Preview

Pharmaceutical Companies and Ethics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
919 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pharmaceutical Companies and Ethics
Pharmaceutical Companies and Ethics
It would be a mistake to claim that the pharmaceutical industry has not contributed to a better way of life and a better standard of living. They have come up with treatments for cancer-in some types of cancer they have even come up with the cure. It would also be naïve however to pretend that there are not some issues that have come up throughout the years that lead us to question whether the pharmaceutical industry’s main concern is the well being of the patients or their profits.
There are many instances in which we might ask if it would be possible for the pharmaceutical industry to play a little nicer with the public and also be away of the laws and ethics that surround the decisions they make. One good question that always comes up, is whether it is ethical for drug companies to give gifts to doctors as incentives for them to suggest their product over some other company’s product. This obviously leads to questions such as: Did my doctor prescribe this medicine to me because I really need it, because it will help me, or simply because it will make him money? I agree that doctors getting kick backs from drug companies are a serious dilemma. However, I feel that by concentrating on that, we lose the forest but for the trees.
Unfortunately for all of us, the pharmaceutical industry, just like any other business rely on profits to be able to survive. Therefore, supply and demand is what drives everything they do, along with their profit margins. It is not hard to believe that where drug companies are concerned, profits come before ethics. In the United States we have the FDA, which is more or less of an ethical compass for our drug companies. They are the ones to decide if a drug is in a stage that can be tested on humans; dropped altogether; ready to be marketed and sold to consumers. The existence of the FDA, however, has not stopped companies from trying to maximize their profits by misusing their products-all it has done



Cited: Coleman, Sarah. Nigeria Pfizer Scandal. April 2001. Article. 27 June 2013. .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit 1 Homework

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think with the aspect of economics the company has done the right thing as far as design great drugs in the past, and often even took losses with the making and delivery of those drugs. When it comes to Vioxx, I tend to believe that they should have informed the public and the doctors prescribing and taking this drug with all their findings and notions before the hard evidence came about. I do believe that not telling the whole truth about their findings to the doctors and the pubic goes against my belief in ethics. If I had anything to do with the distribution of the drug before the 2004 removal from market, I would have really studied the reports and warnings, and if I saw what was being reported and said from the scientist, then I would have stopped the sale of it then, and not wait until 2004. I would then have made a public address and told the public and doctors why we are stopping the sale and production of this drug. This would have again put more faith into the company from the public view as well. This is a hard question because if we look at the tobacco companies, they are still selling tobacco that has been proven over and over again to be harmful to humans and animals. I am a smoker and hopefully one day will quit, but for a company to continue to produce and sell a known harmful and deadly product, this is ethically bad for them as well as our government to even allow it. Where is the ethics in all of this? I will never figure that one out.…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Res 351 week 2

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pharmaceutical drug companies have a tendency to focus more on the sales and revenue than the research of any given product. This trend leads to misrepresentation of crucial scientific research on products. “A wide variety of research practices has been described as being used to distort the medical literature in favor of a clinical trial sponsor’s pharmaceutical intervention,” (Ross, Gross, & Krumholz, 2012, para. ).But also, not only do the drug companies practice unethical research studies, they spend money pushing products and incentives to physicians for writing the prescriptions for those drugs. That monetary value of those incentives is, often, more than the research on the drug itself. Two companies have been accused, tried, and charged for smudging results and falsifying findings for their benefit. It appears that pharmaceutical companies have interchanged the quest of treating and healing sickness and disease with the sole purpose of making money.…

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This year, about 580,350 US residents are expected to die of cancer – that’s nearly 1,600 people a day. Cancer is the second most common cause of death in the United States, exceeded only by heart disease. Cancer accounts for nearly 1 out of every 4 deaths in the United States. Drug prices are becoming a developing issue for every disease, especially for people who are uninsured. But the cost of cancer has shown an alarming increase and is steadily growing. As a list of more advanced biotech drugs become available the cost for treatment rounds costing $100,000, or even more, are no longer a rarity. With each new drug means more research which in turn means more money. Patients’ living longer is great news but also means they need treatment for longer periods which also increases cost. Prices reflect manufacturers’ years of research and development investment. Also, many drug companies donate a certain amount of medication to prescription-assistance programs that provide them for free to patients who otherwise couldn’t pay. This is a great program but is also extremely costly and directly contributes to the cost.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When considering the ethical issues related to PharmaCARE’s marketing and advertising, intellectual property and regulation of product safety of AD23 there are three issues. The issues elaborated below are (1) misleading/false advertising, (2) discrimination in distribution and most importantly (3) dangerous products.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This chapter focused on the different ways pharmaceutical prescription drugs are promoted by companies as well as how they are regulated by the government. In 2003 alone prescription drug sales were $228.8 billion. Prior to the 1980’ promotion of prescription pharmaceutical representatives targeted drugs toward healthcare practitioners in the form of supportive detail aids. However, consumers became increasingly involved in the decisions and discussions concerning their health. This marked the era of direct to consumer advertising of prescription drugs. This reason was due to consumers becoming more informative of prescription drugs, which was beneficial to promote to consumers. A total of $25.6 billion was spent in 2003 for the promotion of prescription drugs, of that $22.4 billion or 87.5% was spent on promotion to healthcare professional, and $3.2 billion or 12.5% was spent on direct to consumer advertising.…

    • 569 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    State Capitalism Model

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "The Ethics of Drug Patents." COMM 104 - Course Package Readings. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 Jan. 2014.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As companies are now held accountable, which adds new worries and creates a form of pain without pleasure—a violation of utilitarianism ethics. Similarly, according to act utilitarianism, which focuses on the pleasure brought about by an action when compared to another action that could have been performed (Nathanson). In this situation the physician has the choice of recommending a generic drug or giving a sample drug. If the physician chooses the sample medication the patient will be stuck with the ridiculous upcost of brand name drugs and a quality-lacking drug. However, if the physician chooses the generic drug the patient will have an affordable and safe plan proven by the years the generic drug has been on the market. Likewise, the example stated above is also in line with rule utilitarianism - the act of giving patients sample drugs is morally wrong because the same amount of pleasure is not produced due to the may hardships of sample drugs…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The current model of the pharmaceutical market creates a conflict between the competing interests of the patients and the pharmaceutical industry where the increasing market expansion and profitability of the industry is happening at the cost of patients’ ability to receive the most appropriate and effective treatment. The interests of the Pharmaceutical industry outcompeted the interests of patients and public health providers by the increased integration and resulting influence of the pharmaceutical industry in all aspects of healthcare and medical research. This increased influence of the pharmaceutical companies allowed them to expand rapidly through mainly two complementary processes: Disease-mongering and “pharmaceuticalisation”. Disease-mongering is described as efforts to enlarge the market of a treatment by either narrowing the definition of health so more people seek medical intervention or by broadening the definition of disease so milder symptoms and health conditions now require medical intervention. Pharmaceuticalisation is the increasing belief of individuals and healthcare providers that the best method of treating most ailments is only through a pharmaceutical solution. (Applbaum 84-102) These two processes have led to an environment where the prescription of a specific treatment does not depend on how effective it is but rather how well the manufacturer of the treatment has marketed their brand in comparison to other treatments. The total spending on pharmaceuticals across OECD countries is estimated to be more than 700 billion USD in 2009. (OECD 7.4) This incredible amount of revenue and wealth gives the pharmaceutical industry an equally vast amount of power and ability to influence.…

    • 4286 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Conclusion, companies that gouge the prices on life saving drugs are doing so unethically. They are abusing the law that allows them to create a patent on a drug and set the price to satisfy their wants. They do not take the…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conventional Therapy Cons

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Schools of medicine are immensely funded by pharmaceutical companies so this industry has a hugely vested interest in the marketing of their medicines. A company that is the top producer of prescription drugs offers scholarships and grants to medical schools so these two entities are connected at the hip.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pharmaceutical giant and British drug maker, GlaxoSmithKline, has agreed to plead guilty and pay the government three billion dollars in a health care fraud settlement bought by the FDA. This is the largest settlement involving a pharmaceutical company in recorded history. GSK have admitted to committing three fraud charges. They promoted the off-label use of two anti-depressant drugs – Paxil and Wellbutrin. The two anti-depressants are not necessarily considered as bad medicine instead the GSK failed to apply for approval from the FDA. GSK broke the law when they marketed the drug for a non-approved use under the FDA. The second charge that was made against GSK was when they held back data and made unsupported claims regarding its diabetes drug Avandia. The third charge that was made against GSK was when their sales team used inappropriate and illegal marketing tactics to get the doctors to prescribe their drugs. In addition to using illegal marketing tactics, they offered doctors free spa privileges, trips to Jamaica and Bermuda, and concert tickets. The three criminal charges involved Paxil, Wellbutrin and Avandia and included a criminal fine of $1 billion. The remaining $2 billion involves fines in connection with a civil settlement over the sales and marketing practices of the blockbuster asthma drug Advair and several other drugs (NY Times). GSK have not only violated the rules made by the FDA but also committed basic unethical behavior. Even though the $3 billion may seem like a large amount, it represent only a small portion of what Glaxo made on the drugs. According to IMS Health, Glaxo’s diabetes drug Avandia racked up to $10.4 billion in…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A serious concern has arisen from the news that prices for pharmaceutical drugs are becoming overpriced. The increase in prices has become too high and has caused countless people to not have the ability to buy the medicine they need. This is a problem. These expensive pharmaceutical drugs have taken over the market as well as bullying their competitors out of business. Due to the competition, demand, and patents, companies have dominated specific drugs. I believe these three effects are making companies that produce the drugs to stop thinking about their patients as a consequence of their own interests. This selfishness affects the public and I believe that there are solutions to help fix this problem so relief can come to the ones in need.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Research scientists at Merck discovered a cure for the disease river blindness, caused by a parasite and carried by the black fly, which adversely affects large populations in third world countries. After testing the drug through clinical trials to assure its' safety, the company tried to market the drug through sources such as The World Health Organization and several U.S. health agencies. The United States government was also called upon to introduce legislation to obtain funding for the distribution of Mectizan to impoverished countries. Merck's attempts to find buyers were unsuccessful. The management team decided to manufacture and…

    • 2739 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    FMB&T

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are two main points in this case. The first one is that AH Biotech will be the first to bring that particular drug to the market faster and cheaper. The second one is that the company considers the problem of offering people dramatic relief then snatches it away after getting approved. It is an ethical dilemma that the company faces.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The origin of the modern pharmaceutical industry can be traced to the late 19th century. There are five broad types of industry players: Ethical, Generic, Biotech, OTC, and Vaccine companies. Ethical drug is key sector with 80% of market share by value and 50% by volume. Key markets are USA, Japan, The EU, China, and Mexico. Companies with consistently high levels of R&D spending and productivity have become industry leaders. Pfizer (USA), GlaxoSmithKline (UK), Sanofi-Aventis (France), Novartis (Switzerland), Johnson & Johnson (USA) are leading global pharmaceutical companies.…

    • 3462 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays