Mr Wolf Research Paper
The WolfAway App
The New app that protects residents from wolf menace in story book land has enhanced people protection against the big bad wolf. In line six-eight it says “Mr. Wolf is said to have destroyed two of the Three Little Pig’s homes with his horrible breath, and according to a police report he ate Grandma whole in order to deceive Little Red Riding Hood.” In this statement its libel (defamation) Mr. wolf is being accused of destroying the three little pigs home. This statement can bring harm to Mr. Wolf reputation as also stating he has horrible breath which also questions Mr. wolf hygiene. The principles of libel state whether the meaning of the defendant’s statement is defamatory. If the meaning is defamatory, whether or not the statement can be interpreted to actually have that meaning. This case is similar to John Zenger where he wrote an article slandering the Governor. …show more content…
Wolf so lines six through eight should be removed. Also, sharing a police report about Mr. Wolf should never be in this article. This harms Mr. Wolf privacy as a resident of storybook land and it could as scare his residents. This is similar to an article we discuss in class about public records. In the article it showed how many people in the united states had permits to their weapons. This should not be public record and its shows lack of privacy. In lines ten through eleven it states The “WolfAway cell phone app has two functions to protect users from the Wolf. The first uses a global positioning chip secretly embedded in the Wolf’s hat to track him and show his location to users.” The wolf has been track with a chip without the wolf consent. This chip gives users functions of Mr. Wolf location. The principle is just illegal the chip cat be inserted without consent. In this case, to avoid legal problems just remove the chip
The New app that protects residents from wolf menace in story book land has enhanced people protection against the big bad wolf. In line six-eight it says “Mr. Wolf is said to have destroyed two of the Three Little Pig’s homes with his horrible breath, and according to a police report he ate Grandma whole in order to deceive Little Red Riding Hood.” In this statement its libel (defamation) Mr. wolf is being accused of destroying the three little pigs home. This statement can bring harm to Mr. Wolf reputation as also stating he has horrible breath which also questions Mr. wolf hygiene. The principles of libel state whether the meaning of the defendant’s statement is defamatory. If the meaning is defamatory, whether or not the statement can be interpreted to actually have that meaning. This case is similar to John Zenger where he wrote an article slandering the Governor. …show more content…
Wolf so lines six through eight should be removed. Also, sharing a police report about Mr. Wolf should never be in this article. This harms Mr. Wolf privacy as a resident of storybook land and it could as scare his residents. This is similar to an article we discuss in class about public records. In the article it showed how many people in the united states had permits to their weapons. This should not be public record and its shows lack of privacy. In lines ten through eleven it states The “WolfAway cell phone app has two functions to protect users from the Wolf. The first uses a global positioning chip secretly embedded in the Wolf’s hat to track him and show his location to users.” The wolf has been track with a chip without the wolf consent. This chip gives users functions of Mr. Wolf location. The principle is just illegal the chip cat be inserted without consent. In this case, to avoid legal problems just remove the chip