Preview

Portrayal Of Caesar: Two Different Points Of View

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
213 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Portrayal Of Caesar: Two Different Points Of View
To begin with, the paintings portrayal of Caesar represents the two different points of view in regard to Caesar. One sees Caesar as someone that is pure and trustworthy and the other sees Caesar as ambitious and grasping. Shakespeare seems to portray Caesar as someone who is hungry for power. When offered the crown, Caesar refuses it. Each time he was offered the crown, it got harder for him to refuse it. In addition to, the painting shows Caesar as someone who was seen as victorious. On the other hand, the dialogue shows Caesars true yearn for power. Also in the painting Caesar is looked at as someone who is god-like; as someone who has an almighty power For example, there's a bunch of people under him holding sprigs; as to be praising
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Character Analysis: The Assassination Of Julius Caesar
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Character Analysis: The Assassination Of Julius Caesar

    To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Research Paper
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Research Paper

    The Republican period of Roman history began in 509 BCE after the last Etruscan kings was dropped. The Republic was controlled by the Senate, which was an assembly by dominated upper-class families. This dominance by the aristocracy led to tensions between the social classes, especially among the lower classes who fought for equality in both the economy and the government. Despite these inner struggles, Rome's military power strengthened throughout the 5th and 4th centuries BCE and by 270 BCE they commanded the entire peninsula. 264 BCE brought the beginning of the three Punic Wars fought against Carthage over control of the western Mediterranean. These resulted in victories for Rome which granted them access to the wealth of Greece, Egypt,…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis
    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis

    All texts are deliberately constructed to convey an agenda and a set of values. This means that every composer has a purpose, which is based on the issues arising from their context and audience. To that end, the composer uses conflicting perspectives as a vehicle for successfully conveying their purpose to the audience. So, through the representation of events, personalities and situations (which utilises form, language and structural devices), the responder is positioned to accept the perspective that the composer has represented as valid or credible. As a consequence, the composer is able to successfully impart their values to the audience. Examples of conflicting perspectives in society and the media come in the form of William Shakespeare’s…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis
    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives Analysis

    You are to produce a contribution to an online HSC Tutorial. You are to record and upload an answer to the question below. It is to be no longer than seven minutes and no less than five minutes.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tragic Heroes In Julius Caesar
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tragic Heroes In Julius Caesar

    There is a large amount of differences between the play interpretation of Julius Caesar and what really happened. For instance, Brutus in the play was extremely different than real life Brutus. In the play, he was best friends with Caesar-well, until he killed him. However, in real life, Brutus hated Caesar. He was never supportive of Caesar, and truthfully never loved him.(Musaj and Prezi Inc.) In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Brutus’s strong love of Rome, his honor, and his willing to do anything for the good of Rome to show that Brutus is the tragic hero.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tragic Flaws In Julius Caesar Research Paper
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tragic Flaws In Julius Caesar Research Paper

    In the play Julius Ceasar by William Shakespeare, Marcus Brutus is the tragic hero. Brutus is a tragic hero because he has Tragic Flaws. Brutus’s first tragic flaw is that he is naive; he is not a shrewd judge of people. As Caius Cassuis states, “Well, Brutus, thou art noble. Yet I see/thy honorable mental may be wrought /…There for it is meet / That noble minds keep ever with their likes / For who so firm that cannot be seduced?” (1.2.319-323). This shows how naïve Brutus is because he does not see that Cassuis is trying to manipulate him. Brutus’s second tragic flaw is that he has rigid ethics; he thinks he is unmovable. Brutus states himself that “[he is] armed so strong in honesty,…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives
    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives

    Every text is constructed for a purpose; the composer is trying to convey and embed their agenda into the reader by persuading them to accept their perspective on key events, personalities and/or situations. Through the manipulation of various textual forms, structures and language composers persuade their audience to adopt their perspective. Composers often decide to present conflicting perspectives to truly engage their audience. By demonstrating the concept of conflicting perspectives the composer is able to glorify their perspective in contrast to another to enforce their agenda, they position the audience through language to side with them. The tight narrative “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare’s utilises the final days of Caesar’s…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    julius caeser
    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    julius caeser

    With Caesar as constant and established he thinks very highly of himself which shows that he can control many things because he believes in himself. Not staying home like his wife wanted to, his seizures which make people believe he is a god, and taking the crown after three times of saying no show that he is great full and worthy to the people much like the north star because it is so constant.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives
    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Changing Sides Of Julius Caesar Research Paper
    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Changing Sides Of Julius Caesar Research Paper

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the common people played a critical role. They are not very dedicated to a certain side; they tend to switch depending on popularity or role. The common people tend to focus on the stronger person in power. They were for Pompey, but as soon as Julius Caesar defeated him in battle, they immediately switched sides and joined the followers of Julius Caesar. The people of Rome were never on one side for too long. They switched sides multiple times in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, which favored certain characters and disfavored others. The commoners play a critical part in Caesar’s reign and the conspirators’ plan to kill Caesar while being able…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Conflicting Perspectives Julius Caesar
    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Conflicting Perspectives Julius Caesar

    Personalities, events or situations often elicit conflicting perspectives. To what extent has textual form shaped your understanding of conflicting perspectives.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Tragic Hero Analysis
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Tragic Hero Analysis

    Within The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, it is argumentative that Julius Caesar appears to fit the definition of a tragic hero, however it is also believed by a large sum of individuals that Marcus Brutus is found to be a more fitting character to the definition of a tragic hero. Written by William Shakespeare, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is based upon a plot which revolves around the common theme of a tragedy, which can be perceived as a dramatic composition that often involves verses as well as a death of a high class individual, during the Elizabethan era.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar: A Tragic Hero
    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar: A Tragic Hero

    The story of Julius Caesar is a time period where Caesar was the noblest men of all of Rome. It's a famous time were there was a lot of tragic events. For example in act 3 scene 1 Cesar is stabbed and killed by the conspirators at the senate. The fall of their King was a tragic event. Also Brutus committing suicide who was also one of the noblest man of Rome. A tragedy is a powerful impact in a story. Which in ties in with a tragic hero who is the main protagonist {character} in the story but they will most likely will not achieve their ends they will most likely die in trying. Brutus in my opinion is a tragic hero in the story of Julius Caesar. Brutus is a character that we learn about who he really is. We learn what his motives is in the…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws
    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    In act two scene two, Caesar receives word that the priests, upon performing a sacrifice, cannot find the sacrificed beast's heart. Caesar does not interpret this the way he should, which is to stay in his house away from threats, but instead thinks that “the gods do this in shame of cowardice.” Shortly afterward, Caesar reveals that wife Calphurnia saw his statue, “which, like a fountain with a hundred spouts, did run pure blood.” Caesar, under the sway of Decius, again misinterprets this bad omen to mean that his “statue spouting blood in so many pipes, in which so many smiling Romans bathed, signifies that from you great Rome shall suck reviving blood.” As Caesar is full of pride, he is constantly looking for signs of his superiority, and when Decius gives this interpretation, Caesar laps it up without a second thought. Caesar, who thinks himself immune to flattery, can be so easily flattered by anything that pertains to his pride. However, these mistakes are not enough to damn him. In the end, Caesar makes a fatal mistake by directly insulting the gods with the words “Hence! Wilt thou lift up Olympus?” Caesar implies that he is equal to the Olympians, and they, to teach him a lesson, send the senators to stab him. By including this line, Shakespeare provides…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    English - conflicting perspectives
    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages

    English - conflicting perspectives

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics