Preview

Pros And Cons Of Harrison Bergeron

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
425 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Harrison Bergeron
Is Harrison Bergeron a hero or a danger to society?

He ripped the handicaps as if they were a celery stick. In a dystopian world where everyone was equal in every way possible, Harrison is stuck in jail for suspicion of overthrowing the government and is the most handicapped person in society for all his natural skills. In the scene where Harrison was on the stage and he tore his straps for his handicaps apart. With this strength, he is a danger to society and his skill from escaping the most secure state prison. He even had influence over people like the ballerina that stood up and danced with him. When someone has influence over other people, they can control people and they can be a threat to society. Harrison Bergeron is a danger to society.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Michael Huck who is on a wheelchair was denied from Odeon theatre that he cannot sit where he wants to sit due to the fact that he is on a wheelchair. He was discriminated by the movie theatres because the only place he can watch the movie is in the first row sits and he was also too close to the screen which interfered with his view and his enjoyment. Michael Huck has taken Canadian Odeon Theatres to Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is easier to understand the plot line of the story much easier what with the flashbacks and such, and being able to see Harrison’s face. There were also some new changes to the plot and some added story, such as the “bomb” that Harrison used to intimidate the people in the theater with, which in fact was actually a device that prevented the broadcast being shut off, the whole S.W.A.T team arriving at the building with intentions of disarming the “bomb”, and the Handicapper General, Diana Moon Glampers’ shotgun changing from a double barrel, ten-gauge to a semi-automatic. In conclusion, this could show that she was capable of killing multiple people if they did not put their handicaps back on, as she would think not having them on is an act of boycotting, which could lead to a rebellion and…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead of using the euphemistic word “disabled” or “handicapped,” she strictly chose the word “crippled.” She expressed that using other words, doesn’t clearly express her condition. She explains, “These words seem to be moving away from my condition, to be widening the gap between word and reality.” She doesn’t want to make the reader feel sympathy, instead she hopes they will view her as a strong woman. She feels as if “crippled” is the perfect word to describe how she feels. Mairs replaces the euphemistic words and phrases with much more brutal sounding phrases to show that she doesn’t feel pity for…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word choice used by any writer can portray or hide any of the author's points or secrets. Nancy Mairs uses repetitive diction in which she repeats words such as "handicapped", "disabled", and "crippled" in order to propel her self-definition across to the reader. Mairs uses a mediocre choice of language in her passage that allows her to be clear and precise as simply stated in line15, ""Cripple" seems to me a clean word,…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Berger vs. Appiah

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although John Berger and Anthony Appiah discuss very different topics in their essays Ways of Seeing and race, they are very similar in several ways. I found that the two have similar writing styles. Although Berger’s is a little bit more complex than Appiah’s, I found that they both write using extremely long sentences and difficult vocabulary. Aside from writing styles, I also found Berger and Appiah similar in their views. Both seem to go against the normal view of society. For example, in Berger’s essay he makes the argument that reproductions of art are a bad thing, whereas most of society views reproductions as a good thing because it allows the masses the opportunity to view works of art. In Appiah’s essay he makes the argument that race does not exist, which definitely goes against the common belief of most of society.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The stories I have read: "The Lottery", "Never" and "Harrison Bergeron" all can be similar by one certain theme. I believe that theme would be change. All of these stories' characters needed change in their lives. In "Never" the main character was hopeless and felt trapped and unhappy with her life. She needed to change this routine by seeing the world in a better light or leaving her past behind and catching the train mentioned in the text. In "Harrison Bergeron", the main character, Harrison fights for the right of being individual and change the law that is enforcing it. The traditions may be needed to change in "The Lottery" as innocent people were stoned to death for getting the wrong slip of paper.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The significance of Mairs calling herself a cripple is determined through her diction. She states how words like “underdeveloped” have molded to “developing” when comparing transformed countries to that of “disabled” people. She states, “Some realities do not obey the dictates of language.” Using words like “developing” to describe countries that are suffering aren’t portraying what’s really going on, just how words like “handicapped” don’t capture the truth and reality of a person who is “handicapped.” This is why she chooses…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated on page 1, handicaps have been made to take away so call advantages that some people have. As stated by the author, a Handicapper General was…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In short story “Harrison Bergeron” Kurt Vonnegut uses symbols and hyperbole to show how conformity isn’t better. Their society's solution to equality is to change the people who have unique attributes and make them the same as the average person. Vonnegut uses the handicaps to show how equality isn’t better and how their government fails to make everyone equal. They try to force individuals to change so they are conforming and no one will compete against each other. If you are above average you have a handicap, so it is obvious you are superior in some way. Vonnegut shows the characters are aware of this when George thinks “the ballerina… must have been extraordinarily beautiful, because the mask she wore was hideous”(Vonnegut, Kurt “Harrison…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Harrison was genius, he was not so modest. “I am the emperor!............’Even as I stand here crippled, hobbled and sickened- I am greater ruler than any man who ever lived”(pg. 3). Harrison was arrested and put into high security because of his high level of intelligence. As stated “Harrison Bergeron age 14, has escaped from…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many similarities between Kurt Vonnegut’s short story “Harrison Bergeron” and Chandler Tuttle’s short film adaptation “2081”. Obviously the same basic idea and theme are prevalent throughout both the stories. They are both set in the future where everyone is made equal by being forced to wear handicaps where they might show strength. Both of the stories involve the same characters in the same settings under mostly the same circumstances. The short film adaptation may vary a little bit in some of the details but for the most part both of the stories are exactly the same. In the beginning of “2081” the narration of the story is exactly the same as the beginning of Harrison Bergeron. Chandler Tuttle took it word for word straight from the short story.…

    • 570 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s 2081 in the United States and the Handicapper General is forcing people to wear handicaps that make them equal...but are they really equal? People in 2081 were given handicaps to make them equal. Except some people could do something, when others couldn’t, even with their handicaps. The people in the short story “Harrison Bergeron”, are NOT equal.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harrison Bergeron Quotes

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first piece of evidence is that he is rebelling against something big that spans he entire country, maybe even more. This could possibly start another civil war. The first caused more American death then another war, and they didn't have as much technology then. But "Harrison Bergeron" is set in the future, so more casualties could occur. If a lot of people took off their handicaps, and rebelled, there would be anarchy. The society would fall apart, thus Harrison being a danger to it.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The short stories "Examination Day" by Henry Seslar and "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut, both examine the idea of a world where governments have total control over its citizens. The main characters in the stories are Dickie Jordan and Harrison Bergeron. In "Examination Day" discrimination against intelligence is portrayed through Dickie who is eliminated because his "intelligence quotient [was] above the Government regulation." This quote depicts the governments authority in its society and how the government eradicated the people who questioned them through an intelligence exam. The irony of this examination is that success was seen as negative. Whereas, "Harrison Bergeron" explores the theme of forced equality in American society in the not so distant future. Right in the introduction, the three main issues concerned throughout the story are given, " Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution." Thus, absolute equality in intelligence, physical beauty, and athleticism have been ratified into law by the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, respectively. Both stories share a conflict in regards to person versus society and both the protagonists die at the end. In "Examination Day" Dickie is on his own when it comes to the test given by the government. Before the test when Dickie asks his father what the test is for, his father tells him"the Government wants to know how smart [Dickie] is." Later on, the story ends with an automated message from the government with the reason for his death and preferred funeral arrangements. In "Harrison Bergeron" Harrison knew better than to follow government regulations and tried to make a difference. In the end, he was killed as "Diana Moon Glampers, the Handicapper…

    • 697 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People have been participating in governing their countries either directly or indirectly since a sort of politics came into being. A small number of people can monopolize authority and abuse it for the sake of their own benefits unless masses of people take part in governing their countries. Therefore, their participation plays very crucial roles in their societies. By not taking their political actions, they can become passive. It can result in unfavorable societies. The Lottery and Harrison Bergeron stories criticize reckless obedience made by people in two societies described in very sensational manner. Purpose of this essay is to analyze how the stories describe passive societies in order to criticize a blind obedience by comparing and contrasting two stories. Both stories have more similarities than differences between the society structures and more differences than similarities among the characters for criticizing a blind obedience for authorized power.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays