Reasons For and Against Regulating Sugary Drinks
Abstract
Regulations require thorough assessments by the government as contradictions may be considered as a violation of consumer justice. In quintessence, this essay evaluates the reasons for and against regulation of sugary drinks. It initially presents the advantages of reduced health difficulties as consumption of sugary beverages decline. It then highlights the economic benefits of lessened government expenses on medical facilities and increased income experienced by businesses. The disadvantages, in contrast, accentuated the mental fitness altered as a result of lower consumption levels; economic crisis and financial crunch of businesses. To finish, the essay clinches by suggesting means through which regulation could be influenced upon the consumers.
Reasons For and Against Regulating Sugary Drinks
A fine line needs to be drawn in the presence of government intervention or regulation in the lives of people as actions to develop essential initiatives may be categorised as an assault on consumer rights. Regulation is a notion, with or without the legal boundaries, employed in governing, guiding, or managing a task, establishment, or arrangement. Employed with sugary drinks, regulation acts as movements by the government to restrict its consumption in a certain or general manner. Regulation of sugary drinks publicizes various advantages and disadvantages as influential floodgate factors surface. This essay contrives to evaluate the contentions for and against the regulation of sugary drinks in the expanses of health, economic and business income.
Sugary drinks contain significant amount of calories and are distinguished as bad for health. Overconsumption may develop into obesity which in turn raises the risks of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD’s) such as diabetes and cancer. These diseases are bounded by knotty experiences and extensive complexity could result in deaths. For instance, a study performed by the University of Texas
Regulations require thorough assessments by the government as contradictions may be considered as a violation of consumer justice. In quintessence, this essay evaluates the reasons for and against regulation of sugary drinks. It initially presents the advantages of reduced health difficulties as consumption of sugary beverages decline. It then highlights the economic benefits of lessened government expenses on medical facilities and increased income experienced by businesses. The disadvantages, in contrast, accentuated the mental fitness altered as a result of lower consumption levels; economic crisis and financial crunch of businesses. To finish, the essay clinches by suggesting means through which regulation could be influenced upon the consumers.
Reasons For and Against Regulating Sugary Drinks
A fine line needs to be drawn in the presence of government intervention or regulation in the lives of people as actions to develop essential initiatives may be categorised as an assault on consumer rights. Regulation is a notion, with or without the legal boundaries, employed in governing, guiding, or managing a task, establishment, or arrangement. Employed with sugary drinks, regulation acts as movements by the government to restrict its consumption in a certain or general manner. Regulation of sugary drinks publicizes various advantages and disadvantages as influential floodgate factors surface. This essay contrives to evaluate the contentions for and against the regulation of sugary drinks in the expanses of health, economic and business income.
Sugary drinks contain significant amount of calories and are distinguished as bad for health. Overconsumption may develop into obesity which in turn raises the risks of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD’s) such as diabetes and cancer. These diseases are bounded by knotty experiences and extensive complexity could result in deaths. For instance, a study performed by the University of Texas
Bibliography: Arumugam, N. 2012, ‘Why Soda Ban Will Work In Fight Against Obesity; Food Regulations Have Proven Record’, Forbes [Online], viewed 23 August 2014. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/nadiaarumugam/2012/09/14/why-soda-ban- will-work-in-fight-against-obesity-food-regulations-have-a-proven-record/ Grynbaum, M. M. 2012, ‘Soda Makers Begin Their Push Against New York Ban’, The New York Times [Online], viewed 23 August 2014. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/02/nyregion/in-fight-against-nyc- soda-ban-industry-focuses-on-personal-choice.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 Ilardi, S. 2009, ‘Dietary Sugar and Mental Illness: A Surprising Link’, Psychology Today [Online], viewed 24 August 2014. Available at: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-depression-cure/200907/dietary- sugar-and-mental-illness-surprising-link Park, A. 2012, ‘Goodbye, Big Soda: New York Becomes First City to Ban Large-Sized Soft Drinks’, Time [Online], viewed 24 August 2014. Available at: http://healthland.time.com/2012/09/13/goodbye-big-soda-new-york- becomes-first-city-to-ban-large-sized-soft-drinks/