Preview

Online Defamation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
548 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Online Defamation
What Is Defamation?
Defamation is a false and unprivileged statement of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation, and published "with fault," meaning as a result of negligence or malice. State laws often define defamation in specific ways. Libel is a written defamation;
Slander is a spoken defamation. Online defamation is the publication of such statements made on any Internet based media including blogs, forums, websites, and even social networking websites. While many Internet users believe that they are free to say and do as they like while on the Internet, this is untrue and the same defamation laws and regulations stand for online defamation as they do in any form of media.
If you tweet, blog, tag or post, here are five steps to keep you out of defamation danger:
1 .Know what constitutes defamation. Just as its name suggests, defamation is when you defame another person through harmful statements about another person that you know or should know are false.
-Slander, when such statements are spoken, and libel, when they are written, are forms of defamation.
2) Stick to facts; avoid opinions that could be construed as facts.
Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but it's critical to distinguish the difference between opinion and fact. If you believe a politician lied about his or her campaign finances, for example, but it's not been proven, it's best to precede any verbal or written statements about that belief with the words "in my opinion." It's better yet to keep potentially defamatory thoughts to yourself.
3) No name-calling.
Even if you think the latest celebrity mistress is a home wrecker, name-calling can constitute character assassination. He or she may believe their paramour truly was separated at the time of the affair, in which case the home was already wrecked and your statement is false.
4) Let readers reach their own conclusions.
It's likely that when faced with the facts, the same facts you encountered, many of your

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first rule applied in this case was the rule of libel and slander, which states that the cause of defamation must include four elements: “1) a false and defamatory statement concerning the plaintiff; 2) an unprivileged communication to a third party; 3) fault by the defendant amounting at least to negligence; and 4) special harm of the actionability of the statement irrespective of special harm.” (822) Libel is the defamation of one’s character in written form, and slander is the…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “A statement is defamatory if it tends to expose the plaintiff to public hatred, contempt, ridicule or disgrace--that is, if it would tend to lead the average person in the community to form an evil or bad opinion of the plaintiff.” (Taken from LexisNexis, Esposito v SFX case)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr Wolf Research Paper

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The New app that protects residents from wolf menace in story book land has enhanced people protection against the big bad wolf. In line six-eight it says “Mr. Wolf is said to have destroyed two of the Three Little Pig’s homes with his horrible breath, and according to a police report he ate Grandma whole in order to deceive Little Red Riding Hood.” In this statement its libel (defamation) Mr. wolf is being accused of destroying the three little pigs home. This statement can bring harm to Mr. Wolf reputation as also stating he has horrible breath which also questions Mr. wolf hygiene. The principles of libel state whether the meaning of the defendant’s statement is defamatory. If the meaning is defamatory, whether or not the statement can be interpreted to actually have that meaning. This case is similar to John Zenger where he wrote an article slandering the Governor.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is a false statement; it is not defamatory because it does not suggest anything bad about the solicitor, just that he is not now practicing.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yes the grocery store many have violated the law of defamation if they do not have proof that the man was actually trying to steal. Until they have actual proof they cannot say that a person was stealing just because a person thought they saw him take something. Defamation is a statement that is not true that was made against another person to a third person that could tarnish a persons’ reputation. Defamation could be slander in oral or spoken form, and can also be libel which is written or broadcasted. Just because the employee saw Mr. Man pick up a few steaks, does not mean that he was going to try and steal them.…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    chapter 1 assignment

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The main difference between libel and slander is how it’s imposed. Libel is a written or recorded statement of facts about someone or business while slander is a spoken defamation of a person ro a business. (Clarkson, Miller, Cross, 2012, p. 119). A libel case deals with false statements that caused harm or damage such as destroying reputation and causing humiliation for the plaintiff. On the other hand slander case involves plaintiff claiming false or misleading statement that was verbally expressed about the plaintiff and it resulted in an economic or monetary loss for the plaintiff.…

    • 564 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is for this very reason that it is imperative that jurisdictions form a concrete basis in how to determine matters of jurisdiction. It appears that whilst Dow Jones has helped Australia develop a common practice in determining jurisdiction based on the place of harm cause and not the place of publication, the constitutional right of free speech in the US is constantly battling the right to protect ones reputation. As much of the population of the US believes freedom of speech to be the most fundamental of all constitutional rights this view does not adequately represent the beliefs of an ever increasing multicultural internet user…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever been labeled by people for doing something that you did not do? Another word for that is libel, libel is a false published statement that is meant to hurt a person's reputation. New York Times vs. Sullivan is a case where Sullivan sued New York Times for libel. The case went to the Alabama court ending in failure for New York Times, the case reached a final decision in the Supreme Court. Sullivan brought the case to the court claiming that New York Times committed libel and was purposely hurting his reputation as a public official.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction to Law

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is likely she could win a slander suit because the statement was false and it was printed with malice.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deamation Lawsuit Summary

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    To win a defamation lawsuit there are four elements that the plaintiff must prove; Defamation which are factual statements that are likely to harm someone’s reputation. The police officers argued that Mosby made statements that they deliberately ignored Grey’s injuries and cries for help. They stated in their lawsuit that this statement is defamatory because “they exposed Plaintiffs to public scorn, hatred and contempt, and thereby discouraging others in the community from having a favourable opinion of, or association with, Plaintiffs”. The second element is Falsity, the statements made must be false. Plaintiffs argue that Mosby did not have actual evidence to support her statement. The third element is Communicated, the statement made communicated…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For extreme cases of defamation of character, you may want to seek a personal injury lawyer. Personal injury lawyers are skilled at determined how best to handle these situations so that your reputation isn’t further…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    what is crime

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    of a criminal case. If I slander somebody, I might be dragged into court, and I might have…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employee Rights Case

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To begin with, one must review the state law to determine both employer and employee rights. This case occurred in Ohio, and after reviewing the state law, it is determined that employers are in fact protected from defamation lawsuits unless one of the following occurs. First, the protection is available unless the employer intentionally discloses information knowing that it was false before the disclosure. Second, if the employer deliberately intended to mislead the prospective employer by disclosing false information, which was conducted in bad faith, with malicious purpose, the protection is lost. Next, to dissect the facts of this case, Mr. Black was an employee of Usher Transport, in which was a previous employer that was contacted when…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 1

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page

    About the first woman, the statement published by Orange Daily is “Tommy Wan has had sex affairs with several women, including an actress“ and “The first runner-up in the1987 Singing Contest held by HKTV” . This refer to the actress who had sex with Tommy. The form of defamation is libel which published through newspaper. It doesn’t matter whether the publisher didn’t intend that meaning. What matters is what ordinary readers or viewers will make of it. Therefore, when reader go through the record of HKTV Singing Contest, the identity of the first women is revealed. The ordinary readers familiar with this famous person, will understand the article to be referring to her. This means the defamation refers to the claimant indirectly.…

    • 276 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fallacies

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the most common fallacies today, in which an argument is linked to a personal characteristic or belief to the opposition. It should not be confused with general name-calling or with legitimate concerns of the opposition’s motives for arguing.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics