Preview

Philosopher Thomas Rousseau Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
414 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philosopher Thomas Rousseau Analysis
In the article that I read Philosopher Thomas Hobbes believed that people must surrender their freedom to a ruler. In the article, french philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau states that people should come together in societies and the solution was to form a social contract with general will or the common good.

In my opinion I agree with philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

I agree with him because he believed that humans are born with freedom, and this is true. I also agree with him because he stated that Government deserved to be obeyed only as it followed the common good in its actions.

I agree with him because he wants to bring back the freedom of the people on how humans lived before societies and government existed. He wants to bring back the freedom of humans in which people were really free and friendly. I agree with him because I also believe in what he believes that the only way that people can improve morally and mentally is to come together in societies, in a way that having an organized group of people can improve their morality and mentality. I agree with him because he is also saying that humans should not be enslaved by the government in a way that humans are born with freedom. I agree with …show more content…
Philosopher Thomas Hobbes has more likely to lead to an authoritarian government because he said that people must be willing to surender their freedom to a ruler. This means that citizens have no power. He also said that the ruler must have an absolute power, meaning he is trying to say that the leader can control his people. He stated that the ruler must have an absolute power, backed by force. For me that means that authority comes from fear so it is like his philosophy is more likely an authoritarian government. Knowing that the ruler has the absolute power I can say that the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes is more likely an authoritarian
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Innovative Ideas Of Democracy: Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Innovative Ideas Of Democracy: Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau

    He argued that man was born naturally stable and desired good and needed to watch the government around them to guarantee that the government does not fail to protect those basic rights. He also argues that there shouldn’t be laws that affect only some people, like the rich versus the poor, but rather affect everyone.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Singer's Views On Abortion
    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page

    Singer's Views On Abortion

    Do you agree with his argument? Yes, I agree we should accept the principles of impartiality, universalizability and equality fundamentally forward others.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ralph Vs. John Locke
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ralph Vs. John Locke

    I don’t agree because John Locke believes in government. John Locke doesn’t believe in state of nature. This connects with lord of the flies because the boys had a state of nature as a government. That’s why John locke doesn’t agree.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers
    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalist Papers

    “the one, by removing its causes; the other, by controlling its effects.” He thinks the first one is unwise and the second one is impractical. He is not in favor of removing the causes, because the cause is liberty. He does not wish to remove peoples’ liberty.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Augustine On Free Will Analysis
    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Augustine On Free Will Analysis

    He takes a very idealistic view on humans believing them to only corruptible due to other unjust people corrupting them. In truth I believe (unfortunately) that humans are more inclined to feel inordinate desires due to extenuating factors that catalyze their latent emotions that lead to the dire consequences that are engendered by inordinate…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Individual Rights and Freedoms
    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Individual Rights and Freedoms

    The source given discusses the prominence of the commonly debatable topic of individual rights and freedoms being neglected to fulfill the goals of the state. The source is clearly biased and against modern liberalism; in favor of a more collective society focusing more on the survival and prosperity of the state, rather than individual rights and freedoms. The source evidently identifies collectivism as well as authoritarianism as its most prominent ideological perspectives. If this source was a legitimate society in today’s world it would undoubtedly reject the natural rights of individuals as well as rule of law, egalitarianism along with the general will of the people. This can be most strongly supported by the following sentence stating, “The individual must serve the interests of a state.” The evidence taken from the source depicts a very strong presence of an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. This type of a society most commonly resembles the life in the medieval period, where everything and anything was used to benefit the state before benefitting its people, due to the divine right of the kings, which left no room for individual worth. The source states “Individual rights and freedoms are less important that the survival and prosperity of the state”, this is an excellent example of the thinking of the early English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Hobbes believed that people are motivated by selfishness and greed, to avoid disorder and turmoil; he thought people should give up their freedom to a government that will ensure order, which this government would be strong and able to suppress rebellion. The thinking of Thomas Hobbes and the source, both disagree with liberalism. Both Hobbes and the source given prefer the people of a society to peacefully hand in their rights, so that one single body of government can lead to the progressivism of the state through reform…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau Social Contract Essay Example
    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rousseau Social Contract Essay Example

    The social pact comes down to this; "Each one of us puts into the community his person and all his powers under the supreme direction of the general will; and as a body, we incorporate every member as an indivisible part of the whole (Rousseau: 61)". The general will can itself direct the forces of the state with the intention of the whole's primary goal - which is the common good. The general will does not allow private opinions to prevail. The union of the people, in its passive role is known as the State and is referred to as the Sovereign in its active state. Associates of the body politic are communally known as the people, and individually referred to as citizens or subjects. The primary problem to which the social contract holds the solution is based on the total alienation of each associate to the entire community. Rousseau proposes that every individual give himself absolutely and apply the same conditions for each and every one to result in an agreement where it is in no ones interest to make the conditions burdensome for others. The critiques of this contract are so specifically determined by ones actions, that the slightest amendment must make the agreement invalid; it is crucial to obtain a unanimous recognition and admittance by the whole. If the social pact is desecrated, every man regains his inborn rights to recover his natural freedom, and loses the civil freedom in which he bargained for. Stop. The existence of natural freedom is the argument in which I intend to pursue against Rousseau. This thought shall be revisited in a short while. Rousseau implies upon freedom the definition of the sovereign; it is a reason; a collaboration with others; a civil expression of the general will.…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    America: A Country Full of Incurious Know-Nothings
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    America: A Country Full of Incurious Know-Nothings

    Therefore, I would say that I agree with him because of so many reasons that I will explain throughout this essay. American ignorance has got to a point where citizens do not even have the knowledge to name the vice-president of the U.S. They are even unable to define the Bill of Rights. This is according to the results of America’s official citizenship test given to 1,000 U.S. citizens by Newsweek. The results were depressing and, of course, unexpected since there was a 6 percent that could not even circle Independence Day on a calendar which is very embarrassing for our country in general. These results are shocking coming from citizens of the world’s biggest superpower. And this is only one of the few things where we can see American ignorance reflected.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Hobbes and Locke
    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing Hobbes and Locke

    Social contract theorists Thomas Hobbes and John Locke agree that legitimate government comes only from the mutual consent of those governed. Although both were empiricists, the ways by which they came to their conclusions differed wildly, and perhaps as a result their views on the means by which society should be governed also conflicted. This paper will briefly address the different conclusions as well as the reasoning that led to them.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Rousseau and Hobbes
    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rousseau and Hobbes

    Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were philosophers of the mid 17th and mid 18th centuries respectively and proposed two political theories - in “Leviathan” (Hobbes, 1651), “The Second Discourse” (Rousseau, 1755) and the “Social Contract” (Rousseau, 1762) - that were very different but that once analysed, could be argued to have common characteristics and goals.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Major Differencies Between Eastern and Western Philosophies as the Basis for Adult Education
    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Major Differencies Between Eastern and Western Philosophies as the Basis for Adult Education

    "...defied the patriarchy in the name of individual freedom, who brought light into our darkness. He was the saviour who sacrificed himself for the sake of mankind, the benefactor who brought the gift of technology down from heaven, the teacher who taught us that we are not at the whims of the gods any more, who showed us how to use our intelligence to take control of the world".…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Book Thief Essay
    • 1489 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Book Thief Essay

    supports the statement of disobeying the rules when they affect people, as shown in his…

    • 1489 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    My Philosophy in Learning Economics
    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My Philosophy in Learning Economics

    “True individual; freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.”…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    “How Valid Are Rizal’s Political, Educational and Socio-Economic Reforms Today?”
    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “How Valid Are Rizal’s Political, Educational and Socio-Economic Reforms Today?”

    In politics, he believed the extension of human rights, the training for self-government and the arousing of spirit of discontent over oppression, brutality, inhumanity, sensitiveness and self-love. These reforms signify the rights of the people. Surely, these rights should be implemented not only in his time but for all seasons, be it now or in the future.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    up in the air term paper
    • 773 Words
    • 3 Pages

    up in the air term paper

    According to him, human society could never be perfected. He believed that man is a lazy animal, who would lead a satisfied life and procreate as long as his family was well fed. However, as soon as human population would feel constraints in food supply due to increase in population, he would again work hard to provide enough for his family. This might lead to an increase in agricultural production to provide for all, but at the same time man would be back to his complacent stage, where all his needs would be fulfilled. This would start the cycle of overpopulation and food shortage, all over again.…

    • 773 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More