Preview

Ford-Class Aircraft Carriers Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
713 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ford-Class Aircraft Carriers Research Paper
Prevent America from Spending Money to Make Ford-Class Aircraft Carriers
America shouldn’t spend billions on Ford-Class aircraft carriers because America already has enough carriers, the carrier force is in danger of new weapons that could reduce the power of carriers, America should have less ambition so that there will be less wars and less lives lost, and because some members of Congress are even thinking about cutting Social Security and Medicare for the military. Building more carriers when they may be rendered useless or take money or lives from American citizens is an atrocious idea, and the American government shouldn’t do it. The idea of making more carriers is a wolf in sheep’s skin; though it may benefit the American people in certain
…show more content…
shouldn’t be spending so much money on aircraft carriers. Instead, they should ask for cuts in Pentagon and Navy spending. In the article, “Should America Spend Millions on Super-Carriers” by Mark Weisbrot, he says how “The Pentagon has only created enemies when they say they are protecting the nation.” This implies that the Pentagon says that they are working for national security, yet they do things that do not seem to benefit us. For example, drone strikes in countries like Yemen are only killing innocent civilians, and the only impact this makes is that America gets another enemy. They have only created enemies so far, and giving them more money would worsen the problem. America should ask for more cuts in spending because that forces the Pentagon to fight less wars and cause less damage. America should try to be involved in less wars so that the American people don’t suffer as much. If America was to keep funding the Pentagon as much as they are now, then the Pentagon would only create more and more wars that would cause America to lose more people and money. Basically, America should strive to create and get involved in less wars, and the best way to do this is by cutting the amount of money the Pentagon

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kong ships are not required to pay any tax on profits made overseas and are also…

    • 264 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result of the rising interest rates, military spending, and the government’s economic policy, people seriously began to question the way the government handled America’s funds. In George McGovern, “Where I Stand” Newspaper Interview on June 26, 1972, George shares his opinion about the government’s spending, as well as the best course of action moving foreward. “By no longer underwriting the appalling waste of money and manpower that has become such a bad habit in our military establishment; By rejecting the purchase of weapons which are designed to fight the last war better, with almost no relevance to today's threat.” This statement from George shared the view many felt in regards to Americas economic standpoint; stop spending billions…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military and national defense are public goods, meaning that it could suffer from free rider problem. Citizens of the United States of America will benefit from military, a component of national defense, even if they do not pay directly. However, the production of the service required an input in the form of budget, which is partitioned from the tax collected. In a certain sense, budget for each year can be considered scarce, thus reducing funding for EPA allows for increase budget for military. The benefit for the nation as a whole is the improvement of military power, thus ability for the nation to protect its citizens, interest and sovereignty. Compared to the initial status however, it is perhaps unneeded. US military spending is already ranked as the first in the world, thus the marginal benefit of allocating more funding to such area will result in vastly diminished return. Therefore, the benefit payout, while might be evident in shorter term, might be rather small.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    US Hornet Research Paper

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I know that utilizing current military technology will be what will save the United States. People often talk about an upcoming WWIII. This is something that we should consider. Instead of trying to negotiate peace, we should be preparing for war. Many people across the United States believe we should no longer go to war, and instead research other things. However, the military is what keeps the United States the way it is. Without it, we would have all been dead a very long time ago, possibly part of another country, and no longer a world superpower. Instead, we would be a bug under the boot of progress. The U.S.S Hornet stands as a permanent memorial not only to military power and stability, but also to military presence in our lives and what it does to our country. Military technology got us to where we are today, and it will keep us moving further than where we are…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pentagon’s New Map: It Explains why We’re Going to War and why We’ll Keep Going to War…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basis of defense policy in the United States is put into detail for the audience. The United States does not start fights or conflicts; in the contrary, we have sought to reduce war by seeking arms. This all goes into the special term deterrence—in other words, we maintain peace through our strengths; weakness only invites aggression. Though the strategy of deterrence has pretty much stayed the same over the years, the cost to maintain it has not. Reagan explains the different ways in which the cost has…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is true that under the Pentagon budget and size of the armed forces has over time gone down under the Obama administration. However, it could be argued that these cuts are due to the Republican –mandated spending limits while others are as a result of operations of winding up the long existed wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vietnam War Benefits

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before 1940, the military budget took up two percent of the GDP. After 1940, the highest the budget has sailed was 41 percent {now dropped to seven percent in recent years}. The point being that our military is always changing, evolving and learning. Incidentally, one of the US’s first learning points was Vietnam. Clueless as to there being three different groups all fighting in the same country, the military was at a loss. Vietcong troops killed an inordinate amount of US troops because they didn’t do their homework before rushing in the save the day. Nowadays, the US has the CIA {established in 1947} or the NSA {established in 1952} to collect data before going into a war or any military conflict. Due to this intelligence and the advancement…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another reason is Sachs’s brought up the problem of the U.S spending their money on the military. ‘U.S spends…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With out the threat of nuclear power we have, many counties would gladly be fithing us right now, even if we do have an outstanding navy and army. If they had nuclear weapons and we didn't they would have the upper hand. Which is why I find it important to keep updating and researching new nuclear weapon mehods, but I don't see why we need to spend $1 trillion on them like stated in the passage. "Proposed spending $1 trillion over the next 30 years updating America's nuclear arsena." Why are we wasting so much money on something we have enough on and not soemthing more important like paying back $18 trillion of…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore, send the homeless tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door.” Reference? America has long been the land of freedom and hope to the world, and the American military is what has kept her that way. People have forgotten how important and valuable the military is to the world that we live in. As part of the Budget Control Act of 2011, automatic sequestration calls for $1.2 trillion in lowered federal spending, with 50% coming from defense and 50% coming from non-defense budgets. If Congress cannot reach an agreement, these cuts will reduce the Department of Defense spending by about $55 billion dollars. On September 11, 2001, the United States faced a difficult time in which 3,000 lives were lost due to an attack upon the U.S. by terrorists who hijacked airplanes and crashed them into the Twin Towers in New York City, the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and the United States Pennsylvania! That day, 9/11, has become a day in which we remember the lives that were lost and the families who were affected by such a tragedy. We called on our military once again, and they were there to protect our country. I am against automatic sequestration towards the military and military programs for many reasons.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cold War

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The implications of NSC-68 for military spending by the United States and its allies. The NSC-68 stated that "budgetary considerations will need to be subordinated to the stark fact that our very independence as a nation may be at stake." This meant that no matter how much it cost to build up our military, it would be done in order to protect our nation. Also, the rebuilding of European economies and defenses in order to try and contain Russian expansion without armed conflict, lead to the help of European powers having to return the favor of having their economies rebuilt with helping the United States in the Cold War.…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of high military expenditure in America argue that using raw dollars is an unfair measure but instead, it should be per capita or as percentage of Gross Domestic Product. With the change in presidency from George Bush to Barack Obama in 2008, the United States had indicated that it would cut high-tech weapons that are unnecessary or wasteful and spend more on troops and reform contracting practices instead. Oppositions against this measure argue that cutting these weapons will result in job loss and weaken national security. The counterargument states that discontinuing weapons systems will cause job loss in the short term, but unnecessary weapons manufacturing should not be considered a jobs program.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    spends nearly $1 trillion on national security programs and agencies annually, more than any other nation in the world. Yet despite this enormous investment, there is not enough evidence to show the public that these programs are keeping Americans any safer – especially in the intelligence community.” (Michael German, The US Intelligence Community Is Bigger Than Ever, But Is It Worth the Cost?, DefenceOne.com) There are many examples that prove this argument. For instance, the USS Cole, Indian nuclear bomb, and 9/11 terrorism attacks. All these occurrences have been crucial to our national security. Yet we have not been able to get ahead of the conflict. This is a pure contradiction, why poor money in to something that doesn’t work and has proven to fail time and time…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our second contention is that spending cuts are unnecessarily detrimental to United States economy and livelihood. Should the government decide to reduce or cut funding from its budget, the first three thing to be cut would be funding for promotion of the arts, national security and public medical care. With less funding for arts,…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays