Preview

Protective Orders In Arizona Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
460 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Protective Orders In Arizona Case Study
Protective Orders in Arizona

Protective Orders in Arizona
Suzi Austin
CJHS/430
Protective Orders in Arizona In the state of Arizona there are four types of protective orders ("Law.arizona.edu", n.d.). An emergency order can be requested when the life or health of a person is determined to by in immediate danger. The statute that governs this order is A.R.S. § 13-3624(C). It can be requested by a law enforcement officer and it is not required that the plaintiff be present. This type of order is limited to parties who meet specific relationship guidelines. An injunction against harassment, governed by A.R.S. § 12-809, has no relationship limitations; it is used to prevent acts of harassment which are not classified as domestic violence.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Castle Rock Vs Gonzales Case Study
    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Castle Rock Vs Gonzales Case Study

    Facts: In June of 1999 Jessica Gonzalez had her husband served with a protective order during divorce proceedings. The protective order stated the husband must stay 100 feet from the estranged wife and 3 young female children. It allowed for preannounced visitations and predetermined weekend custody. On several occasions the husband picked the children up without notice returning them late in the evening. Jessica reported each incident to the Castle Rock Police Department. The officers failed to respond to the calls telling Jessica to wait until the children were returned. The last time the children were taken without notice Jessica went to the police…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hurbert Gene Evans Film Analysis
    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hurbert Gene Evans Film Analysis

    As it relates to harassment, which is “when a person purposely and without legitimate purpose, has personal contact with another person, with the intent to threaten, intimidate or alarm that other person” (State v Evans, 2003). Evans claimed that at no time did he threaten Arnold he only wanted her to take pictures. The courts advised that threaten the victim is not a necessary element of the harassment statute. However, there is substantial evidence that proves Evans intended to alarm or intimidate Arnold. Starting with when he showed up to her home uninvited on August 31 and asking her to play a dominant role in a picture. Evans behavior would easily cause Arnold to feel frightened or in danger. This act was proven when Evans showed up to Arnold’s home in women’s shoes with red toenails. This behavior would be alarming and bizarre. The elements of stalking were met when Evans continued with his persistent questioning which was sexual in nature. This conduct continued with the unexpected encounters at Arnold’s home. Evans purposely engaged in the course of conduct that would reasonably put in person in fear of bodily injury. Evans behavior began to escalate in which Arnold she had to flee from Evans. Given Evans repeated attempts to photograph Arnold, her immediate refusals and the bizarre sexual nature of…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona Case Brief
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona Case Brief

    Miranda V. Arizona is case where Mr. Ernesto Miranda who was suspected for kidnapping and rape of 18 years old woman. After Mr. Miranda is arrested and identified by victim, police interrogated him for two hours and he confessed the crime. However at time he signed a confession he was not aware of his rights. No one told him his rights to remain silent nor informed him that his statement would be used against him. Although, when he put his confession into written form, across the form was printed disclaimer that stated that suspect was confession is voluntary, with no threats or any promises for immunity and of full knowledge of legal rights. Also that he know that everything he wrote can be used against him.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Oklahoma Justice System Case Study
    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Oklahoma Justice System Case Study

    Everyone deserves a good lawyer even people who have done terrible things such as terrorism rape and murder. Lawyers who take up these cases however face personal danger in the way of threats, attacks on them and attacks on their family and friends, and the effects last even after the treats stop coming they will lose business because they are seen as a person defending the actions of their client and not what they are actually doing which is them defending the rights of their client. Because of these factors some long term effects it will have on the justice system is that more and more lawyers won't be willing to take on the hard / controversial clients which causes a weakening of the judicial system in its entirety. After the Oklahoma…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Yale Enforcement Services, Inc.: A Case Study
    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Yale Enforcement Services, Inc.: A Case Study

    on a browser that may not be fully compatible with Microsoft Silverlight. You can still try to install by clicking below or you can refer to the System Requirements for more information.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Miranda v. Arizona case: How it changed law enforcement
    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Miranda v. Arizona case: How it changed law enforcement

    The "Miranda rule," which makes a confession inadmissible in a criminal trial if the accused was not properly advised of his rights, has been so thoroughly integrated into the justice system that any child who watches television can recite the words: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney" Yet the 1966 Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. Arizona remains the subject of often heated debate, and has had a great impact on law enforcement in the U.S.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    chjs 430 week 3 protective order
    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages

    chjs 430 week 3 protective order

    Once an individual has been harmed by another individual and wishes to seek help from law enforcement they have the legal right to request legal protection. In fact, the victim has the legal right under the eye of the law to go to court to request a personal protection order for not only themselves, but anyone that lives in the home as well. The victim also has the legal right to obtain any copies of any incidents that has happens regarding the abuser and the victim from the police, and also receive a several documents of information regarding services that surround emergency shelters and counseling services for victims of domestic abuse. If a victim has been violated while under a personal protection order at the hands of the abuser the victim has the right to return to court to file a motion to show cause and hearing if the individuals was not apprehended by law enforcement. However, the victim does not have the full legal right to physically…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    This case had to do with an Ernest Miranda who raped a Patty McGee*. After extracting a written confession from the rapist about the situation, Miranda's lawyer argued that it was not valid since the Phoenix Police Department failed to read Miranda his rights, also in violation of the Sixth Amendment which is the right to counsel. Some factors that helped support Miranda's arguments were that the suspect had requested and been denied an opportunity to consult with a lawyer; the suspect had not been effectively warned about his right to remain silent; and an incriminating statement must have been given by the suspect. The author of the Arizona court's decision, former U.S. Senator and Arizona governor Ernest W. McFarland, said that Miranda had not requested a lawyer at the time of his detention and therefore was not entitled to the protections offered by such thins as in the Escobedo vs. Illinois case.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona
    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona

    This case is one that changed the way the United States Police forces will work forever. Every human in the world has natural born rights. Even people who have been arrested have rights, ‘The rights of the accused’. These rights are the main point of this court case.…

    • 2657 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule And Miranda V. Arizona
    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Exclusionary Rule And Miranda V. Arizona

    The Exclusionary Rule was put in place to prevent the government from using evidence that was gathered illegally in violation of the United States Constitution. Evidence that was obtained from an unreasonable search and seizure that violates the Fourth Amendment or Fifth Amendment are found admissible in court under the Exclusionary Rule, if no exceptions apply. The establishment of the Exclusionary Rule was due to the rulings of several Supreme Court cases where it was found unconstitutional for evidence from an illegal search and seizure to be used against someone in court. The Exclusionary Rule is very important, as the evidence that can or cannot be used during a criminal trial can completely alter the ruling of a case.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona
    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda V. Arizona

    The majority does not perform the greatest ability to protect all members of a society. In the case of Miranda v Arizona, the courts had to decide whether or not a man was deprived of his freedoms while in police custody. Basically Miranda v Arizona completely changed the way police apprehend and interrogate suspects. However it was not only Miranda, but many other instances where the majority has not protected all minorities. Vignera v New York was another similar instance where a suspect was forced to sign statements and an inculpatory statement, while being questioned by police, without knowing he was entitled to legal representation. In California v Stewart, local police held and interrogated the defendant for 5 days,…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Permanent Restraining Order
    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Permanent Restraining Order

    A permanent restraining order will protect victims of certain crimes like child abuse, domestic abuse, harassment, stalking, sexual assault, and some other offenses. They are also common in some cases of divorce, especially when the divorce is based upon a history of repeated abuse.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Restraining Order In Court Cases
    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Restraining Order In Court Cases

    Once the request is administered, the protection order can prohibit the offender from making contact with the victim; the offender must remove themselves from the premise and stay away from areas the victim might be; the order can also play a role in the custody of children involved, such as having the children stay with the victim and not the offender; the order can also give provisional proprietorship to any possessions owned by both parties to the victim (Weisberg, 2015). Finally, the Interstate Stalking Punishment and Prevention Act of 1996 allowed protection orders violations to be a federal crime across all state lines (Burgess, Regehr, & Roberts, 2013, p. 345). Though…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Consequences Of Aggravated Assault
    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page

    Consequences Of Aggravated Assault

    According to Gosselin (2014), defendants charged with aggravated assault for domestic violence court outcomes were the same as or more severe than the court outcomes for non-domestic violence cases. As well, domestic violence offenders received more convictions and longer sentences than non-domestic violence defendants. Based on a study involving aggravated assault cases, perpetrators of domestic assaults are less likely to be granted release from jail while the criminal case is pending known as a pretrial release than those defendants of non-domestic cases and the courts are more likely to issue protective orders for aggravated domestic assaults (Gosselin, 2014). The courts often issue a protective order against those defendants charged with aggravated domestic assault if the judge grants a pretrial release.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harassment And Domestic Violence Lawyers
    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page

    Harassment And Domestic Violence Lawyers

    Our team of expert Harassment and Domestic Violence Lawyers will provide you of the options and actions you can take if you are experiencing spousal abuse, violent criminal threats, battery, child abuse, harassment, violation of restraining orders, and annoying, harassing or threatening phone messages and calls, among others. We will help you decide the best way to handle your particular situation, while ensuring you and your children's protection and safety.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics