Preview

Pros And Cons Of The Treaty Of Versailles

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of The Treaty Of Versailles
The Treaty of Versailles came to be at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 and with its signing officially ended World War 1. The conference was attended by the heads of state from Great Britain, France, the United States and Italy where everyone signed and joined the League of Nations except the United States. Ultimately, the United States Congress refused to ratify the treaty even though President Wilson was a supporter of the League of Nations. Was it because Senator Lodge loathed President Wilson or was it because he actually believed that joining would do more harm than good for the United States? President Wilson came to the conference with what he called his 14 points. His points called for a world that would continue to remain intact. …show more content…
The Senate, now led by the Republican Party, held the power of passing the treaty (Lenger.) Senator Henry Cabot Lodge would lead the debate against the League of Nations starting on February 28 1919. Senator Lodge was accepting of the idea of the League of Nations however, he did not agree with the stipulations the conference imposed on the League. He believed that joining the League would cause us to end up in more wars, that the United States would not have the ability to leave the League and that our country would be flooded with immigrants (Lenger.) Senator Lodge also had a personal vendetta against President Wilson. While Senator Lodge added amendments to the treaty, these did not please President Wilson. President Wilson asked Democrats to vote against the amended version unless the amendments were dropped. The plea of Senator Lodge was heard by the Senate and they rejected the motion to join the League of Nations. President Wilson went to the Paris Peace Conference with high hopes for his 14 points, only to be stonewalled by his own
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Woodrow Wilson Wouldnt Yield
    • 541 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Woodrow Wilson Wouldnt Yield

    After reading Thomas A. Bailey’s article on “Woodrow Wilson Wouldn’t Yield”, I feel this quote best represents exactly what Woodrow Wilson stood for. He was a man who wanted peace and would not yield for anyone or any country unless it was best for him and our country. In Tomas A. Bailey’s article, his argument that Wilson’s fourteen points and most notably the League of Nations wasn’t passed not just because of the points themselves. But because of Wilson’s failure to see little changes and revisions to his plans, the League would have fallen through, instead of pitfall in the Senate like it did. “On March 4, 1919 - 39 Senators or Senators-Elect, more than enough to defeat the treaty-published a round robin to the effect that they would not approve the League of Nations in its existing form. Bailey also argues that Wilson’s character, in that his huge desire for morality and idealism, we also much to blame for his stubbornness in keeping the League of Nations unrevised or compromised upon.…

    • 541 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Euro: Mchapter 26 Outline
    • 8194 Words
    • 33 Pages

    Ap Euro: Mchapter 26 Outline

    * President Wilson saw the problems that arose with the treaty and placed hopes in the League of Nations…

    • 8194 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Wilson's 14 Points?
    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Wilson's 14 Points?

    The Senate had collectively rejected the treaty twice and it was defeated. Document E represents a political cartoon where the US Senate stops Wilson from creating foreign entanglements or the “wedding”. However, Wilson stubbornly decided to settle the treaty issue in the presidential campaign of 1920. W.E.B. Du Bois mentioned in “The League of Nations”, “Because of the idiotic way in which the stubbornness of Woodrow Wilson and the political fortunes of the Republicans became involved, the United States was not represented.”(Document H), for it really seemed like Wilson was only trying to get his way. If voters elected a Democrat, then this would mean the treaty was actually supported. The Republicans chose Senator Warren G. Harding as their presidential candidate for the election of 1920. Their vice-presidential candidate was Governor Calvin Coolidge. Democrats nominated Governor James. M. Cox for president (who was pro-league) and they chose Franklin D. Roosevelt for vice-president. Ironically, Warren Harding won the election of 1920 which led to the final death of the League of Nations. The reason why stubbornness was NOT the greater cause of the treaty’s defeat, is that the stubbornness was only the “icing on the cake” for the political battle between oppositions prevented it or Wilson would have had his…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Woodrow Wilson Justified Dbq
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Woodrow Wilson Justified Dbq

    The United States had entered World War I against many wishes of the American public, which made the ratification for the peace agreement an even more difficult task. Woodrow Wilson justified American involvement by claiming that an Ally victory would ensure a new world order. The war would be used as an instrument to "make the world safe for democracy". However, many Americans, government officials, and even the Allies did not agree with the progressive ideals that would be enforced to attain the peace that Wilson had desired and promised. This was made evident when Wilson's negotiations for the peace treaty were criticized and rejected by the leaders of the other Allied nations and isolationists. Even when Wilson acknowledged objections against his proposals, he refused to accept any compromises or different versions of the treaty. Therefore, both the inflexibility of Wilson and strength of the opposition forces led to the defeat of the Treaty of Versailles.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Progressive Woodrow Wilson's Foreign Policy After World War I
    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Progressive Woodrow Wilson's Foreign Policy After World War I

    Coming out of World War I, the United States emerged as the most powerful nation in the world. The president at this time was the Progressive Woodrow Wilson. Wilson came up with a plan for long lasting peace at the conclusion of the war called the Fourteen Points. One of these points was the League of Nations which was Wilson's favorite thing. This part of Wilson's plan stated, "A general association of nations must be formed under specific covenants for the purpose of affording mutual guarantees of political independence and territorial integrity to great and small states alike." However, the United States never signed the Treaty of Versailles and never became a member of the League of Nations. Opposition against Wilson's plans…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles Dbq Essay
    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Treaty Of Versailles Dbq Essay

    Ironically the League of nation’s answer for world peace was the main cause of World War II. Germany loss World War I and was forced to sign the Treaty of Versailles, saying that there would not be anymore wars ever. The Treaty of Versailles was created at the end of World War I in hopes to keep world peace; both the Allied Powers and the Central Powers signed the treaty and agreed to keep the peace with one another. The Treaty of Versailles was a great idea on paper, but unfortunately it helped cause World War II. The Treaty of Versailles helped cause World War II by taking land away from Germany, limiting the size of Germany’s military, pushing war reparations on Germany, and using the War Guilt Clause against the Germans.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Woodrow Wilson Enter Ww2
    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did Woodrow Wilson Enter Ww2

    First, The League Of Nations was established postwar in order to keep the peace. Although the United States President Woodrow Wilson was an enthusiastic proponent of the League, the United States did not officially join the League of Nations due to opposition from congress men who believed that the United States should remain apart from the affairs and interests, especially politically, of other countries. In January of 1918, President Wilson announced his plan of the fourteenth point plan, which he believed would transform the world politic issues. Wilson believed that affairs between nations should be conducted in the open, on the basis of self-determination, and the rejection of military force to settle issues. These ideas became large components of the League of Nations. Many may argue that the League of Nations failed,…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Influenza Affect 1918-1919
    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did The Influenza Affect 1918-1919

    President Wilson’s arrived to the post-war Paris Peace Conference in 1919 hopeful to negotiate his “Fourteen Points,” which were the terms that Germany had agreed to sign the armistice for, into the finalized version of the peace…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Articles of Confederation and Founding Fathers Energy
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Articles of Confederation and Founding Fathers Energy

    Roche believed the delegates at the Convention were divided into two groups – the federalists and the anti-federalists. The federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton. They believed the Constitution should be federalism, and it was good enough.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Treaty Of Versailles
    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dbq Treaty Of Versailles

    GREAT DEBATE (1919-1920): Versailles Treaty and League of Nations. Should the United States ratify the Versailles Treaty and join the League of nations?…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    League Of Nations Dbq
    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    League Of Nations Dbq

    President Woodrow Wilson, went up against Senator Henry Cabot Lodge who was the Republican majority leader and chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. The Treaty of Versailles, and with it the League of Nations, was rejected by the US Senate. As a result, the United States refused to play a role in preventing the overthrow of Europe by Adolf Hitler during the World War.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did The Treaty Of Versailles Embody The Principles Of The Fourteen Points
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did The Treaty Of Versailles Embody The Principles Of The Fourteen Points

    So to start off with what the question is asking, it’s asking why was it so hard for Wilson to have his own allies to accept the Fourteen Point. The Fourteen Points were statements of peace negotiations to help end the war. In the beginning, the Europeans agreed to these terms but…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Primary Source Analysis Example
    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Primary Source Analysis Example

    The source is a speech delivered by Woodrow Wilson on January 8th 1918; the speech was delivered among Woodrow’s fellow congressmen in the American congress. However, the speech was not written purely by Wilson, During World War I, Walter Lippmann became an adviser to President Woodrow Wilson and assisted in the drafting of the speech. The several points covered in Wilson’s speech aimed to resolve territorial issues in Europe, as well as improving post-war American diplomacy. To achieve this Wilson supported the League of Nations which was set up following the end of war. The speech therefore was not focused purely for American congress, but instead the International stage.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Was Woodrow Wilson Responsible For The League Of Nations
    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Was Woodrow Wilson Responsible For The League Of Nations

    Carleton argues Wilson was not responsible for the failure of joining the League because Carleton felt that even if Wilson had agreed to the Lodge Reservation, how sure are we that by Wilson joining in, it would have been enough for America to get in the League? Carleton points out, “Under the Lodge Reservation, every signatory nation had to accept them before the United States could become a member” (194). He uses this proof to support his claim that if Wilson had agreed with the Lodge, but the U.S. still didn’t make it into the League because not all fifteen nations agreed to let us in, would we still be blaming Wilson? Carleton also states that if Wilson was as stubborn as he was made out to be, then he would have been a joke for a president. He was accused of not understanding world politics but in that day, what American statesman understood world politics more than Wilson? Carleton also dismissed the fact that Wilson was accused of not being able to compromise. He stated “If the truth of this accusation must rest on Wilson’s attitude during the Treaty fight, and I think it must, for he showed remarkable adaptability in other phases of his Presidency” (194-195). Given the situations Wilson was in as a president, from the stroke to dealing with the League, Wilson has had no choice but to adapt and compromise with certain situations. Carleton ends his claim with the focus more on Lodge because he procrastinated votes on the treaty for two weeks and made it…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Weaknesses and Failure of the League of the Nations
    • 3546 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Weaknesses and Failure of the League of the Nations

    The League's supposed neutrality tended to manifest itself as indecision. It required a unanimous vote of its nine-, later fifteen-, member Council to enact a resolution; hence, conclusive and effective action was difficult, if not impossible. It was also slow in coming to its decisions as certain decisions required the unanimous consent of the entire Assembly. This problem mainly stemmed from the fact that the main members of the League of Nations were not willing to accept the possibility that their fate would be decided by other countries and had therefore, in effect, by enforcing unanimous voting given themselves the power of veto. Any member of the league assembly whose interest was concerned in the decisions out come also had the right to veto league action.[3]…

    • 3546 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics