Preview

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
559 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
Animal testing is the scientific use of animals in research to find cures for diseases. The experiments may require killing the animal to find research. Those who agree with animal testing argue that it is useful since it allows scientists to find medicines and cures. On the other hand, others argue that animals are being mistreated in the process. I think animal testing should be banned since it is cruel, other alternatives can be used in place, the body systems of humans and animals differ, and is expensive.
Animals have brains, hearts, and breathe just like humans. However, human beings take advantage and use animals for experiments, which is cruel and unhuman. For this reason, people should respect animals since they have the right to live. The death of animals should be considered as euthanasia since researchers do it
…show more content…
The experiments are conducted on animals but for the benefit of people. However, animals’ body systems function differently from humans, making this experiments unrealistic. One of the most insupportable researches is the testing for cosmetics. Cosmetics are tested on animals’ bodies before they are approved for being applied on humans. During this, the animals shed their skin since they respond differently to cosmetics. Another example is the effect of tobacco on human lungs. Experiments were done to study the effects of tobacco on people. Smoke from cigarettes were used on the animals, showing that tobacco did not cause cancer. With this, the warning about tobacco as a cause of cancer was unknown for years, leading to many human deaths due to lack of information. Therefore, animal testing can be misleading because it can give wrong results during tests. A number of tests conducted on animals have proved successful for animals, but disastrous for humans. New technology should make it easy for scientists to create new ways of finding

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Peta website provides information and facts against animal testing. It contains practices that are done on innocent animals for research such as cosmetic, scientific, experimentation, and drug purposes. The animals that are used for unethical research consists of fish, mice, monkeys, dogs, birds and rabbits. The website describes the unethical procedures that they do on innocent animals. Animals are forced to breath in very toxic fumes and have their head drilled before they die. The innocent animals are treated inhumanely since they are treated as lab equipment rather than animals.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early on, the elimination of animal testing was unfeasible because it was the only available source. However, technology advancements in the late 20th and early 21st centuries have introduced alternative methods that are often cheaper and more relevant to humans. William Russell and Rex Burch first introduced the 3R’s of animal research in 1959. These R’s stand for the reduction, refinement, and replacement of the use of animals in research and testing. Many alternative methods that have come forward follow these ethics. More than 40 alternatives have been validated and approved world-wide with many more under way. There are a variety of cell-based skin tests, called EPISKIN, EpiDerm, and SkinEthic that can be used to assess the safety of drugs, chemicals, and cosmetics on humans. Organs-on-chips contain human cells grown in a system that mimics the structure and function of human organs. Researchers have also developed computer models that predict and show the ways drugs react to the human body. According to the former scientific executive of Huntingdon Life Sciences, animal tests and human tests agree 5-25 percent of the time, while cell culture toxicology, another alternative form of animal testing, agrees 80-85 percent of the time.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An issue that many people debate is if animal testing should remain legal or be banned. Did you know that Europe, which is the world’s biggest cosmetic producer, banned animal testing for cosmetics (11 Facts About Animal Testing)? Sure, animal testing has made some great medical breakthroughs like insulin. There are also downfalls to animal testing. One example is that the experimenters are torturing the animals and the test subjects are painfully tested on. These reasons show that animal testing should be banned, it harms animals, there are better options, and animals and humans are very different.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Satire

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal testing has always been a big issue around the world. Some people think that it is okay for animals to be tested on while others don’t. What even is animal testing? Animal testing is where scientists find new medications and test them on the animals before humans. Why might scientists test them on animals first? So, that if something goes wrong, only the animal would suffer and not a human. I am a critic for animal testing. I believe that animals have a purpose to the world just as much as humans do. Even if people don’t like rodents, that doesn’t mean we need to try and potentially kill them. Animals are very important to this world just like everyone else.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Cons

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (Alix Fano director of the Campaign for Responsible Transplantation and the author of Lethal Laws: Animal Testing, Human Health and Environmental Policy.) These findings conclude that Mice and Rats are not dependable subjects used for medical research. There are also alternatives for the unnecessary way of experimenting. Specifically, speaking of vitro testing. Vitro Testing is a way of conducting an experiment through a tube. This particular method for medical research has been beneficial to finding many cures for life threatening diseases. As a matter of fact, the cures today for AIDS disease were all discovered through vitro testing. According to the success of tube testing, animal experimentation is not essential to the medical research world. Not only does Vitro Testing open up a pathway of cures to diseases, it also save the many lives of innocent and loveable animals. Never again, will animal testing need to be a first priority in the name of science.(C. Ray Greek and Jean Swingle Greek are cofounders of Americans for Medical Advancement)To wrap up the importance of not justifying the use of animals for the world of medical research, previous experiments with Mice and Rats have failed to show a link between cancer and smoking. This failure was one of many occurring with use of animals as experimental subjects. (C. Ray Greek and Jean Swingle Greek are cofounders of Americans for Medical Advancement,) With great understanding of experimental failures, Alternatives, and the different doses of substances, animal testing the most unreliable and non essential method there is to medical…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Pros

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The major pro for animal testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine. Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more. It is for this reason that animal testing is considered vital for improving human health and it is also why the scientific community and many members of the public support its use. In fact, there are also individuals who are against animal testing for cosmetics but still support animal testing for medicine and the development of new drugs for disease.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Animal Testing Bad

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some may think that animal testing is something that can help with finding cures for bad diseases. But the truth is that animal testing is useless and harmful to animals. It is bad because so many animals get hurt during the process. Also animals get murdered and suffer after the testing even if it works. According to Animal Testing 101 100 million animals die each year from animal testing.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals testing is unethical because the pain and suffering that they are subjected to is not worth any possible benefits to humans. Scientists inject animals with irritating chemicals, genetically manipulate them to cause rare and painful genetic diseases, give them cancer and other diseases, and cause other injuries in the name of science. These animals are not given painkillers and are forced to endure prolonged agony before eventually dying…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another example of failed animal research drugs is, “The Thalidomide Tragedy”. a widely used drug in the late 1950s and early 1960s for the treatment of nausea in pregnant women. Within a few years of the widespread use of thalidomide in Europe, Australia, and Japan, approximately 10,000 children were born with phocomelia, leading to the ban of thalidomide in most countries in 1961 (Kim,Scialli). After having failed to come up with consistent data that the drug was safe to use on humans, scientists were only able to get similar results after the dose was between 25 to 300 times more on the animals than for humans. (Safer medicines). The reason the drug failed was because the scientists conducting the experiment failed to consider the physiological differences between humans and animals. Yes, animals and humans may share similar genes in certain parts of the body, but it's unrealistic to solely rely on a group of rabbits to determine whether a drug is safe and effective for a human baby. The two aren't even remotely comparable, which is why the Thalidomide tragedy is such a prime example of ignorance to acknowledge the fact that animals and humans are different, and therefore human drugs should not be created through unnecessary and ineffective…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing can be beneficial; however, the use of animals for testing is immoral and rarely even works. When being tested on, so many animals are treated cruelly and unlawfully. Also, a large percent of the time, animal testing is ineffective. Sometimes, animal testing can be humane, but sadly most research is cruel; which is why we should put animal testing to a stop.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An estimated 26 million animals are used for animal testing each year in just the United States alone. Animal testing is when animals are used to test products, medical treatments, etc. to see if they would be safe to use on humans. Doing this can cause the animal's death in some cases. Animal testing is wrong because animals are not true counterparts of humans, there are alternative methods to animal testing that cost less, and it is cruel and inhumane.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a very huge controversy and many people have an opinion on it. Some people wan animal testing to stop due to safety hazards and concerns for the animals, while others aren't so concerned about it, since testing it make it better for everyone. Animal testing used to be deemed necessary but not people can't be so sure. I personally believe that animal testing should continue and i will later state my reasons why. first, what exactly are the pros and cons of animal testing? Testing Animals has many good and bad reasons.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing has been the basis of all medicine and disease breakthroughs for over 50 years. Some people believe animal testing is a necessary and useful way to test and discover new products, but I believe it is not. Millions of animals are dying or being injured just so scientists can experiment to find new substances and products for humans to use, which does not justify for the many lives being lost.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought what goes into making your makeup, shampoo, medicine and even your toothpaste? At some point in their development these products may have been applied to the eyes and skin of live animals. Animal testing has been used as a mechanism in the advancement of cosmetics, medicine, and many everyday products (Moxley). Animal testing is a highly controversial topic that has divided people into groups that are against it or support animal testing (Klazema).…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays