Preview

Plato's The Republic: An Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
435 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plato's The Republic: An Analysis
In Book 1 from Plato’s The Republic, he evaluates the meaning of justice. In Book 8, he writes about four different kinds of government and how they all connect to one another. More specifically, he speaks of the negative effects of each political system and how those effects lead to the formation of the next system. Per Plato and Socrates, democracy emerges from oligarchy. An oligarchy is formed when the wealthy class are the leaders. When the desire for wealth reaches the point of some being wealthy and many more being impoverish, it gives reason for revolution. That revolution is what leads to democracy. Plato describes three classes within a democracy that also exist within the current United States democracy. The drones he describes would …show more content…
The way gerrymandering is achieved is by manipulating and redrawing congressional district lines in states. The purpose for doing this is for a political party to gain numerically favorable results at the polls and in turn get more seats for their party in Congress. There are several consequences to this. For one, the representatives don’t accurately reflect the choices of the voter population. Second, gerrymandering effects the election process. When candidates run for election, they go in knowing the districts they can and cannot win, because the districts are organized in favor of a political party. Furthermore, candidates are less likely to venture away from a party’s platform and suggest something that is more of a moderate view. This then leads to a strengthening of factions and gives rise to the idea that there is no point in voting, because that vote will not make a difference. Thirdly, gerrymandering affects the efficacy of Congress, but more specifically the efficacy of the House of Representatives. If in fact one political party is significantly more represented in the House, there is less chance of there being a compromise between the political parties. This again strengthens factions. Additionally, this ends up being a case of majority rules, even though that majority might have been fabricated. Gerrymandering undermines the United States system of democracy and further divides the nation when it occurs. However, gerrymandering is not the only thing that has this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering is a practice used when electoral districts are being set and are used to create a political advantage for specific group or party by manipulating district boundaries. For example, if one state was more likely to vote Republican you could have the area redrawn into an opposing district to win to allow better results for the opposing party.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Political gerrymandering is the drawing of electoral district lines in a manner that discriminates against a political party. When used to insure party success, political gerrymandering is usually legal but can be contested. At this time it is legal to draw district lines to protect incumbents of both parties.…

    • 51 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thus gerrymandering isn't unconstitutional. People can draw the districts however large or small that they want, there is no specification of what is lawful and what is not in the constitution There isn’t even a section or article in the entire constitution where it talks about redrawing districts. To be more specific there are no provisions (a condition or requirement in a legal document) outlined in the Constitution forbidding gerrymandering. Republicans held a majority in both houses of the state legislature, and a Republican was governor so of course they are going to draw districts into their favor; who wouldn’t? Furthermore there are little to no supreme court cases where gerrymandering was found unconstitutional. So if it is not unconstitutional or even in the constitution how can it be justiciable? The job of the supreme court is to uphold the constitution so if its constitutional it shouldn't be in the supreme…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main purpose of gerrymandering is to increase the number of legislative seats that can be won by the political party which is in charge of redrawing the district boundaries during that period of time, and to create “safe” seats for the party’s incumbent legislators which are seats in which the incumbent will always win re-election. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of election district boundaries to give an electoral advantage to a particular candidate or party. It has been recognized as a part of the American political landscape since 1812. The term derives from a redrawing of US Representative districts in Massachusetts before the 1812 elections, when Elbridge Gerry was governor. People said the district was reminiscent of a salamander and thus the term Gerry-mander was coined. The Constitution requires that representation in the House of Representatives be apportioned to states on the basis of population. So, every ten years we count up the number of people living in each state and making sure that each state gets at least one House member, divide up the rest of the seats among the states equally. States with large populations get a bigger amount of house seats smaller states get just the one. A variety of Supreme Court cases, however, have applied the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to the process of drawing legislative districts resulting in a requirement that each district have roughly the same population. So after each Census, states and localities have to redraw their district lines to ensure that the districts are roughly equal. This process redrawing of district lines has been blamed for almost every problem in American politics. The redistricting process therefore became a target for political reformers. In 2008, Californians enacted Prop. 11 and created the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC). State legislators would no longer be able to pick their own…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering- is the drawing of congressional districts to produce a particular electoral outcome without regard to the shape of the district.…

    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Buddha once vowed that “if a man can control his mind he can find the way to Enlightenment, and all wisdom and virtue will naturally come to him.” This quote correlates to Plato’s works written shortly after the Peloponnesian War (431 BC- -404 BC) between Athens and Sparta, arising from Sparta’s fear of Athens’s increasing power and knowledge. This relates to the Socratic dialogues The Gorgias and The Republic illustrating significance of temperance towards pursue of the good and explicates the deceitfulness of imitative poetry through Socrates. Polus, the adversary of The Gorgias’s second phase, maintains that to suffer injustice is worse than to commit injustice, something that Socrates later disproves. The third and final phase of The Gorgias,…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that Plato’s Allegory can be turned into an allegory of the presidential process. The candidates try to hold back any information that may damage their character in the eyes of the voters. For example, this year’s upcoming presidential election our presidential candidates have been caught withholding information from the public. I think that the presidential candidates are like the puppeteers from Plato’s Allegory and the American people are the prisoners that are shackled. The only truth that the prisoners know is what the puppeteer’s project before them. They are also similar to the puppeteers due to their control and divulgence of misinformation. The voters only know what is in their display, they have been exposed to it their…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each decade politicians become wound up for the political war of who will win the control of Congress for the next decade or possibly longer. One of the most effective ways of manipulating elections, shy of corruption, is gerrymandering. Gerrymandering (pronounced “garrey” mandering not “jerry” mandering) is the government’s advantage of one political party over another. It is the process of drawing weirdly shaped lines to define a district. The term is derived from Elbridge Gerry, who was one of the founding fathers, who drew a weirdly shaped district that resembles a salamander, it was henceforth dubbed gerrymandering. One of the unfortunate truths in American society and political life is that although we are told that each individual vote counts, the reality is that sometimes people’s votes are less equal. Political power in Congress is based upon population, the bigger the state is, for example California and Texas, the bigger the reward is of more seats in Congress, rather than Rhode Island or Delaware. The states with a higher population are appointed more seats and they get those seats from the states with fewer people that are counted from the census. The effervescent image of American democracy is that of a vibrant government that is open to change and subject to will of its voters, unfortunately this is an illusion. The problem with redrawing lines is that it eliminates the evaluation process that the public has by preventing competitive elections. I feel like it is just another loophole, oppressive scheme for political officials to try and dictate against us. Politicians seem to have the mutual feeling that it is a birth right for them to represent certain districts but we are still in a democracy, not a dictatorship or a monarchy, we have the right to elect who we feel represents our communities voice most appropriately and violating that right by eliminating the person we feel best suites us from our district it is violating our Constitutional and…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Although the term “Gerrymandering” originated in New England in the early nineteenth century, the practice of manipulating electoral regions can be seen as early as 1788.6 Patrick Henry, of the Anti-Federalist party, strategically created the borders of the Fifth Congressional District to ensure that the noted Federalist James Madison would be unable to gain a congressional seat.7 This original gerrymander, although unsuccessful in its attempt to prevent James Madison from becoming elected, set the stage for the method political incumbents would go on to…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I understand why you are torn when comes to gerrymandering, but for me I don’t think it’s fair. As the the definition of gerrymandering it is “redistricting to benefit a particular group”. What I really don’t like about it, is states get divided the way the congress wants and it changes at every . Even if the states gets redistricting in a weird way and it doesn’t make sense by looking at the map, as long as the district ends up with equal population. I don’t think the way it’s proportioned to make sure that one party has a greater chance of getting elected is right. It’s like if you live there and you end up in a population that you don’t belong in, you may have to move. I don’t think I should have to move, just to belong in the same party…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After voters elect government officials to office, they are assigned districts to represent by their respective state. Every ten years, a census of the United States population is taken, and the boundaries are redrawn so that every district has approximately the same population to ensure equal voter representation and is not controlled by a major political party. It is important to draw the lines so that every community in a district is given the chance to voice their concerns and opinions. It is also important to make sure that the lines are not manipulated by a political party to gain political advantage - this is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering gives control to a major political party and affects the issues that a government will look…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ passage is formulated by the knowledge that the soul consists of three parts that are predisposed by our own desires. He is fundamentally attempting to disprove the notion that the soul is one.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering has become a real issue in many states. “Gerrymandering is the process where the majority party draws an election district map with district boundary lines that give itself…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering allows for a particular party to get bills passed easily by having a majority of their party in The House of Representatives and Senate. With this increase they will have enough votes to make a bill veto proof. Political and racial gerrymandering are unconstitutional and illegal. As stated in, The voting rights act of 1965 “prohibits spreading minorities across districts”The court’s solution required that states create majority-minority districts — districts in which the majority of the voting-age population belonged to a single minority. With voting that occurred largely along racial lines, these districts allowed minority voters to elect their candidates of choice.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue many people have is not with the idea of redistricting, but how it is used by political parties to maintain or a gain an advantage in Congress, a process known as gerrymandering (Stern 2017 par. 1). The main purpose of gerrymandering is to maintain a delegate advantage, without having a majority advantage within the…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays