Preview

Case Study: Political Gerrymandering

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
51 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: Political Gerrymandering
Political Gerrymandering
Political gerrymandering is the drawing of electoral district lines in a manner that discriminates against a political party. When used to insure party success, political gerrymandering is usually legal but can be contested. At this time it is legal to draw district lines to protect incumbents of both parties.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gerrymandering Case Study
    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    Gerrymandering Case Study

    Before the 2010 census, Missouri had 9 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. After the census, Missouri lost a representative and now only has 8 representatives in the United States House of Representatives. This process of altering the number of representatives in a state after a census is known as reapportionment. As a result of this change in representation, Missouri also redrew its districts. The process of redrawing districts due to a census is known as redistricting. Unfortunately, this can lead to gerrymandering. Gerrymandering is the process of using redistricting for the purpose of obtaining a partisan or factional advantage.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: Gill Vs. Whitford Case
    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gerrymandering: Gill Vs. Whitford Case

    Gerrymandering is a practice used when electoral districts are being set and are used to create a political advantage for specific group or party by manipulating district boundaries. For example, if one state was more likely to vote Republican you could have the area redrawn into an opposing district to win to allow better results for the opposing party.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gill V. Whitford Case Study
    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gill V. Whitford Case Study

    Thus gerrymandering isn't unconstitutional. People can draw the districts however large or small that they want, there is no specification of what is lawful and what is not in the constitution There isn’t even a section or article in the entire constitution where it talks about redrawing districts. To be more specific there are no provisions (a condition or requirement in a legal document) outlined in the Constitution forbidding gerrymandering. Republicans held a majority in both houses of the state legislature, and a Republican was governor so of course they are going to draw districts into their favor; who wouldn’t? Furthermore there are little to no supreme court cases where gerrymandering was found unconstitutional. So if it is not unconstitutional or even in the constitution how can it be justiciable? The job of the supreme court is to uphold the constitution so if its constitutional it shouldn't be in the supreme…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: United States House of Representatives and Election District Boundaries
    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gerrymandering: United States House of Representatives and Election District Boundaries

    The main purpose of gerrymandering is to increase the number of legislative seats that can be won by the political party which is in charge of redrawing the district boundaries during that period of time, and to create “safe” seats for the party’s incumbent legislators which are seats in which the incumbent will always win re-election. Gerrymandering is the redrawing of election district boundaries to give an electoral advantage to a particular candidate or party. It has been recognized as a part of the American political landscape since 1812. The term derives from a redrawing of US Representative districts in Massachusetts before the 1812 elections, when Elbridge Gerry was governor. People said the district was reminiscent of a salamander and thus the term Gerry-mander was coined. The Constitution requires that representation in the House of Representatives be apportioned to states on the basis of population. So, every ten years we count up the number of people living in each state and making sure that each state gets at least one House member, divide up the rest of the seats among the states equally. States with large populations get a bigger amount of house seats smaller states get just the one. A variety of Supreme Court cases, however, have applied the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause to the process of drawing legislative districts resulting in a requirement that each district have roughly the same population. So after each Census, states and localities have to redraw their district lines to ensure that the districts are roughly equal. This process redrawing of district lines has been blamed for almost every problem in American politics. The redistricting process therefore became a target for political reformers. In 2008, Californians enacted Prop. 11 and created the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC). State legislators would no longer be able to pick their own…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Government 2302 Revision Notes
    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Government 2302 Revision Notes

    Gerrymandering- is the drawing of congressional districts to produce a particular electoral outcome without regard to the shape of the district.…

    • 4881 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Popular Vote In 2000: A Case Study
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Popular Vote In 2000: A Case Study

    Even though President Bush lost the popular vote in 2000, he was still able to win the election because he still had the majority. There are 538 total votes in the Electoral College and a presidential candidate must win a majority of the electoral votes to be elected, exactly 270. In 2000 there were a total of 538 electoral votes available with 270 needed to win the election between George Bush and Al Gore. Bush won 271 electoral votes by winning over more states that count for more electoral votes. Al Gore, won only 266 electoral votes and even though he won the popular vote, the states he won in did not count for enough electoral votes, therefore Bush…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission: Case Study
    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission: Case Study

    With the bitter wounds of British tyranny still stinging, the Founding Fathers thought up the first amendment. Democracy flourishes only when freedoms to express views, both political and those of other concerns, are guaranteed. What happens, however, when your own government seizes and destroys these rights, in its attempt to censor the public 's pursuit of political knowledge. The Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) court case brings forth this question and many more, as Citizens United, a nonprofit organization, was challenged in their attempt to broadcast "Hillary: the movie," by the FEC. The verdict, which was ruled in favor of Citizens United, deemed the film an act of the organization 'a first amendment right to free speech. Correct in their ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the abolition of restrictions…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    American Voters Initiatives Case Study
    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    American Voters Initiatives Case Study

    The easiest way to approach the question would be to be against it. Ballot initiatives known as a direct initiatives undermine the political process we have had in place since the beginning of our nation. American voters elect representatives to create laws that benefit society. If these representatives fail to do their jobs then they can be voted out of office during the next term. There should never be a time when a group of voters gets together and decides that since they can't get what they want they will pull an end-around on the legislative process by simply creating their own bills from scratch and submitting them to the public to be voted in as laws. The major problem stems from the fact that if given the chance voters will vote to…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering: Democracy and District Lines
    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gerrymandering: Democracy and District Lines

    Each decade politicians become wound up for the political war of who will win the control of Congress for the next decade or possibly longer. One of the most effective ways of manipulating elections, shy of corruption, is gerrymandering. Gerrymandering (pronounced “garrey” mandering not “jerry” mandering) is the government’s advantage of one political party over another. It is the process of drawing weirdly shaped lines to define a district. The term is derived from Elbridge Gerry, who was one of the founding fathers, who drew a weirdly shaped district that resembles a salamander, it was henceforth dubbed gerrymandering. One of the unfortunate truths in American society and political life is that although we are told that each individual vote counts, the reality is that sometimes people’s votes are less equal. Political power in Congress is based upon population, the bigger the state is, for example California and Texas, the bigger the reward is of more seats in Congress, rather than Rhode Island or Delaware. The states with a higher population are appointed more seats and they get those seats from the states with fewer people that are counted from the census. The effervescent image of American democracy is that of a vibrant government that is open to change and subject to will of its voters, unfortunately this is an illusion. The problem with redrawing lines is that it eliminates the evaluation process that the public has by preventing competitive elections. I feel like it is just another loophole, oppressive scheme for political officials to try and dictate against us. Politicians seem to have the mutual feeling that it is a birth right for them to represent certain districts but we are still in a democracy, not a dictatorship or a monarchy, we have the right to elect who we feel represents our communities voice most appropriately and violating that right by eliminating the person we feel best suites us from our district it is violating our Constitutional and…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gerrymandering: Is It's Fair Or Is It Fair?
    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gerrymandering: Is It's Fair Or Is It Fair?

    I understand why you are torn when comes to gerrymandering, but for me I don’t think it’s fair. As the the definition of gerrymandering it is “redistricting to benefit a particular group”. What I really don’t like about it, is states get divided the way the congress wants and it changes at every . Even if the states gets redistricting in a weird way and it doesn’t make sense by looking at the map, as long as the district ends up with equal population. I don’t think the way it’s proportioned to make sure that one party has a greater chance of getting elected is right. It’s like if you live there and you end up in a population that you don’t belong in, you may have to move. I don’t think I should have to move, just to belong in the same party…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Influence Of Gerrymandering On The Government
    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Influence Of Gerrymandering On The Government

    After voters elect government officials to office, they are assigned districts to represent by their respective state. Every ten years, a census of the United States population is taken, and the boundaries are redrawn so that every district has approximately the same population to ensure equal voter representation and is not controlled by a major political party. It is important to draw the lines so that every community in a district is given the chance to voice their concerns and opinions. It is also important to make sure that the lines are not manipulated by a political party to gain political advantage - this is called gerrymandering. Gerrymandering gives control to a major political party and affects the issues that a government will look…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Gerrymandering Research Paper
    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gerrymandering Research Paper

    Gerrymandering has become a real issue in many states. “Gerrymandering is the process where the majority party draws an election district map with district boundary lines that give itself…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College Case Study
    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Electoral College Case Study

    The way our country has elected the president is very unique compared to other countries so in order to understand it, Tanay and I broke down in pieces. In order, for a person to win the presidency they must, campaign in as many states as possible to the backing of their political party. This means that they have to win primary’s to even have a shot at winning the presidency. Once a person has the political backing, they continue to campaign and begin speaking at debates. In regards to the presidential, people vote in their state for president they would like to win. Since most voters were farmers, a two day voting window was needed. weekends were a problem because the majority of people attended church on Sunday. In addition to weekends, Wednesdays were bad because that was market day…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was There A Need To Draw Lines That Create Voting Districts?
    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Was There A Need To Draw Lines That Create Voting Districts?

    Gerrymandering allows for a particular party to get bills passed easily by having a majority of their party in The House of Representatives and Senate. With this increase they will have enough votes to make a bill veto proof. Political and racial gerrymandering are unconstitutional and illegal. As stated in, The voting rights act of 1965 “prohibits spreading minorities across districts”The court’s solution required that states create majority-minority districts — districts in which the majority of the voting-age population belonged to a single minority. With voting that occurred largely along racial lines, these districts allowed minority voters to elect their candidates of choice.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Black America
    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Essay On Black America

    While this concept is appreciated by many it isn’t liked by others. The process of carving out districts in order to benefit a certain party in voting is called gerrymandering which is a violation of voting law. Many people confuse this with the process of having majority minority districts. They are different because having majority black districts is for the good having equal representation in government which is a right. If majority minority black districts were not created blacks would have no real representation because they are usually spread across different districts and the numbers are not big enough for them to make changes using their votes because they are totally…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics