Preview

Questions: United States Constitution and Court Question Options

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6147 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Questions: United States Constitution and Court Question Options
Question 1 1 / 1 point
Commercial speech, such as advertising, is restricted far more extensively than expressions of opinion on religious, political, or other matters. True False
Question 2 1 / 1 point
The Bill of Rights allows a group to hold a spontaneous demonstration anytime, anywhere, and anyway it chooses. True False
Question 3 1 / 1 point
In the case of Roe v. Wade (1973), the Supreme Court outlawed any state laws to restrict a woman's right to an abortion at any point in her pregnancy. True False
Question 4 1 / 1 point
In the decades since the Miranda decision, the Supreme Court has made no exceptions to its requirements. True False
Question 5 1 / 1 point
Slander refers to making spoken statements known to be false that are malicious and tend to damage a person's reputation, and the courts have ruled that such spoken defamations are not protected by freedom of speech. True False
Question 6 1 / 1 point
The right to privacy is specifically guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. True False
Question 7 1 / 1 point
Nowhere does the Bill of Rights explicitly state that Americans have a right to privacy. True False
Question 8 1 / 1 point
The Fifth Amendment forbids forced self-incrimination, stating that no person "shall be compelled to be a witness against himself." True False
Question 9 1 / 1 point
The Courts have repeatedly supported the exercise of prior restraint. True False
Question 10 1 / 1 point
The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty violates the equal protection of the law guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. True False ttempt 1
Written: Jun 28, 2014 10:23 AM - Jun 28, 2014 10:30 AM
Submission View
Question 1 0 / 1 point
According to the text, there is no doubt that the revolutionary expansion of channels and Web sites anticipated in the near future is likely to enhance the political interest and involvement of young people. True False
Question 2 1 / 1 point
Public goods are things that everyone shares, such as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1) In 1973 the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Roe vs Wade that states could not e act an outright ban on abortions before the age of fetal viability…

    • 4110 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for an admission to be admissible in court, prior to interrogation, the individual must first be informed in clear and unequivocal terms that he has the right to remain silent. In addition, the warning to remain silent must be accompanied by the explanation that anything can be used against the individual in court, and that the individual has the right to have an attorney present during interrogation, and if they can not afford one, then one will be appointed to them. Also, if the individual waives his right to remain silent and for counsel to be present, the police must show that the waiver was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No. In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that a punishment of death did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments under all circumstances.…

    • 502 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fifth Amendment states that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. The Sixth Amendment states that, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the assistance of counsel for his defense (How to brief 2006)." The Supreme Court of the United States had made previous attempts to deal with these issues. In Brown v. Mississippi (1936), the Court had ruled that the Fifth Amendment protected individuals from being forced to confess. In Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Court held that persons accused of felonies have a fundamental right to an attorney,…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court consolidated four separate court cases with issues concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained during police interrogations. All the defendants in each of these occurrences offered incriminating evidence during interrogations from police and were not notified prior to the interrogations of their rights granted to them under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Miranda was arrested and taken into custody to a police station where he was identified by the witness. He was questioned for 2 hours by officers without being advised of his right to counsel and then signed a statement that said that his confession was voluntary. ISSUE: Whether the government is required to notify the detained individuals of their constitutional rights granted by the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination prior to the individuals being interrogated by the authorities and assistance of counsel and give a voluntary waiver of these rights as a necessary precondition to police questioning and the giving of a…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1966, as a result of the United States Supreme Court, Miranda v. Arizona established your “Miranda rights.” The Miranda rights are intended to protect an individual’s Fifth Amendment right to refuse to answer self incriminating questions.…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, ruled that the prosecution could not introduce Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal trial because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The police duty to give these warnings is compelled by the Constitution's Fifth Amendment, which gives a criminal suspect the right to refuse "to be a witness against himself," and Sixth Amendment, which guarantees criminal defendants the right to an attorney.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    152A final study guide

    • 2472 Words
    • 12 Pages

    1) In 1973 the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Roe vs Wade that states could not enact an outright ban on abortions before the age of fetal viability.…

    • 2472 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty violates the eight Amendment of the United States Constitution that forbids cruel and unusual punishment. John M. Sheb and John M. Sheb II wrote in their book Criminal Law and Procedure that the eight amendment of the United States Constitution has been employed to limit the definition of crime. The authors mentioned the case of Robinson v. California where the Supreme Court, relying on the cruel and unusual punishment clause, found it unacceptable the state law that made crime the use of narcotics. The law was struck down because the Court determined that one couldn’t be punished merely for status without committing a criminal act (Sheb, 70-71). The Death penalty practices serve to be inconsistent with the fundamental laws and values in America’s democratic system.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say may be used for or against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney now or at any time during questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to represent you, without cost, by the courts” (“Miranda v. Arizona.” West n.p.).…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defamation also called slander represents the use of words, statements that are negative that impact a reputation on a person. Most of the time, some people will recover from the hatred that is given from another person to the next. Words must be proven that the slander stated is true or untrue. Not for all cases, but defamation is a general term, while slander usually refers to something that is unspoken. This means it must be published for the general public or a large group of people.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before Roe vs. Wade were born/implemented; abortion was legal in several states in the United States. However, there were some…

    • 1680 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defamation

    • 5571 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Slander is a tort, or civil law, meaning a civil lawsuit can be brought against someone who is accused of slander. In the United States certain facts must be established for someone to be found guilty of slander. Assuming there is proof that the defendant uttered the alleged statement, the statement must be overheard by someone other than the subject or other “privileged” parties. Slander must also clearly identify the party or entity, and the intent must be…

    • 5571 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CBL: Libel Provision Info

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Generally, defamation is a false and unprivileged statement of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation, and published "with fault," meaning as a result of negligence or malice. Libel is a written defamation; slander is a spoken defamation.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Online Defamation

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Defamation is a false and unprivileged statement of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation, and published "with fault," meaning as a result of negligence or malice. State laws often define defamation in specific ways.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays