Preview

philosophy 3.2

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
473 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
philosophy 3.2
3.2
>>> 1.what is soft determinism?
>>> Soft determinism( compatibilism) is the doctrine that determined actions can nevertheless be free.
>>>
>>> 2. What is traditional compatibilism?
>>> Traditional compatibilism is the doctrine that free actions are caused by one's will and not externally constrained.
>>>
>>> 3. What is stace's explanation of how all our actions have causes ,yet some actions are free?
> His explanation is those acts that are directly cause by the internal psychological states of the agent are free. we can be held responsible only for the acts we perform freely.
>>>
>>> 4. What is Taylor's ingenious physiologist thought experiment?
>>> What is Taylor's drug addiction thought experiment?how do these two experiments undermine traditional compatibilism?
>>> Taylor's ingenious physiologist thought experiment is about a man who is hooked up to wires and controlled by various button, sort of like Frankenstein. Taylor's drug addiction thought experiment is about being addicted to drugs simply by being given the drugs over a course of time. These two experiments undermine traditional compatibilism because in the ingenious physiologist experiment both of the conditions of traditional compatibilism are met but the person being controlled actions aren't free because his desires are not his own. They come from the physiologist, not from himself.in Taylor's drug addiction experiment undermines traditional compatibilism because if your will is under your control your actions aren't free.
>>
>>> 5. What is frankfurt's decision inducer thought experiment? How does it attempt to undermine the traditional notion of responsibility?
>> Frankfurt's decision induce thought experiment describes a situation in which jones can't do otherwise because black won't let him.but if jones does what black wants him to do without blacks intervening, then jones is responsible for what he does even though he couldn't have done otherwise.
>>
>>> 6. What is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Lauren Slater’s article Rat Park, Slater talks about Bruce Alexander’s study and experiments on addiction. Alexander’s experiment consists of lab rats in two environments. The first is a caged environment and the second was a “perfect environment” called Rat Park. Rats in each environment were given two choices of water. One study group had regular water and the second was a form of heroin in water. The caged rats chose to drink the drugged water until they were placed into the “perfect” rat park environment. Once placed in this environment, theses rats stopped drinking the drugged water and started to drink the regular water. The rodents originally placed in the rat park drank the regular water and never chose to drink the water that was drugged with heroin. From this experiment Alexander came to the conclusion that addiction isn’t real and only comes about due to the environment you are in. Alexander’s hypothesis was controversial. Alexander believes that addiction does not exist at all from the data he has gotten back from his experiments. I believe addiction does exist and is introduced reinforced and heightened by three main factors. These factors are ones environment and social circle. The other is brain chemistry. And lastly there is the individual’s choice to continue with the addiction or seek help and end it.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite agreeing on the definition of free will and the factors affecting free will, D’Holbach and Hobart reach contrasting conclusions based on their interpretation of the self. Since free will is the possession of the self, how one portrays the self, affects the question of free will.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This experiment speaks to the 'nature of responsibility' and to see if the subject will stop the experiment…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    agent do what it pleased; the soft determinists simply ignore the question of whether the agent was in control of the sources that caused the actions. Holmstrom 's theory was that "just because some causes of desires and beliefs, such as brainwashing, make actions resulting from them unfree, it does not follow that any cause of desires and beliefs has the same implications for the freedom of actions resulting from…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PSY328 final proposal

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wrightsman, L. E., Kassin, S.M, Willis, C.E (Ed.). (1987). In the jury box: Controversies in…

    • 1936 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An individual is assumed to be capable to make their own decisions unless proven otherwise…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Referring to the two beliefs presented at the beginning of the excerpt, the piece supports the idea that the behavior of atoms is governed entirely by physical law and humans have free will do not have a congruent relationship. Atoms will do what they have to do because of physical law and its determination of what each atom will do in the given circumstances. This is fact which is presented clearly and holds accuracy. An interpretation of the example given would be is if an atom does Z in circumstance Q, then circumstance Q will result in the atom having to do Z. By physical law, one cannot predict, change, or control what atoms do and how they do what they do.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hard Determinism

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hard Determinism Defined and Defended In this paper I intend to thoroughly introduce, explain, and defend the theory of hard determinism. This theory as defended by Robert Blatchford will be presented and explained using two examples. Both libertarianism and soft determinism will be given a brief overview and will have their primary objections considered and rejected.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would lean more towards the compatibilist view stating, unless I am the cause of my actions I am not responsible for them. As compatibilist holds that free will and determinism are compatible, we can properly understand what it means for our actions to be free so we see that a free action is doing what one wants. Believing in compatibilism doesn't mean the determinist view is false, but if it is true, we can still have free will. I believe that we make decisions based on our own desires and beliefs. It is said that compatibilists attempt to revise and weaken the commonsense notion of free will. Thomas Hobbes was the first person to articulate a compatibilist position believing that although the person is free to act on their motive, the motive is determined. In other words, he says “Everything we choose to do is strictly determined by the need to relieve the physical pressures of our bodies. Humans…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question over the existence of free will has raged on over many years. Many feel that God, saw an omniscient being, must be aware of all that has happened and all that will happen. Supporters of the cosmological argument would suggest that everything has a cause and that god was the initial cause, “the unmoved mover” (Tomas Aquinus), this would support the idea that humanity has no free will as everything is pre determined. This highlights the idea that humanity is not free, and even when we think we have a choice our actions have already been determined.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stace's theory of compatibilism has to deal with free will and its consistency with determinism. Soft determinism is the thought that coherent humans should be held responsible for their actions if those actions were voluntary. Actions can be both free and determined while still having the ability to be held as morally responsible. Hard determinism on the other hand states that every action is caused therefore making a person unable to be held responsible for anything they may do.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soft Determinism Analysis

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Additionally, within the TD thought, there are two branches, hard and soft. Hard determinism, sees technology as developing independent from social concepts (politics, culture, economy) (Wyatt, 2008). Technology creates a set of powerful forces acting to regulate our social activity that we organize ourselves to meet the needs of technology and the outcome of this organization is beyond our control or we do not have the freedom to make a choice regarding the outcome (Smith, 1994). Soft determinism, is more passive in that it believes technology is not the sole driving force of past, present, and future society, but is the most significant (Wyatt, 2008). Soft determinists subscribe to the fact that we do have some opportunities to make decisions…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet, Chisholm deducts that it is a person or group of people whom are held responsible for the occurrence of an event and Chisholm states that this is often perceived incorrectly due to the lack of understanding in respect of causation (ibid.). Ultimately leading Chisholm to believe that it is possible for people to be the cause of events. Chisholm’s argument can be critiqued in the sense that; if an external factor influences a person’s decision then that person did not as a matter of fact have a decision and therefore did not exercise free will. However, it can be stated that all situations depend on the existing circumstances and as a result people or the agent making the decision are required to take other factors into account, such as; previous experiences which may influence a person’s verdict due to their knowledge on the topic at hand. This does not mean that the person does not have the free will to choose a different option but that they choose to make a certain decision based on their own…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Determinism Or Free Will?

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Free will refers to the idea that every individual is free to act in whichever way he/she chooses without being forced or controlled by any other aspects. According to the concept of free will, every individual is responsible for their actions unless they are children or insane. The determinism approach argues that there is a cause for everything that happens; nothing happens just by chance. Some philosophers claim that determinism exists outside the individual while others say that it is internal. This essay will address the free will-determinism problem, whether individuals have free will or not, and whether people can be held responsible for their actions.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram Experiment Essay

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In May, 1962 an experiment was done at Yale University. The experiment was called Milgram’s Obedience to Authority. The participants of the experiment was forty males. The male’s ages were between twenty and fifty years old. Along, with the age differences they all had different occupations.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays