Preview

Pros And Cons Of Pacifism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Pacifism
Even though there are several different types of pacifism, they all include the idea that war and violence are unjustifiable, and that differences should be settled in a peacefully. Some believe that pacifism is more than just an opposition to war. The argument is that it must include action to promote justice and also to promote human rights. The Pacifists beliefs are often thought of as totally against the killing of people; however they don't necessarily have to be. A pacifist can logically support the use of euthanasia and the practice of abortion; however they would need to have thought their position through very carefully. Pacifism beliefs requires one to withhold the use of force against others. It is thought that if practiced by everyone, the world would be a better place, making life easier to live. The just war theory is a largely Christian philosophy. The principles of a Just War can be originally linked to classical Greek and Roman philosophers such as Plato and Cicero and were added to by Christian theologians like Augustine and Thomas Aquinas(Nicholas 2000). The theory specifies conditions for judging if it is justifiable to go to war and the conditions for how the war should be fought. Just War Theory provides a useful framework for individuals and political groups to use for their discussions of possible wars. People are pacifists for different reasons such as practical belief that war is wasteful and ineffective, their religious faith. Within the Just War Theory people have to take into …show more content…
The contrast was dramatic a century ago, at the dawn of the bloody wars of the 20th century. As we move into the future, views may slowly shift in regards to pacifism and just war theories; however there will ultimately still be division among
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter 23 of History
    • 4184 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Chapter 23 of History

    Pacifists, interventionists, isolationists pacifists oppose war and violence. Interventionists are those who intervene with affairs of a foreign country. Isolationists are…

    • 4184 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Pacifist Constitution
    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Pacifist Constitution

    The end of the Second World War with the surrender of Japan marks the defeat of its short-lived imperial expansionist policy, and symbolize the establishment of the new constitution called” pacifist”, with the unnecessary help of the United States. The article 9, one of the most important articles under the framework of this new constitution, prohibited the use of the military forces as a mean of the settling the international disputes and the maintenance of war potential. However, this post-war pride pacifist constitution which has not been revised since it promulgation in 1946 has been recently harmed by the Japan Prime Minister and his ruling party whose plan was to shift it away. (Yaodong , L, 2014). Mr. Abe and his party is preparing…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Catcher in the Rye Vocabs
    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Catcher in the Rye Vocabs

    Pacifist: a person who opposes the use of war or violence to settle a dispute.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Definitions For Ethics GCSE

    Pacifism = The belief that it is wrong to use violence/war to settle disputes Prejudice = Forming an opinion before becoming aware of the relevant facts Racism = Poor treatment of / violence against people due to their race Reconciliation =…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Outline the concepts of just war and pacifism
    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Outline the concepts of just war and pacifism

    The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought. The theory that was first propounded by St Augustine of Hippo and St Ambrose of Milan ( 4th and 5th centuries AD) attempts to clarify two fundamental questions: ‘when is it right to fight?’ and ‘How should war be fought?’. Whereas Pacifists are people mainly Christians who reject the use of violence and the deliberate killing of civilians but claims that peace is intrinsically good and ought to be upheld either as a duty and that war can never be justifiable. However, Realists agree that, due to the nature of humans, force is a necessary action to be used to maintain a just and ordered society. Therefore, since the Second World War, people have turned their attention to Just War again establishing rules that can serve as guidelines to a just war- the Hague and Geneva conventions.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis Of Aldous Huxley's An Encyclopedia Of Pacifism
    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analysis Of Aldous Huxley's An Encyclopedia Of Pacifism

    Aldous Huxley provides strong and valid points in An Encyclopedia of Pacifism favoring the widespread use of pacifism. He actively responds to critics throughout his essay while also providing his own ideas and opinions about certain subjects. The main focuses of his argument is if war is a natural state and the justification of pacifism. While Huxley admits that pacifism is not a perfect policy, he also feels that it has not been implemented on a large enough scale to show its real effects. One thing is for certain though and that is war will not be the permanent solution to addressing indifferences.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Combat Tactics During World War I
    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Combat Tactics During World War I

    Historically, war has been the leading solution for solving conflicts globally. Though combat tactics have become increasingly more sophisticated over many centuries. The ability to affect and change the world through war stayed the same. All the while, the mentality of the public has become increasingly dissociative, and people have less interest on a large scare. From World War I until now, war has constantly evolved, and support has constantly fluctuated.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Just War Theory
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Just War Theory

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain Why There Will Always Be Wars Essay
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Why There Will Always Be Wars Essay

    Pacifism is a commitment to solve problems without the use of violence; in particular it is the belief that war is always wrong. Some people are pacifist because they believe that it is, in principle, wrong to use violence. Other people are pacifist because they believe the damage done by war will be worse than any good it does, and this applies to the Northern Ireland peace wall, that the damage and ill feelings it is causing is worse than the actual good coming out of it. If people in Northern Ireland understood that then things would change. Many of Jesus’ teachings honour this behaviour. For example “When Jesus was arrested he would not let his disciples use violence to prevent his arrest” so therefore Christians who try to follow Jesus’ examples might try to say that because Jesus would not allow people to use violence to defend him, then violence is wrong, no matter what the case, and that peaceful methods should always be…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Things We Carry
    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Things We Carry

    It’s what compels you to either flee from danger or address it head on. We often reward and cherish the instinct to fight while we shame those who follow the flight instinct. This illustrated in the the book “The Things We Carry” by … In the book he states that the primary motivation for fighting in the Vietnam War for many soldiers was, they would be embarrassed not to. They feared being called cowards by their contemporaries. This is profound because of what it says violence in America. Circumstances aside, many of the characters believe pacifism is weakness and something to be ashamed of. This severe and negative connotations seem inherently wrong. Pacifism is objectively beneficial. All major religions agree that pacifism is a virtue. This fear of non-violence is abnormal but strong in our society. During World War I, a man named Evan Thomas refused to fight because he thought it was immoral. He was court martialed and prosecuted. During his prosecution, a debate about cowardice verse pacifism arose. The prosecutor is quoted as saying “The very foundation of every civilized government from the first beginning of history down to the present time has been based absolutely upon force of arms… Gentlemen, if we don’t punish these cowards who appear in this land…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Things They Carried
    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Things They Carried

    There are many people who instead of staying in the middle, gravitate to either end of the spectrum. Some who fall on the far right believe that war is extremely necessary and disregard the negative aspects all together. Pacifists say that war understand the cons of war but fail to realize the good that can come from the…

    • 2057 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just War Essay
    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Just War Essay

    Many extreme pacifists reject the concept of just war and all justifications for violence. I actually disagree with the extreme pacifist that rejects the concept of just war and all justifications for violence. I feel that sometime war is something that just has to be done in order for people to solve curtain conflicts. St. Augustine is the known as the first one actually noted to be the founder of the theory of just war. A Just war is a theory that deals with the reason on why and how curtain wars are fought. The concept on a just war can be justified by concept of just war or the historical origin of just war reasoning. The just war aspect is about the ethical reasons on why they war is justified, and if that was last step that could have been…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is War Ethical
    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Is War Ethical

    The insurgents’ war is an unethical war. They use tactics of manipulation, deceit and media propaganda to brainwash vulnerable and desperate individuals into becoming suicide bombers. Analyzing these three tactics through events in The Sirens of Baghdad” by Yasmina Khadra with “Eros and Thanatos” by Chris Hedges and “Just War Theory” by Alexander Moseley and then comparing these events to real life stories such as “Abandoned in Iraq; We did our job as interpreters; why has the U.S reneged on its promise?” by Tariq and "Iraq 's Young Blood" by Christian Caryl provide insight.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    War Can Be Justified Analysis
    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages

    War Can Be Justified Analysis

    Living by this moral principle can cause a greater harm by turning the other cheek than by using force to deminish a greater threat. There is always going to be people seeking out power or people who have different beliefs and morals because it is engraved within ourselves through generation after generation. Jan Narveson directly states a pacifists view, "His belief is not only that violence is evil but also that it is morally wrong to use force to resist, punish, or prevent violence. We are aggressive and greedy people and to change the thinking of the entire world with out the threat of force seems nearly impossible. Hypathetically, if pacifism was put into law, the use of any type of force will be breaking the law and the sentence is life in prison. Now imagine if a man breaks into a house of a young lady and rapes this lady and then pulls a gun out to shoot her. If the woman grabs the gun and shoots the man, she would also be sent to prison for life because any use of force is labelled as unacceptable. In our society today, violence is happening everyday even though we have laws in place to minimize them. Violence is not only a thing of the past but it is a thing of the future and without a proper punishment, violence will increase drastically. Narveson communicates a second version of pacifism where " one might argue that pacifism is desirable as a tactic: that as a matter of fact, some good end, such as the reduction of violence itself , is to be achieved by 'turning the other cheek'. " This again is a good theory, but if it was put into action, the consequences would be great. A human has the right to defend themselves, or help a person that is in need. In war it is the same thing but instead of one person needing help, it is a population worth of needed help. A person claiming they are a pure hearted pacifist by " turning the other cheek" does not necessarily make it the best…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics