Preview

Pros And Cons Of Military Spending

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1038 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Military Spending
Position Paper: Should Military Spending be increased or decreased? The United States of America military spending is more than a third of the total global spending of the military in the world. It is estimated to be around $598 billion while the top 14 countries after the U.S., China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, U.K, India, France, Japan, Germany, South Korea, Iraq, Italy, Austria, Brazil, and Israel, combined, is estimated to be $664 billion. The rest of the world accounts for $317 billion combined (Taylor, Karklis). That was not the case back then in the U.S. The U.S. government used to spend very little on defense, which is estimated to be about one percent of GDP (gross domestic product). But, that changed dramatically after World War II when …show more content…
military spending is that it should be increased. The military spending is used in order to pay for training, health care and salaries of civilian and uniformed personnel; maintain arms, equipment and facilities; to fund operations, and to develop and buy new equipment. It is also used to fund all of the military branches in the country, like the Army, Air Force, Navy, Coast Guard and Marine Corps (13 Key Pros and Cons of Military Spending). Many of the expensive things the U.S. military does are crucial if the people are to live in a more peaceful world. The U.S. military’s first priority is to protect the country from foreign invasion. The military is also used to protect the United States allies around the world. One instance of the U.S. promising in defending their allies is with NATO. The U.S. pledged to defend every other NATO member state if they’re ever under attack (Salam). Recently, the United States have been facing threats from ISIS, Russia, and China (Chen). The U.S. has also been facing threats from smaller rogue nations like Iraq, North Korea, Libya, Cuba, Syria, and Sudan (13 Key Pros and Cons of Military Spending). The United States have to defend itself from these threats and in order to do that, the U.S. would have to spend more money on the military in order protect the country and the American people (Chen). Military spending should be increased in order to restore order to the world. Restoring order is very expensive due to the fact that it can’t be done with machines or equipment. It has to done with actual people who are intelligent who are effective in negotiating with others and influence others. The U.S. military spending should be increased for the need of having well-trained men and women with the capability to handle dangerous environments and situations, and the tools that will help aid them. The United States’s technologies that help with the country’s military dominance in the past, have now been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    military spending is accountable for 54 percent of all federal discretionary spending, which is $598.5 billion dollars. The second largest federal discretionary spending is the government, which is only 6% of the spending with $72.9 billion dollars (2). To add on, discretionary spending represents less than one-third of the total federal budget (5). Obviously, with all this spending, the U.S. is at the top of Global Firepower (GFP) list with Russia on the second place (3). There is a total of 4,999 military bases around the world, including U.S. and the number of people working in each military base, that is a lot of money spent on military only (4). So to reduce some spending on defense, the government should reduce the number of military bases, which will result in less personal and less money spend. However, this is difficult to do because many people believe and has been the guarding country for other countries for decades now. Also, many people are employed under the defense department, so if the spending is cut the unemployment rate will…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, the United States had the highest amount of gross domestic product compared to other empires in the World War II. The taxations and debts led to a higher GDP, over 17%. When the United States had involved in the Second World War the government spending represented 30% of the GDP, while in 1944 it has risen to about 79%, which is over $1.6 trillion.36 Conclusion “The American Grand Strategy in World War II was simple, consistent, and effective.” The national vision, goal was set from the start, it implied the defeat of the enemy, with the liberation of Europe as a priority. In Europe, this meant a large strategic attack of German and the Axis powers, which meant a large scale war production, the establishment of the lines of communication while preparing the execution of the invasion.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military and national defense are public goods, meaning that it could suffer from free rider problem. Citizens of the United States of America will benefit from military, a component of national defense, even if they do not pay directly. However, the production of the service required an input in the form of budget, which is partitioned from the tax collected. In a certain sense, budget for each year can be considered scarce, thus reducing funding for EPA allows for increase budget for military. The benefit for the nation as a whole is the improvement of military power, thus ability for the nation to protect its citizens, interest and sovereignty. Compared to the initial status however, it is perhaps unneeded. US military spending is already ranked as the first in the world, thus the marginal benefit of allocating more funding to such area will result in vastly diminished return. Therefore, the benefit payout, while might be evident in shorter term, might be rather small.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the political world continues to focus on the machinations of congressional investigations about Russia (which won't have conclusions drawn for months, if not longer) and where health care goes from here, there's another, arguably more important story going on — ramped-up military engagement.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    shouldn’t be spending so much money on aircraft carriers. Instead, they should ask for cuts in Pentagon and Navy spending. In the article, “Should America Spend Millions on Super-Carriers” by Mark Weisbrot, he says how “The Pentagon has only created enemies when they say they are protecting the nation.” This implies that the Pentagon says that they are working for national security, yet they do things that do not seem to benefit us. For example, drone strikes in countries like Yemen are only killing innocent civilians, and the only impact this makes is that America gets another enemy. They have only created enemies so far, and giving them more money would worsen the problem. America should ask for more cuts in spending because that forces the Pentagon to fight less wars and cause less damage. America should try to be involved in less wars so that the American people don’t suffer as much. If America was to keep funding the Pentagon as much as they are now, then the Pentagon would only create more and more wars that would cause America to lose more people and money. Basically, America should strive to create and get involved in less wars, and the best way to do this is by cutting the amount of money the Pentagon…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    C200 Exam

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. In President Obama’s speech at West Point, he announced that 30,000 additional troops would be sent to Afghanistan. He made this decision because he said it was vital to the United States’ national interest. The vital national interest at risk in President Obama’s address is the security and safety of the American people as well as the “security of our allies and the common security of the world.” By involving the military and increasing the troop strength, President Obama can achieve the objectives of his strategy. His objectives are to keep the Taliban from becoming powerful, prevent them from government rule, improve Afghanistan security forces and government so they can manage their own country and prevent Al Qaeda from establishing refuge in other countries. If you follow the framework of several important U.S. documents, such as the National Defense Strategy (NDS) and Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) they will outline this same strategy. The National Defense Strategy states that it is the responsibility of the military to protect ourselves and our allies from attack. It states that the military should help protect and secure our vital interests abroad. U.S. security is linked with the security of the international community. The physical integrity of our country is protected by the military through multiple security controls. One of these security controls is through deployments of the armed forces. The Quadrennial Defense Review states the mission of the U.S. military is to protect the American people and advance our nation’s interests. The vital interests of the United States are intertwined with the integrity and resilience of allies abroad. Our vital interests are security, prosperity, broad respect for universal values and an international order that promotes cooperation among our allies. The President’s vision is to become more powerful domestically while bringing together all elements of national power. We need to help our neighbors…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Military Budget Cuts

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States military has a major presence worldwide. We have the most dominant force and by far are the most advanced. There are soldiers and troops in over 150 countries across six continents. That does not count for all of the soldiers based on naval ships that constantly travel the oceans going country to country. With all of the soldiers, military equipment, testing, and research and development, the military’s cost has been averaging over 500 billion dollars annually. There has been an ongoing debate on whether or not to cut the military’s budget. On August 2, 2011, The Budget Control Act was signed into law to try and decrease our national debt by 2 trillion. Starting on January 2, 2012, the military will cut spending by 54.7 billion for the next nine years. Gary Bass is the founder of OMB, and has a doctorate in psychology and education from Michigan University. Baker Spring has a master’s degree in national security from Georgetown University. He specializes in examining the threat of ballistic missiles.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nation is spending over $100 billion a year on an endless war when we should be focused on our own economic recovery. The President announced a “significant and sizable reduction” in July of 2011, and now it is time to bring them all home completely. A study has shown that every hour, taxpayers in the United States are paying $11.26 million for the total cost of both wars since 2001. By bringing the troops home, the national debt can begin the reduction process. The war overseas is causing the United States to go deeper and deeper into debt.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federal Budget is used for many different necessities in America. It`s used for medicare, social security and more. One portion of our federal budget goes towards our military. Americans should spend less tax money on foreign armies, and more towards defense against terrorism.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    RA Essay

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Robert J. Samuelson’s article, “The Dangerous Debate over Cutting Military Spending”, is precise and to the point. The article states a clear view of the inaccurate reasons the government is cutting military spending, and how he believes they are just excuses. The reasons that the government is cutting military spending, according to Samuelson, breaks down to four contributing factors. The four factors are cuts to the military are a simple way to lower the U.S’s budget shortfalls, the U.S. can’t sustain today’s military, the cutbacks won’t affect the U.S. because they pay more than everyone else, and the large cuts to the Pentagon won’t hinder military capabilities.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the U.S. has the greatest military spending world nation and it is the highest budget in federal spending, the information presented will discuss the issues of military spending. Understanding how economic growth is working in the United States will influence the opinion of the American society. Since almost 37 percent thinks that we should spend more on military (Newport), this research paper might convince those with such point of views to reconsider their opinions about…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the war the US continued their buildup of arms, and followed “Truman’s recommendation that the country use military force to ‘contain’ communist expansionism anywhere it seemed to be occurring.”(History.com) This led to the US spending four times as much on defense as the previous year.…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The amount of money that our government spent on the Cold War was astronomical. In our desperate effort to stay ahead of the game in our nuclear advancements, we spent an average of $35 billion dollars each year(Weinstein, Adam). This money came from taxes of our employed citizens then, and for many years to come. We all fought in this war effort, we all made sacrifices. Unfortunately,…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People think most or all most all government agencies are for the “Public good” but do they know everything that they do and know what they spend on their budget, or is there a secret agenda that some government departments try to hind to the world. Hopefully by the end I can show you at least one department and see if their really are there for the “Public good.”…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The thought of military grade weapons being given to the local police is madness” (Sgt. Rob Aponte quoted in Kachmar). GIving military grade weapons to local police is not something people think about daily. Most think if there is armored cars in their village would make their village safer, but is this really the case? According to the 1033 program, which was installed in 1997, more than 4.3 billion dollars of military gear has been given to local police across the nation senes 1997 (ingraham). In 2013 alone just about a billion dollars was given to local law enforcement agencies (ingraham).The Department of Defense is selling these weapons to local police, but they shouldn’t be selling military grade weapons to untrained police officers (Ingraham). Overall, selling military grade weapons to local police forces is dangerous, excessive, and unnecessary.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays