Preview

Purpose Of The Three Strike Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Purpose Of The Three Strike Law
The Three Strike Law is a law that was passed in 1994. The purpose of this law is to require the defendant extra time for their new felony because of a crime that was committed in the past. This law have been active for several years and it came with a lot of pros and cons. In this paper I will give my view on what I think the good and the bad is for this law.

I understand why the government started The Three Strike Law, but I disagree with this law because there are consequences that come with it. One of the problems with having this law is that prisoners can start to join gangs in jail because they do not have nothing else better to do. If someone is sitting in jail for many years and only have nothing but negative influences surrounding

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    For the following P4DB Key Assignment Draft, I will be discussing my thoughts on the three strikes laws, requirements, and the Ewing v. California case as it pertains to the three strikes law. Next, a few thoughts on how the public feels about crimes, both violent and non-violent, mandatory sentencing, and the discretion that prosecutors have during the sentencing process, will be discussed in detail. Following will be my thoughts regarding the scenario for reelection and how it pertains to the legal system today, along with developing a policy describing alternatives, protections against “load up” charges, and using multiple counts…

    • 3733 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DQ 4: Should juveniles who are arrested three or more times face mandatory incarceration sentences such as those contained in the three-strikes legislation?…

    • 435 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A longer prison sentence is nothing but a joke to the common criminal, with jails and prisons being so “comfortable” now. Any criminal that keeps his or her head down and their nose clean can get any sentence cut in half for “good behavior.” Not to mention the entire system is too crowded as is and society knows it.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The three strikes statutes are seen as a way to combat the nation 's crime problem. After Polly Klass was…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Beginning in the early 1990s, states began to enact mandatory sentencing laws for repeat criminal offenders. These statutes came to be known as "three strikes laws," because they were invoked when offenders committed their third offense. By 2003 over half the states and the federal government had enacted three strikes laws. The belief behind the laws was that getting career criminals off the streets was good public policy. However, incarceration of three strikes inmates for 25 years to life would drive up correctional costs. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld three strikes laws and has rejected…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “One punch” assaults known as “The King Hit” have cost over 90 lives since the year 2000. New South Wales have had the largest number of one punch assaults which is 28, followed by Queensland and Victoria who have recorded 24 cases each. Picture this, imagine a teenage boy who is having fun with his mates, and he gets “King Hit” by a stranger in which had taken his life. You would think that the killer would receive a very harsh prison sentence right? Well that isn’t always the case. One person who was a victim in a situation very similar to this. Thomas Kelly. Thomas Kelly is an 18 year old boy who was “King Hit” in Kings Cross in New South Wales. All it took was one punch to end his life. The attacker received a 4 year minimum prison sentence. The public was disgusted with the Australian justice system. These one punch offenders should receive a much higher prison sentence than others have had in previous years. How would you feel the person who killed your friend or family member would be walking out on the streets in only a few years time. There are three main points I am going make about this issue. They include: the prison sentencing is too low, victims family and friends pay the price and one punch assaults cause by alcohol and drugs.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The United States does not subject prisoners to cruel and unusual punishment as stated in the constitution…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea-Bargaining originally started in the early part of the nineteenth century with the violation of liquor laws. It is one of many issues viewed in the criminal justice system. It may or may not be beneficial to the accused person allowing them a lighter sentence. This paper will discuss definition of plea bargaining, distinguish between charge bargaining and sentence bargaining, compare and contrast the pros and cons associated with the use of plea bargains, and describing how plea bargaining reflects or thwarts the crime control and due process models of criminal justice.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    3 Strikes laws demand double the standard prison term for a second felony conviction, and mandatory sentences of 25 years to life for a 3rd conviction. For an example of this law in action, lets look at a few hypothetical criminals. Our first villain, lets call him Jerry, is an 18 year old caucasian male from Olympia. He is convicted of armed robbery after holding up a convenience store. After agreeing to a plea bargain, Jerry is sentenced to 2 years in state prison and 3 years probation. Most would agree this is a fair sentence. 6 years later, Jerry is charged with 2nd degree assault after breaking another mans jaw in a fight at a minor league baseball game in Tacoma. His friend Tom is also charged with 2nd degree assault after hitting an innocent bystander with a beer bottle during the same fight. Tom receives a 3 year sentence, followed by a years probation. After a jury trial, Jerry is sentenced to 8 years in prison for the same crime. Why, you may ask. The answer is simple. 3 strikes laws demand that because Jerry has a previous felony conviction, although more than half a decade previous and completely unrelated, he is subject to double the standard sentence for his “2nd Strike”.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Three strikes and you’re out”. This is the all too familiar term we are used to hearing in baseball and in the rules of the law in some states. Most heard of in California. Three strikes sentencing were adopted in 1994. It imposed longer prison sentences for repeat offenders. The law requires a person who is convicted of a felony and who previously has been convicted of one or more violent and/or serious felonies. The main feature of the Three Strikes law is the imposition of a life sentence for any felony conviction, no matter how minor, if the defendant has two prior "serious" felony convictions. "Serious" felonies are defined by the California Penal Code and range from murder and rape to non-confrontational residential burglary and purse-snatching.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He reiterates that criminals may get away with committing several crimes and not be convicted. This leads into his point that it’s certainly a large process to even get one conviction so those who are applicable under this law, it is safe to assume that they have committed far more crimes than just three (Messerli, 2012). This furthers the argument that those who are sentenced under the three strikes law are likely career criminals who are not willing to change their way of life for the justice system. With the current system of offenders going in and out the revolving door of the prisons, those offenders continue to get more opportunities to commit…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This article is a proposal to end the early release of violent criminals. Violent criminals continue to pose a major threat to society. Every year, the lives of thousands of citizens are shattered or taken by criminals who were released earlier than they should have. Many of these criminals have been incarcerated several times for the same crimes.…

    • 3693 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Surette, R. (1996). `News from Nowhere, Policy to Follow: Media and the Social Construction of Three Strikes and You 're Out. ' _Three Strikes and_ _You 're Out: Vengeance as Public Policy_, Thousand Oaks.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, as discussed by Alexander and Gyamerah, the mandatory minimum sentence for crack cocaine is much more severe than that for powder cocaine. This poses a greater threat to Blacks than to Whites. Likewise, the 3 Strikes Law, which significantly increases the severity of the punishment at the 3rd offense, is more threatening to people of lower class because such individuals are more likely to be caught for their actions due to higher police surveillance. One of main challenges that parolees face in their attempts to stay out of prison is recidivism – getting arrested again and sent back to prison. This challenge arises from a number of other challenges including the difficulty of finding housing, findings jobs and the strict conditions of parole.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your Safety or Theirs?

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One issue is the mandatory life prison sentence without the possibility of parole for "drug lords." Drug lords are individuals who control a sizable network of people involved in the illegal drug trade. They are responsible for the deaths of many innocent people, the high drug increase all over countries around the world, and the corruption of many governments. Individuals such as these people have the capability of destroying families and lives just for their own profitable gain. Which no one these days would be a fan of. My opinion about drug lords is to lock them up. Plain and simple. They have no care in the world for the public other than the need for their money and desire for that innocent corruption. Sending monsters like that to prison would definitely reflect the positive side of public-order. If there were more people who were motivated enough to pursue these cartels, society would not be so scared to go out and do the things we used to do. More gangs are involved in drugs now, more drugs can be seen on the streets, and a definite threat has increased in the back of the public 's mind. No one wants their child playing with dope or guns. Until the cartels are behind bars, there will always be that uneasiness.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays