Preview

Philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
448 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle
Philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle

The philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle had different points of-view but they were also similar in some ways. For example, all three philosophers had their own thoughts on the subject of justice and government.
Socrates belief on this matter was that democracy was an unwise form of government. He thought that the electing of the people was unfair justice.
Plato had some of the same beliefs. He believed that government should only have rulers who had the intelligence and education appropriate for the matter.
His thoughts were that a job should be done only by those who are best suited for it. To him aristocracy was a perfect form of government. The point of Socrate's philosophies were to make people think about the questions he would often ask. The reason for these questions being asked were to have people to their own thoughts and opinions toward life. He did not think a person with the right mind should follow the steps of their ancestors.
Instead of going around asking questions, Plato, another philosopher, would write his own conversations with imaginerary people. These conversations would cover much of the same topics that Socrates had tried to cover earlier. These topics mostly dealt with life such as government, opinions toward justice and how people really viewed education. Aristotle also had his own theories towards his belief of the "right government". He wanted his results to show happiness among the people. He'd mainly collect information from studying living creatures and observing their living habits. He would do this so that he could see what brought them happiness. His opinion toward life was that all people should live a fair and happy life. After many attempts of forming the perfect government , his facts allowed him to believe that a perfect government could be formed only by those who have a middle class. The middle class would consist of those who were not rich

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Did not advise people to permanently leave society to seek their own enlightenment. This means that a person should only take time to find this enlightenment and then return with spiritually, morally, and intellectually stronger and help others.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He said: “The future happiness or misery of a great proportion of the human race is at stake—and if we make a wrong choice, ourselves and our posterity must be wretched. Wrong choice! There can be but one choice consistent with the character of a people possessing the least degree of reason. And that is to separate—to separate from that people who from a total dissolution of virtue among them must be our enemies—an event which I de[v]outly pray may soon take place: and let it be as soon as may be.” (p. 130)…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Socrates: Should a man professionally engaged in physical training pay attention to the praise and blame and opinion of any man or to those of one man only namely a doctor or trainer”. The problem with this is that the opinion of the majority bears a different type of value than the opinion of a single specialized instructor. In his example it seems accurate to follow the advice of a doctor because the majority is generally uneducated on training. However, you can not trust the advice of just one person. This doctor may have a special agenda. He could be paid by another athlete to make the man training lose. Of course Socrate’s paradigm is just an illustration and is not meant to be examined too deeply but when we apply it to real life…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He thought that their worship of the word “we” was what made them so terrible. The fact that they weren’t even allowed to think for themselves, only as one whole could they accomplish anything. Nothing within the system was permitted to move on its own. And similarly to the idea presented in the essay, no one was able to morally judge anything or anyone. This was one of the biggest problems that Equality had with his old…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He argued that man was born naturally stable and desired good and needed to watch the government around them to guarantee that the government does not fail to protect those basic rights. He also argues that there shouldn’t be laws that affect only some people, like the rich versus the poor, but rather affect everyone.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Jenkins

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He embodied the counsel to “count others more significant” than ourselves, looking “not only to our own interests, but to the interests of others.”…

    • 836 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hellenistic Philosophies

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Hellenistic Period is said to have begun in 323 B.C. with the death of Alexander, it ended at around 30-31 B.C. with the conquest of the last Hellenistic kingdom by the Roman Empire. The division caused by the death of Alexander sparked the Hellenistic period; his Empire divided among his four generals: Cassander, Ptolemy, Antigonus, and Seleucus. Through the Hellenistic period, many advances came about in different fields such as engineering, mathematics, and medicine. New philosophies and religions emerged as well. There were various types of philosophies during the Hellenistic period, these include Cynicism, Stoicism, Epicureanism, and Skepticism.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His philosophy on human nature is that we are animals, ruled by great ego and emotions. Once impulse and…

    • 955 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading some more on Socrate, Plato, and Aristotle I found I wasn't a big fan of any one them. Their political ideas that people are too ignorant or selfish to govern themselves. All three felt that men should not be free in choosing and running their own government and they as philosophers knew better who should control them. Many of their ideas when it came to the freedom and abilities of others where more restrictive than what I thought. Aristotle’s idea that a person is a slave because their soul is lacking a rational part is justifying owning another human being and casting the blame of the situation on them instead of yourself.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question 2) In Book I of Republic, Thrasymachos’s states that unjust people are stronger and more powerful than just people. Thrasymachos believes that being just is not virtuous nor wise but that men act just only because they afraid of having injustices happening to them so they obey. Those who have power and control are those people who act unjust-they make laws and rules that benefit themselves, not the rest of the people. Socrates proves Thrasymachos otherwise by arguing that being just is virtuous, wise and profitable and being unjust does not make people stronger nor more powerful. Those in power or rulers make laws that are just for themselves but Thrasymachos agrees that sometimes rulers make mistakes and make laws that are unjust to them, therefore, making them just or advantageous for the people they rule. Therefore, unjust people would not be more powerful in this case. Additionally, Socrates goes on to reason with Thrasymachos that the individual in power commands advantages for his or her subject rather than their own personal advantage. Socrates makes a comparison to a doctor and a patient as well as a pilot and a sailor, where the doctor and pilot are commanding advantages for their subjects, the patient and sailor respectively. Thrasymachos argues that a just man will pay taxes on his estate and an unjust man will pay less taxes on the same size property, etc. Therefore, being unjust serves a greater purpose than being just. Socrates goes on to argue that no one chooses willingly to rule but they do so in exchange for wages because the ruler does not expect to make other gains in simply doing what is advantageous for the people being ruled. Work performed by people in power and in control is considered an art form that without being rewarded with wages solely serves that subject, or weaker person, receiving the benefit of the art. For example, a doctor practices the art of making others healthy. There are no advantages the doctor gains in…

    • 839 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    was all about money and making himself a living, he would rather help the rich over the…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    socrates

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    himself, yet in reality he was not. So I then tried to show him that he thought…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions on Socrates

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. What are the needs of the political community? What must all political communities do to insure their survival? What about Philosophy? What does philosophy seek? How does it go about this process?…

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, one of the many well-known philosophers in history, is Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC), who believed in more of a natural institution. Aristotle was heavily influenced by Plato, but disagreed with some aspects of his philosophy. However, Aristotle agreed with Plato’s theory, in which humans are political animals, but what sets humans different from animals, is that humans can reason. Hence, this forces people to live according to their reason rather than their passions. The downside of this ideology, is that the thoughts on a particular topic one would have, would be significantly different from other people, thus there reasoning on what is just and unjust can also be different. As a result, if a leader cannot distinguish the wrong in an unjust act, society would not be able to protect people from evil individuals, resulting in a dangerous society to live in. Moving on, Aristotle thought humans fall into one of three…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He said “the purpose of education, finally is to create in a person the ability to look at the world for himself…to decide for himself whether there is a God in heaven or not”. Here he is talking about teachers producing children who are capable of examining, questioning and thinking for themselves.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays