Preview

Pros And Cons Of Being From The Animal Kingdom

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
696 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Being From The Animal Kingdom
People often refuse the idea of being from the animal kingdom to remove themselves from nature in order to justify their actions. Its believed that humans are not part of the animal kingdom because simply we have rational thinking and free will which animals don't have. Moreover, we have conscious that animals don't have, things that makes humans unique and characteristics that animals don't have or have different, according to science, things like Upright Posture, nakedness, hands, Brain size, clothing, fire, blushing, long childhood and mostly what really set us apart is our continuos and intelligence to evolve. These unique characteristics remove us from the animal kingdom. However this is not true. These characteristics make us unique and special but don't set us apart from the animal kingdom. …show more content…
There are abilities that animals have that we don't have such as infrared vision, the ability to fly and much more. But we don't exclude them form the animal kingdom because they have abilities that we or other animals don't have. According to science there are animals that have lesser levels of intelligence. Based on that, why should just one ability that some other animals do seem to have as well, be removed from the animal kingdom when we have everything else in common with them? Really, though, we consider ourselves different from animals the same way we consider family members different from strangers. We do have minds that let us decide what we want to be, and that is one of the things that does make us special from all animals but that doesn't make us divorced from our family, the animal kingdom. The most you can say is that us humans are currently the smartest living members of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of PETA

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    PETA stands for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. While they may say they fight for animal rights, many of their actions suggest far from it. Almost 97% of the animals that they liberate from facilities are euthanized. Most of the animals are killed within 24 hours of being brought to a PETA shelter. Why? Because most PETA members believe that an animal would rather be dead than be a pet.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremy Rifkin expresses his knowledge on how animals are compared to humans in his article “A change of heart about animals.” Rifkin argues that science has shown that the differences between animals and humans are less than we think. I agree that animals are very similar if not close to being on the same level as humans. Most people would assume that animals are very different from us; this could be due to the inabilities we think we have to communicate with animals.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Can animals really think? Can they make decisions based on information? For years, scientists have debated these questions. Now many of them believe that some animals have the brain power to understand new situations, make decisions, and plan ahead. many animals adapt their behavior to the challenges they face either under natural conditions or in laboratory experiments. For example, on other parts of Africa chimpanzees select suitable branches from which they break ofg twigs to produce a slender probe, which they carry some distance to poke it into a termite nest and eat the termites clinging to it as it is withdrawn. Apes have also learned to use artificial communication systems to ask for objects and activities they want and to answer simple…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin, behavioral scientist Stephen M. Sivy poses an important question all individuals should contemplate. “If you believe in evolution by natural selection, how can you believe that feelings suddenly appeared, out of the blue, with human beings?” The human race is not significantly different to the point where we must distinguish ourselves from alternative species. Many people seem to be under the impression that animals exist solely to serve our intentions, regardless of the detrimental effects they undergo. We as humans tend to classify ourselves to be at the top of the species hierarchy due to our moral compass and superior intellect.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just as we are defined as different by our physical and mental features, we are also…

    • 2469 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Life Of Pi Theme Analysis

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Humans and animals are two different things; however, they can be the same. We consider ourselves different from animals because we don’t walk on all fours, don’t eat off the ground, we have manners, we know the difference between right and wrong, and we have free will. Although, animals have the ability to do what they want when they want,…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general public as well as animals are put at a severe disadvantage as a result of the rules created by the politically elite. Those who are vulnerable in society: animals deemed useful and people who are economically disadvantaged, experience the most severe injustice, in part due to inadequate representation. There is no perceptible correlation between legislature, and mercy. The social justice movement is as strong as ever, and the discrepancy between laws passed and the need for basic human and animal rights has become more ubiquitous in modern culture. Bryan Stevenson’s Just Mercy, Una Chadhuri and Holly Hughes’s Animal Acts, and multiple articles that identify key issues pertaining to animal and human rights. As illustrated through…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, one of the reasons that humans should be in a separate category from non-human animals is that human beings are conscious and can choose courses of action (Alger and Alger). Human beings are capable of taking wise decisions by using their judgement. On the other hand, the other animals are not conscious and operate only on instinct (Alger and Alger).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world is filled with ideas and topics in which people get to decide if it’s right or wrong, but how do you which one is truly right? Facts and proven statements are what makes you decide on the one if more accurate then just having a person say what they think. On an article titled “A Change of Heart About Animals,” by Jeremy Rifkin has information on how animals, “are more like us than we ever imagined.” I disagree. I strongly believe humans are and will always be the dominant species and animals shouldn’t ever be on the same level with us, animals are inferior to us and humans will always use them for our needs.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Pojman, ethics include both theory and application. Yet non-human animals do not have the ability to comprehend such complex human theory, nor do they show evidence of applying such theories. Therefore, non-human animals should not be considered to be ethical beings equivalent to humans.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why should the rights that were fought for by our late independent heroes and civil right activists be extended to non-human animals that could not socially speak for themselves? Since animals do not have the capacity to personally fight for their rights, granting what humans had put in their blood for to enjoy to non-human animals will be a scenario of robbing Peter to pay Paul and hence an injustice to humans. Therefore animal rights movement is simply a misguided attempt to force people to grant animals the same qualities, needs and desires as human beings. While this movement is born out of kindness and sympathy, I think it is completely misguided because non-human animals are in actual sense, equal to human beings and hence do not deserve equal right as enjoyed by human…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although humans and animals have similar anatomies the two are completely different. Animals are not capable to think like humans and do the same things as humans like talking for example. Animals can’t communicate how would they be able to know what they can and can’t do in the society? Humans are given rights because they are somewhat responsible, but animals have no sense of responsibility because they have no duties in their…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What differentiates humans from animals is when it comes to mating some animals only mate to have offspring, which at this day and age for humans is not so true. Many people in America, have the ability to eat whatever, whenever; most animals do not eat just for fun or out of boredom, they eat to stay alive. If the animal is a pet it can be different because owners can feed them too much causing them to become…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Rights - 13

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    superior in status. Animals have been around on the earth for as long as humans,…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commonly argued points in opposition to animal rights include that it is the human ability to reason which sets us apart from other animals, that animals have no moral sense, that only creatures who comprehend rights can benefit from them, animals are not sentient: they cannot speak or feel and have no desires thoughts or interests, and animals and humans are inherently different, and therefore…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays