Technology
Professor John Lambrou
Friday, January 24, 2015
Abstract
BlackBerry Limited, formerly known as Research in Motion (RIM), was a key player in the smartphone market. Created by two friends in 1984, it grew to become one of the leading manufacturers of applications and hardware for the mobile phone industry. Through services development and integrating, software, RIM was able to develop quality products. Protecting its intellectual property was one of the major security concerns of the organization in its battle with New Technology Products (NTP). The company will later found tougher challenge in the likes of Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Keywords: research in motion, rim, intellectual property, blackberry

Research In Motion (RIM), co-founded by Mike Lazaridis (University of Waterloo) and Douglas Fregin (University of Windsor) in 1984; the company was set up as an electronics and computer science-consulting firm in Waterloo, Canada. About four years later, the company would focus on the transmission of wireless data and setting up of wireless point-of-sale customer terminals using radio waves (Gillette, Brady, & Winter, 2013).
At the peak of the dot-com bubble in 2000, New Technology Products (NTP); a patent holding company, sent a letter to RIM, informing them that they were infringing on eight of NTP’s patents, the letter also requested that RIM negotiate rights to license the technology in question. After an internal review, RIM came to a different conclusion that they were not infringing, RIM choose not to acknowledge the receipt of the letter. This decision will come to threaten the existence of RIM. In November 2001, NTP filed a complaint in the US courts (Weston & Lim, 2007).
The court later narrows down the eight patents to five, “NTP’s five patents at issue



References: Ensign, P. C., & Robinson, N. P. (2008). BlackBerry in Red China: Research in Motion Navigates Institutional Barriers in an Emerging Market. Thunderbird International Business Review Vol. 50, No. 2, 129-142. Gillette, F., Brady, D., & Winter, C. (2013, December 5). The Rise and Fall of BlackBerry: An Oral History. Retrieved from Bloomberg Business Week: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-12-05/the-rise-and-fall-of-blackberry-an-oral-history Hardy, E. (2006, August 7). Pictures Leaked of a BlackBerry with Camera, Music, and Video Support. Retrieved January 24, 2015, from Brighthand: http://www.brighthand.com/news/pictures-leaked-of-a-blackberry-with-camera-music-and-video-support/ Lane, J. (2006). NTP, Inc. V. Research In Motion, Ltd.: Inventions Are Global, But Politics Are Still Local - An Examination of the BlackBerry Case. Berkeley Technology Law Journal Vol. 21:59, 59-77. Monica, P. R. (2011, November 4). Black (and Blue) Berry: What 's next for RIM? Retrieved January 21, 2015, from CNN Money: http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/04/technology/thebuzz/ Tindal, S. (2009, March 4). RIM Records Employee Calls To Protect IP. Retrieved January 22, 2014, from CNET: http://www.cnet.com/news/rim-records-employee-calls-to-protect-ip/ Weston, D., & Lim, D. K. (2007). BlackBerry: A Teaching Case for WIPO. IPRIA Case Study, 1-16.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This file of ECON 545 Week 3 Discussion Question 2 Anti-Trust Policy and Microsoft consists of: Is Microsoft a monopoly? In what ways could it be consi...…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Issue of this case was to determine whether or not Signature 's claimed invention the “056 Patent”, a data processing system, is drawn to statutory subject topic under 35 U.S.C 101. The Court ruling holds that the '056 Patent is directed to non-statutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C 101 and is therefore invalid. A unanimous Federal Circuit panel of Judges named Rich, Plager and Bryson overturned The Massachusetts District Courts…

    • 2418 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M International (“M”) and W Inc. (“W,” a competitor of M) have been engaged in long- standing litigation over a specific patent infringement matter. Below is a summary timeline of specific events that have taken place related to this matter:…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to their website, "Research In Motion Limited (RIM) (TSX: RIM, NASDAQ: RIMM) is a Canadian wireless and telecommunication equipment company. It is headquartered in Ontario, Canada and employs more than 17,000 people. It is famous as the production of the tablet and BlackBerry smartphone." (Research In Motion Ltd., 2012)…

    • 5572 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    RIM is a company that has embraced technological innovation and its success has been a result of their key developments as taken from fundinguniverse.com that listed the key developments of RIM as follows:…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mkt100 Textbook - Chapter 1

    • 15926 Words
    • 64 Pages

    The BlackBerry is one of Canada's most successful and innovative products. It changed not only the way…

    • 15926 Words
    • 64 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Isaac, M. (2012, February 3). RIM Claws Back Against Apple and Google With Free Tablets. Retrieved from Wired: http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/02/rim-ecosystems-blackberry-playbook/…

    • 2834 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: Caroll, J. (2000, April 14). Microsoft Violated US Monopoly Law, Rules Judge. Irish Times , p. 16.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brilski Case Summary

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, the remainder of the decision is divided between the conservative majority and the liberal minority as to whether business methods are per se unpatentable. The fractured nature of the decision raises important questions about the future direction of patent law.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 2 Rim

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There was a legal action between NTP and RIM over the intellectual property. RIM resolved the action. To protect its intellectual property, RIM agreed to pay $612.5 million to NTP Inc. to settle the fight. The dispute had threatened to end RIM's BlackBerry e-mail service to millions of users in the U.S. and has been the subject of a four-year patent battle between the two companies. Under the agreement, RIM received rights to NTP's patents going forward. RIM made a one-time payment to NTP. Even if the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office eventually overturned NTP's patents, NTP would not have to repay the $612.5 million. "There is no provision for the PTO re-exam. This is a full and final settlement," he said. RIM and NTP briefly agreed to settle the case for $450 million in March of 2005, but that deal later fell through. RIM thought the companies had come to a final agreement, but NTP believed the matter had never been finalized, and the litigation continued.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress passed the Sherman Act in 1890 in response to vast business combinations known as trusts that had emerged in an earlier “new economy,” the period of explosive growth in industry and transportation that followed the Civil War (Page, 2007). No antitrust case in recent history has attracted as much public attention as U.S. v. Microsoft Corp. Nor has any antitrust case in memory raised as many complex, substantive issues of law, economics, and public policy. This volume constitutes an early effort to analyze some of the central issues and to put the…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * To protect its intellectual property, RIM agreed to pay $612.5 million to NTP Inc. to settle the fight.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Steven S. Rubin, Patented Software, the Supreme Court & Abstract Idea Hearings, EE Times (July 10, 2014)…

    • 2739 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frivolous Lawsuits

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Although this article was published in 1992, it provided me with an abundance of facts for the history of litigation and how it exploded into such a large industry…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Miller, Claire Cain. “Apple’s Feud With Google Is Now Felt on iPhone.” New York Times. New York Times. 20 September 2012. Web. 24 September 2012.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays