Preview

Rene Descartes Senses Are Sometimes Deceptive Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Rene Descartes Senses Are Sometimes Deceptive Summary
Rene Descartes concludes that sometimes our own senses can be deceptive and misleading, however there are some experiences so simple and tangible that they cannot be denied as real or true. For this essay I will defend Descartes’ beliefs from the objection that even simple experiences can be deceiving and that no experiences should be trusted completely. The problem with this objection is that a person needs to be able to trust what they are experiencing, and without that everyone might as well be crazy. Descartes starts by saying that “senses are sometimes deceptive” (p.14)1 and then goes on to say “never to place our complete trust in those who have deceived us” (p.14) and finally “there are many other matters concerning which one simply

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Thus, they can be called into doubt. He is aware that if something deceives you at least one time, it will again, and therefore it cannot be trusted. This is evident when he states, “I have noticed that the senses are sometimes deceptive; and it is a mark of prudence never to place our complete trust in those who have deceived us even once” (14). This statement proves that Descartes believes that his senses’ reliability can be called into question. For example, he states that our senses are not always accurate when it comes to perceiving small and distant objects, because we may mistake a fly on the wall for a smudge if we do not look at it from a close enough distance. By doing this, Descartes discredits the first claim he makes, which says that you must believe what your senses tell you. Therefore, he has discovered that he cannot rely on his senses for his intended philosophical foundation upon which he wishes to build his…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    truth, accepting the sum of present consciousness which ultimately allows an evolutionary transition, transcending the Cartesian Dilemma, aka, Descartes' Mind/Body dualism. Although we are each a single individual, our minds and our bodies seem to exist in two separate worlds which operate on separate rules. The dilemma is unifying the two, made possible by transcending the duality entirely. This allows the emergence of de-limited spirit which then provides the world with a third path, the Path of Neo, the path of peace.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes’ arguments for his methods of doubt were things may not be as they seem based on the perception of our senses may be skewed, our dreams may lead us to believe that what we dreamed might be real and that what we know as God may be false or that God may be a demon instead.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    to make sense of our world, and that the ability to think mathematically was an…

    • 2381 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy Study Guide

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The aim of Descartes’ first meditation is to first rid the mind of opinion and to only believe what is true. The second goal of his is to begin to put sciences on a firm foundation. He plans on achieving these goals by using a methodological doubt process in which he will see if he can discover a basis or corrosive agent that can bring all his beliefs into doubt. He believes that once a belief can be doubted, all…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basic premises on which we rely to grasp reality are our senses. We hear Church bells ringing, see the mesmerizing colors of a rainbow, smell the aroma of a fresh batch of cookies, taste the pungent flavors of chili peppers, and physically touch the ground on which we at least perceive we are standing. Descartes presents a dream argument that the senses are deceitful and one cannot distinguish between dream and reality. First I shall dive into Descartes’ dream argument, then present Hetherington’s two ways of challenging the dream argument, and then finally provide my own viewpoint. The dream argument for skepticism is possible; but without believing the very foundations conceived from perception, there is nothing to lie back on, resulting in an unsettling life of no meaning.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first doubt that Descartes highlights is that of his senses. He says that all of the information he has received has been through his senses and that sometimes his senses mislead him. Descartes is sure in his existence. To him, this is impossible to doubt and he justifies this…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Belief in God

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In his groundbreaking work, Meditations on First Philosophy, the French philosopher Rene Descartes lays the groundwork for many philosophical principles by attempting to “establish a bold and lasting knowledge” (171)1. The foundations for knowledge Descartes established would go on to influence a plethora of other philosophers and philosophical works. Descartes argues in his meditations first from the point of view of complete skepticism, using skepticism as a tool in order to discover what is real. Through this method, Descartes explains the existence of man as a “thinking thing,” the capacity for human error, the overall trustworthiness of our senses, the existence of a physical world, the mind and body as separate entities, and the existence of an infinitely perfect God. Descartes uses a variety of premises to help back up his idea of a prefect God. The main idea concluded from these premises is that man alone could not have come up with the idea of infinite perfection, so the idea of God comes from God himself, thus proving his existence. Although his argument for the existence of God is the least strong of his philosophical arguments, I agree with Descartes because humans alone could not grasp the idea of infinity or an infinitely perfect being. I intend examine and defend Descartes’ explanation of the existence of God, propose valid counter-arguments and my own answers to those objections.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the Meditations, Descartes successfully establishes methodical doubt about math and all sensory information, however, his answer to the doubt cast by the Evil Demon ploy does not fully relieve the dilemma of skepticism that his intense application of doubt has brought forth. Ultimately, Descartes is unable to satisfactorily answer the Evil Demon doubt because his argument does not prove that God’s existence would not prevent the serious errors in judgment and perception caused by the Evil Demon doubt.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes argues throughout the meditations, that we should be sceptical of our perception of the external world, due to his belief that all of our perceptions of physical things are perceived by the senses. This is the case, Descartes argues, as our senses of the physical things in the external world can be deceived. Properties which physical things possess, can be lost, or changed. Descartes demonstrates this with a piece of hard wax, which aroused his senses in a variety of ways, including: smell, taste, touch and sound. Descartes then melts the wax, to witness the extinction of the properties he can sense.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First Evaluative Paper Samuel Rogers Intro to Philosophy 100 In this paper, I will explain and evaluate Descartes doubts that he raises on both about the external world as well as these disciplines on the basis of the Evil Spirt Argument. The first thing that I am going to do is to explain what Descartes’s project of the Meditations and the role of the method of doubt in that project. Then I will explain the Evil Spirit Argument in depth about each of the premises.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I shall argue that Descartes’ argument for scepticism, (Cartesian doubt) conveyed in his First Meditation through three stages of doubt, is the most compelling, and evaluate the reasons for this being so. • Written as a means for us to better understand what we know, not necessarily as a way for Descartes to discuss his own views on why we should be skeptical about everything, however the criticisms the Meditations produced can also be contested. To this extent, Descartes’ argument is most compelling as – despite the obvious criticisms – there are clearly still some elements which remain ambiguous or open to further discussion. In essence, within his first meditation concerning doubt, Descartes argues that we can be skeptical of a number of things, as our ideas of knowledge and existence itself could potentially be brought into question.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes, R, Murdoch, D. & Cottingham, J.The philosophical writings of Descartes, Volume 2. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes views in the Second Meditation is that he tries to clarify the nature of the human mind and how it is better known than the body. He has this theory of we’re just “existing” as in we’re just dreaming or being deceived by an evil demon of some sort. With that happening, he still concludes that we can imagine, hear, and see things. Although our sensory perceptions can be false, they’re still a part of our mind and our thinking. Descartes believes we should doubt our senses because they cannot be trusted and that you also cannot trust your imagination.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dream Argument

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes did not trust our senses for scientific foundations because they are not always accurate. He believed the knowledge we perceive of external objects through senses is susceptible to doubt. It is impossible to know if anything outside of us exists with just an understanding through senses. Therefore, scientific method could only come to us through the mind. In order to prove this theory and support his view he created three arguments in the first meditation: the “dream argument”, the “deceiving god argument”, and the evil demon argument.…

    • 895 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays