Racism and Contact Hypothesis
Getting Rid of Racism: Assessing Three Proposals in Light of
Psychological Evidence
Daniel Kelly, Luc Faucher, and Edouard Machery
At the end of a chapter in his book Race, Racism and Reparations, Angelo
Corlett notes that “[t]here remain other queries about racism [than those he addressed in his chapter], which need philosophical exploration . . . Perhaps most important, how might racism be unlearned?” (Corlett 2003, 93). We agree with
Corlett’s assessment of its importance, but find that philosophers have devoted relatively little attention to the issue of how to best deal with, and ultimately do away with, racism. Discussion is often confined to cursory remarks at the end of articles mainly devoted to defining “racism” or attempting to capture the essence of racism itself. In this article, we put the issue of how to best deal with racism front and center.
We need not start from scratch, however. Despite not being central to many philosophical discussions about race, a number of different strategies for dealing with racism have been suggested. We have identified three of the most concrete proposals made by philosophers and social theorists, each of which seeks to mitigate racism by inducing psychological changes in individuals.1 For each, we formulate the line of thought behind the strategy as clearly as we can, supply the psychological justification suggested by its respective advocates, and spell out how the strategy might be concretely applied in practice. Finally, we assess each proposal in light of current empirical work on racial cognition. We conclude that some proposals are likely to fare better than others. Furthermore, the empirical literature shows that even the most promising proposals can be refined in light of empirical findings, to help maximize their effectiveness or prevent them from backfiring.2 Something needs to be said about how we are conceiving of racism, and so what getting rid of it amounts to. Because our discussion
Psychological Evidence
Daniel Kelly, Luc Faucher, and Edouard Machery
At the end of a chapter in his book Race, Racism and Reparations, Angelo
Corlett notes that “[t]here remain other queries about racism [than those he addressed in his chapter], which need philosophical exploration . . . Perhaps most important, how might racism be unlearned?” (Corlett 2003, 93). We agree with
Corlett’s assessment of its importance, but find that philosophers have devoted relatively little attention to the issue of how to best deal with, and ultimately do away with, racism. Discussion is often confined to cursory remarks at the end of articles mainly devoted to defining “racism” or attempting to capture the essence of racism itself. In this article, we put the issue of how to best deal with racism front and center.
We need not start from scratch, however. Despite not being central to many philosophical discussions about race, a number of different strategies for dealing with racism have been suggested. We have identified three of the most concrete proposals made by philosophers and social theorists, each of which seeks to mitigate racism by inducing psychological changes in individuals.1 For each, we formulate the line of thought behind the strategy as clearly as we can, supply the psychological justification suggested by its respective advocates, and spell out how the strategy might be concretely applied in practice. Finally, we assess each proposal in light of current empirical work on racial cognition. We conclude that some proposals are likely to fare better than others. Furthermore, the empirical literature shows that even the most promising proposals can be refined in light of empirical findings, to help maximize their effectiveness or prevent them from backfiring.2 Something needs to be said about how we are conceiving of racism, and so what getting rid of it amounts to. Because our discussion
References: Allport, Gordon. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice, Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley. Amodio, David M., and Patricia G. Devine. 2006. “Stereotyping and Evaluation in Implicit Race Bias: Evidence for Independent Constructs and Unique Effects on Behavior.” Journal of Personality Amodio, David, Patricia Devine, and Eddie Harmon-Jones. 2007. “Mechanisms for the Regulation of Intergroup Responses: Insights from a Social Neuroscience Approach,” In Social neuroscience: Amodio, David M., Sarah L. Master, Cindy M. Yee, and Shelley E. Taylor. 2008. “Neurocognitive Components of the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Systems: Implications for Theories of Apfelbaum, Evan, Samuel Sommers, and Michael I. Norton. 2008. “Seeing Race and Seeming Racist? Evaluating Strategic Colorblindness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 1990. “Racisms.” In Anatomy of Racism, ed. David Theo Goldberg, 3–17. Aronson, Elliot, and Shelley Patnoe. 1997. The Jigsaw Classroom: Building Cooperation in the Classroom Bertrand, Marianne, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2003. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal?: A Field Experiment on Labor Market and Discrimination.” Poverty Action Lab Paper No. 3. Retrieved September 30, 2006, from http://povertyactionlab.org/papers/ bertrand_mullainathan.pdf. Bigler, Rebecca S. 1999. “The Use of Multicultural Curricula and Materials to Counter Racism in Children.” Journal of Social Issues 55: 687–705. Blum, Lawrence. 1999. “Race, Community and Moral Education: Kohlberg and Spielberg as Civic Educators.” Journal of Moral Education 28(2): 125–43. ———. 2009. “Prejudice.” In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education, ed. Harvey Siegel, 451–68 Brewer, Marilyn B. 1997. “The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations: Can Research Inform Practice?” Journal of Social Issues 53: 197–211. Brewer, Marilyn B., and Norman Miller. 1984. “Beyond the Contact Hypothesis: Theoretical Perspectives on Desegregation.” In Groups in Contact: The Psychology of Desegregation, ed. Norman Miller and Marilyn B Brophy, Ira N. 1946. “The Luxury of Anti-Negro Prejudice.” Public Opinion Quarterly 9: 456–66. Burgess, Diana Jill, Michelle van Ryn, John F. Dovidio, and Somnath Saha. 2007. “Reducing Racial Bias among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22(6): 882–87. Published online March 3, 2007. doi: 10.1007/s11606007-0160-1. Chang, Mitchell J., June C. Chang, and Maria C. Ledesma. 2005. “Beyond Magical Thinking: Doing the Real Work of Diversifying Our Institutions.” About Campus (May–June): 9–16. Clark, Kenneth B., Isidor Chein, and Stuart W. Cook. 1954. “The Effects of Segregation and the Consequences of Desegregation: A (September 1952) Social Science Statement in the Brown v. Cohen, Jacob. 1992. “A Power Primer.” Psychological Bulletin 112: 155–59. Cook, Stuart W. 1984. “The 1954 Social Science Statement and School Desegregation: A Reply to Gerard.” American Psychologist 39: 819–32. ———. 1985. “Experimenting on Social Issues: The Case of School Desegregation.” American Psychologist 40: 452–60. Corlett, J. Angelo. 2003. Race, Racism, and Reparations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Curtis, Valerie, Robert Aunger, and Tamer Rabie. 2004. “Evidence that Disgust Evolved to Protect from Risk of Disease.” Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Science Series B 271(4): Dixon, John, Kevin Durrheim, and Colin Tredoux. 2005. “Beyond the Optimal Contact Strategy: A Reality Check for the Contact Hypothesis.” American Psychologist 60: 697–711. ———. 2007. “Intergroup Contact and Attitudes toward the Principle and Practice of Racial Equality.” Psychological Science 13: 867–72. Dovidio, John F., Samuel L. Gaertner, and Kerry Kawakami. 2003. “Intergroup Contact: The Past, Present and the Future.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6: 5–20. Ellen, Ingrid Gould. 1998. “Stable Racial Integration in the Contemporary United States: An Empirical Overview.” Journal of Urban Affairs 20: 27–42. Eller, Anja, and Dominic Abrams. 2003. “ ‘Gringos’ in Mexico: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Effects of Language School-Promoted Contact on Intergroup Bias.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6: 55–75. Faucher, Luc, and Edouard Machery. 2009. “Racism: Against Jorge Garcia’s Moral and Psychological Monism.” Philosophy of Social Sciences 39: 41–62. Faulkner, Jason, Mark Schaller, Justin H. Park, and Lesley A. Duncan. 2004. “Evolved DiseaseAvoidance Mechanisms and Contemporary Xenophobic Attitudes.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 7(4): 333–53. Fessler, Daniel M. T., Serena J. Eng, and C. David Navarrete. 2005. “Elevated Disgust Sensitivity in the First Trimester of Pregnancy: Evidence Supporting the Compensatory Prophylaxis Hypothesis.” Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 344–51. Festinger, Leon, and Harold H. Kelley. 1951. Changing Attitudes through Social Contact. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research. Gaertner, Samuel L., and John F. Dovidio. 2000. Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model Gaertner, Samuel L., J. Mann, A. Murrell, and John F. Dovidio. 1989. “Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Benefits of Recategorization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57: Greenwald, Anthony G., T. Andrew Poehlman, Eric Luis Uhlmann, and Mahzarin Banaji. 2009. Goldman, Alvin. 1986. Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Govorun, Olesya, and B. Keith Payne. 2006. “Ego-Depletion and Prejudice: Separating Automatic and Controlled Components.” Social Cognition 24: 111–36. Harman, Gilbert. 1986. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Henry, P. J., and Curtis D. Hardin. 2006. “The Contact Hypothesis Revisited: Status Bias in the Reduction of Implicit Prejudice in the United States and Lebanon.” Psychological Science 17 Hewstone, Miles, and Rupert Brown. 1986. “Contact Is not Enough: An Intergroup Perspective on the ‘Contact Hypothesis’.” In Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters, ed Islam, Mir Rabiul, and Miles Hewstone. 1993. “Dimensions of Contact as Predictors of Intergroup Anxiety, Perceived Out-Group Variability, and Outgroup Attitude: An Integrative Model.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19: 700–10.