Preview

Miranda V. Arizona

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Miranda V. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona
American Government

This case is one that changed the way the United States Police forces will work forever. Every human in the world has natural born rights. Even people who have been arrested have rights, ‘The rights of the accused’. These rights are the main point of this court case.
‘On the third of March in 1963, an eighteen year old girl, “Lois Ann Jameson” (Sonneborn 6), was leaving Paramount Theaters in downtown Phoenix’ (Sonneborn 7). Jameson would always take the bus home and have to walk a short distance to her home. On this night, she would be walking home and a car pulled up past her nearly hitting her. She continued walking not realizing that a man had gotten out and was running towards her. He grabbed her around the waist and covered her mouth, taking her back to his car. The assailant then tied her by her hands and feet and proceeded to drive into the desert. The man later stopped the car, got into the back seat, undressed Lois, and raped her. After that he then drove her back into her neighborhood and dropped her off a few houses down from her home. As she left he said, ‘Whether you tell your mother or not is none of my business, but pray for me,’ (Sonneborn 7).
Lois ran to door banging and screaming, her sister answered the door and Lois tells her what has been done to her. Sarah, her sister, called the police and at 2:08 am an officer arrived. Lois described the assailant as the following, “He was a Mexican man about twenty-seven or twenty-eight with a slight build. He was unshaven and was wearing glasses, jeans, and a t-shirt,” (Sonneborn 8). The next day, the police had her look at a line up of five possible men. But, none of them were her attacker. A polygraph test was done on Lois to se if she was telling the truth, but it was inconclusive.
After she had been raped, Lois was terrified to walk home alone again. So her brother-in-law said he would walk her home every night. On March 9th, a week later, he was waiting for her

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Elizabeth Loftus talked about a restaurant manager named Steve Titus who lived in Seattle, Washington. Steve Titus was 31 years old and engaged to a woman who was the love of his life named Gretchen. The couple had gone out for a romantic meal. On their way home they were pulled over by a police officer. Titus’s car resembled a vehicle that had been seen earlier in the evening. His car resembled that of a man who had raped a female hitchhiker. Titus resembled the rapist. The police took a picture of Titus and showed it to the rape victim. She said that he was the closest to the man she had seen. The police and prosecution proceeded with the trial. When Steve Titus was put on trial for rape, the rape victim had gotten on the stand. She said that she was sure that he was the man who had raped her. Titus was convicted and sent to jail. Titus had completely lost fail in the legal system, but he got an idea. Titus called a local newspaper and had gotten the interest of an investigative journalist. The journalist actually had found the real rapist. The rapist had confessed to the rape and was thought to have committed 50 rapes in that area. When the information was given to the judge, Titus was set free. But it didn’t end there. Steve Titus had lost his job, his fiancée, and his entire savings. Titus filed a lawsuit against the police and others he felt were responsible for his suffering. He had become obsessed with his trial. Days before he was to have his day in court, he woke up in the morning and doubled over in pain. He had died of a stress related heart attack at age…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Miss America By Day, Marilyn Van Derbur told her story of incest, that she experienced throughout her childhood. She explained how she was sexually abused by her father, from age 5 to the time she was 18 years old, when she was able to leave her home and go off to college. Marilyn wrote about how her father would come into her room, at least once a week, to molest or rape her. The visits became more frequent when she was a teenager. She would lie awake in her bed, curled up in a tight fetal position, anticipating when he would come into her room and violate her. When he would come in at night, she would pretend she was sleeping throughout the whole defilement. The waiting was very traumatic for her on its own, because even if he didn’t come in a particular night, she still wouldn’t be able to go to sleep or relax her body from the fear of his next “visit.”…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arizona vs Miranda

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Early in 1963, a 17 years old woman was kidnapped and raped in Phoenix, Arizona. The police investigated the case, and soon found and arrested a poor, and mentally disturbed man. The name of this man was Ernesto Miranda. Miranda was 23 years old when he was arrested. On March 13, 1963, Miranda was arrested based on circumstantial evidence linking him to the kidnapping and the rape. After 2 police officers interrogated him for 2 hours, he signed a confession to the rape charge. The form he signed included the following statement:…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The case of Miranda v. Arizona dealt with the question, “Does the police practice of interrogating individuals without notifying them of their right to counsel and their protection against self-incrimination violate the Fifth Amendment?” This case started in 1963, when Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona for robbing $8 from a bank worker, and was charged with armed robbery. He already had a record for armed robbery, and a juvenile record including attempted rape, assault, and burglary. While Miranda was in police custody, he signed a written confession to the robbery, and also to kidnapping and raping an 18-year-old woman 11 days before the robbery. After being convicted, Miranda’s lawyer appealed; on the basis that the defendant did not know he was protected from self-incrimination and therefore did not have to confess to his crimes.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 13th, 1966, the Supreme Court announced its 5-4 ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case. This ruling established “Miranda Rights,” a standard police procedure which revolves around the principle that an arresting officer must advise a criminal suspect of his or her rights before being taken into custody and interrogated. The Court’s ruling in this landmark case effectively reinforced the importance of ensuring that the accused are aware of their Fifth Amendment rights. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that no one can be forced to testify against himself; defendants in criminal cases can choose to remain silent, "pleading the Fifth," rather than offering testimony that might be used to convict them (Shmoop Editorial Team).…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fifth Amendment which in 1934 the “which protects a defendant from being compelled to be a witness against themselves” (Wright, 2013). The self-incrimination portion of the Fifth Amendment was tested case of Miranda v. Arizona. This is the same case that leads to the Miranda Warning. The Miranda warning is an “explanation of rights that must be given before any custodial interrogation” so that self-incrimination will not be a factor. No person can be compelled to openly admit to a crime. They cannot try to pry information out of someone if they have not been read their rights or if they ask for their attorney. It is a different story though is someone just starts rambling on when they are not asked. “Suspects can reinitiate an interrogation by coming forward and indicating to police they wish to talk and are willing to waive their Miranda rights. If there is a break in detention, the police may reinitiate the interrogation after fourteen days” (Wright, 2013).…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On March 13, 1963, eight dollars in cash was stolen from a Phoenix, Arizona bank worker, Police suspected and arrested Ernesto Miranda for committing the theft. Eleven days earlier, an 18- year old woman was kidnapped and raped in Phoenix, Arizona. The police investigated the case but didn't have any leads as to a suspect. During two hours of questioning Ernesto Miranda on the theft charge, without never being offered a lawyer, he confessed not only to the eight dollars theft, but also to kidnapping and raping an eighteen year old woman eleven days earlier. The police arrested the poor, and mentally disturbed man. This case would become well known in American constitutional studies. Miranda was 23 years old when he was arrested. By confessing to the crime, Miranda was convicted for kidnapping and rape and sentenced to twenty years in prison.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inmates In Jail

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The author’s purpose is to inform individuals that no human being takes birth as a criminal. Cases in which police, prison guards and other law enforcement authorities used excessive force or other tactics to violate victims’ civil right. It increased from fiscal years 1960’s, according to the Time Magazine. The composer’s primary audience is a prisoner. It made me think so because police brutality has been around since the police have been around. Although most people generally think of the highly publicized riots in the 1960s, police brutality occurred well earlier that and still happens currently. This form of police misconduct occurs when a police officer intentionally uses excessive force, and is usually physical rather than verbal. There are unfortunately many examples of police brutality that have happened over the past decades. The author’s secondary audiences might be prison guards. The writer…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Picking Cotton

    • 3383 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The Police Department of Alamance County had never seen a victim so composed, so determined and so sure. Just a few hours after her horrifying ordeal, after the emotionless doctor swabbed her vagina for semen samples at the hospital, Jennifer sat down at the police station with Detective Mike Gauldin. "The first comment I remember her making was that, “I'm going to get this guy that did this to me.” She said, “I took the time to look at him. I will be able to identify him if I'm given an opportunity," Gauldin remembered her saying (Hansen, 2001). She began combing through photos, trying to help come up with a composite of her rapist.…

    • 3383 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda Law

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages

    * Michael Burgan, Miranda V. Arizona: The Rights of the Accused. Compass Point Books, 2006.…

    • 1709 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Miranda Warning is intended to protect the guilty as well as the innocent and should be protected at all costs. Without the law, many suspects may be treated unfairly. It is a necessary safeguard. Its intentions were to give suspects an informed choice between their freedom of speech, their right not to speak, but be silent, and the prevent statements being given in a non-voluntary nature. Since the law was imposed police policies and procedures were promoted and enforced that effectively imposed safeguards throughout law enforcement agencies. However, with any law there is also discourse. In this essay I plan to give a brief summary of Miranda and discuss the advantages and disadvantages that Miranda provides for suspects and law enforcement officials.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona is case where Mr. Ernesto Miranda who was suspected for kidnapping and rape of 18 years old woman. After Mr. Miranda is arrested and identified by victim, police interrogated him for two hours and he confessed the crime. However at time he signed a confession he was not aware of his rights. No one told him his rights to remain silent nor informed him that his statement would be used against him. Although, when he put his confession into written form, across the form was printed disclaimer that stated that suspect was confession is voluntary, with no threats or any promises for immunity and of full knowledge of legal rights. Also that he know that everything he wrote can be used against him.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case of Terry v. Ohio is considered to be a landmark case because it is “understood to validate the practice of frisking (or patting down) suspects for weapons under diverse circumstances” (www.flexyourrights.org). These circumstances that allow for warrantless searches are applied only if and when an officer feels that peoples lives could be at risk, or if there is enough cause to believe that “a crime is in the process of being committed, a crime has already been committed, or that a crime was about to be committed” (Justice Douglas, dissenting, Terry v. Ohio). The case of Terry v. Ohio set a precedent for future cases because it changed the way searches and seizures were to be conducted and properly obtaining evidence through the use of warrants.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for kidnapping and rape. Arizona police took him to the police station and interrogated him for two hours. After the interrogation, Mr. Miranda had confessed to the crimes, and provided officers with a written confession. Language at the top of the written confession stated that the confession was given freely and voluntarily without any threats or promises. In addition, the language stated that Mr. Miranda was fully aware of his legal rights. However, Mr. Miranda was not advised that he could remain silent and have an attorney present at the interrogation. Subsequently, the statement was entered into evidence at trial, and Mr. Miranda was convicted and sentenced to prison.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study On Ann Nyberg

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is an in-depth television interview conducted by Ann Nyberg from LIN Television with a raped victim, Amy. Amy was raped by a 27-year-old Mexican guy who was her acquaintance at work when she was 25-year old. This interview was conducted three years after Amy was raped in 2009. In this interview, I think that Ann Nyberg did a very good job while interviewing Amy.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays