Pros And Cons Of Habitat Conservation
HCP also known as Habitat Conservation Plan is a plan under the Endangered Species Act that aims to allow development from private sectors, landowners, and government, but at the same time also provide conservation to the environment. The plan is designed to protect habitat and to assist in species recovery on public and private property. Even though many claim that habitat conservation plan is effective in providing economic growth and conservation in urbanizing areas, there are still many conflicts surrounding private property rights. Some people are even saying that HCP is actually assisting in habitat destruction and that it is not beneficial to the environment at all. Also, there are mixed reviews within the public. Not everyone is positive nor negative about this plan.
HCP is used to manage conflicts from conservation and development by setting guidelines and rules for private investors to abide by. Private investors must follow the guidelines established by …show more content…
Applicant are to provide detailed information on the likely impacts resulting from the proposed take; measures the applicant will undertake to monitor, minimize, and mitigate such impacts; available funding to undertake such measures; procedures to deal with unforeseen circumstances; alternative actions the applicant considered that would not result in take, and the reasons why such alternatives are not being utilized. How applicants meet these conditions is largely left to them. Thus, the ESA guidelines is really saying that organizations or individuals can either choose to forego all use of certain natural resources, act illegally and risk enforcement, or prepare an HCP. So these are just some of the cons with HCP; they are not truly effective in checking with developments or are really strict with individuals or organization preparing for development and use of the
HCP is used to manage conflicts from conservation and development by setting guidelines and rules for private investors to abide by. Private investors must follow the guidelines established by …show more content…
Applicant are to provide detailed information on the likely impacts resulting from the proposed take; measures the applicant will undertake to monitor, minimize, and mitigate such impacts; available funding to undertake such measures; procedures to deal with unforeseen circumstances; alternative actions the applicant considered that would not result in take, and the reasons why such alternatives are not being utilized. How applicants meet these conditions is largely left to them. Thus, the ESA guidelines is really saying that organizations or individuals can either choose to forego all use of certain natural resources, act illegally and risk enforcement, or prepare an HCP. So these are just some of the cons with HCP; they are not truly effective in checking with developments or are really strict with individuals or organization preparing for development and use of the