Preview

Parmenides 'Views On Theaetetus'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Parmenides 'Views On Theaetetus'
Guiding Question:
How does Plato’s view of change and oneness differ from Parmenides’ view of non change and oneness, and how is that played out in the Theaetetus?
Parmenides views change as an illusion, saying that everything is one. Plato combats that by saying there is not a change in nature, but rather a temporal change, which is backed up by how Plato views knowledge, and how we come to an understanding of knowledge.
Plato, (1927). Theaetetus. The Dialogues of Plato (Benjamin Jowett, trans.). New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corp.
This source will be used as a commentary on The Theaetetus. It is both a collection of parts of the dialogue, along with explanations and thoughts on the dialogue.

Plato, (1989). Plato’s Theory of Knowledge.
…show more content…
Socrates tries to get Theaetetus to answer the question of what knowledge is, without himself answering the question. The first proposal is that knowledge is perception, which Socrates proceeds to discredit by saying one person can be cold and another hot. Socrates critique both Protagoras, and his relativistic thinking, and Heraclitus, and the idea that everything is always in flux. The second answer to the question of knowledge is that it is true judgment, which Socrates proceeds to disprove, going on to talk about true and false judgment, which is then followed by the definition that is true judgment with an account, which has the same problems as the second definition.

Outline 142-143- Introduction by Eucleides and Terpsion 143-149- Discussion on knowledge vs objects of knowledge 149-150- Disccusion on Socrates being a midwife 151D- knowledge is “perceiving the thing he knows” 151-159- Incorperation of Heraclitus’ theory of flux and Protagoras 160-183- criticism, defense of, and refutation of Protagoras and Heraclitus 183-187- refutation of idea of knowledge being perception 187- Theaetetus- knowledge is “true belief” 187-199- Can you have false judgment? 200-201- true belief by mistake is not knowledge 201- Theaetetus- “knowledge is true belief with an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Knowledge is generally thought to require justified true belief, even if justified true belief is not sufficient for knowledge, as Edmund Gettier famously argued. In the Meno, Plato demonstrates that true opinion is not equal to knowledge. However, Gettier holds a different opinion that justified opinion is not equal to knowledge, but it is necessary to knowledge. I support the Plato’s opinion that true opinion is not equal to knowledge, and that justified opinion is not necessary to having knowledge of something.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory of the Forms suggests that there are two worlds in which we live, one is through reality (world of Forms), whilst the other is accessed through our minds (world of Particulars). He highlights that there is only one of each Form while there are many copies of that Form, however, they all share common factors to the Form allowing them to be recognised and compared to. Plato describes the Forms to be perfect, eternal and un-changing whereas the Particulars are imperfect, finite and changing. This can be related to Plato’s conflicting ideas about education in his era, as he believes that the world of Particulars is based on opinion rather than knowledge and so does not approve of this world- the theory of the Forms and the Form of the Good allowed him to express these views showing how the Forms portray the creation of a better, conceptual world. Additionally, Plato describes the Forms to be intelligible, rational and non-corporal which means that his world of Forms cannot be accessed physically and so disproved. This therefore shows the Particulars to be material and corruptible which became a strong ground for us to relate to his theory as the imperfection and continuously changing world…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's understanding of knowledge is justified true belief. After rejecting 2 accounts of knowledge (knowledge as perception & knowledge as true belief) , defined as KNOWLEDGE IS SOMETHING SIMILAR TO JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF. (PG. 20)…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matrix 2

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |truth, and his theories of knowledge, discuss how contemporary |philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide |…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He also indicates that people who are located in the belief have beliefs but they barely have any knowledge of the things that they believe in. According to Socrates, people in the stage of thought starts to use their knowledge of reasoning. Lastly, people in the understanding level uses their knowledge to figure about the good. Therefore, in Republic, Socrates discuss about knowledge in regard to the hierarchy of cognitive faculties which describes the progress of knowledge in our souls.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unit 1 Psychology Notes

    • 3522 Words
    • 15 Pages

    9. Aristotle – believed the opposite of Socrates and Plato; Plato’s student, believed that we get knowledge through observing our world…

    • 3522 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Socrates To Meno

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In this essay I will be working with the concepts of knowledge and true belief. I will show how they differ in two different Plato texts. I will first work to show what the concepts are and how they are different. I will then work to provide the necessary background information for each text, and separately explain how these concepts are treated in the two different texts. Next after having explained the concepts use in the text I will highlight the differences in the two accounts. Finally I will work to show that while the two accounts do differ the differences can be reconciled, so Plato is really saying the same thing in both texts.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Title

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Use the matrix to analyze Plato and Aristotle’s theory of knowledge and apply both to current day practices.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Republic, Plato expresses that knowledge is something gained by a learning experience and also that you are required to rationalize and think-through the teachings you come across to truly apprehend something. On page 177 it is written, “… the virtue of reason seems to belong above all to something more divine, which never loses its power but is either useful and beneficial or useful and harmful, depending on the way it is turned.” (518e). Although it is known that knowledge is not easy to obtain, it truly depends on the “way that you are turned,” or rather the way that you are taught equaling the amount of knowledge you possess through a given amount of time. Opposed to that idea is the writing in the Meno, which is where we are told that knowledge is not quite something that is learned, but that it is innate in all of us.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato insisted change was made up of only two things: a pair of opposite properties and a subject. He argued that change occurs when the subject loses one of the opposing properties in the pair but gains the other in the process. For example, going back to the young versus old analogy, Plato would say that change occurs when a young man (the subject) loses his youth (a property) and gains age (the opposite property). Aristotle revised Plato's theory, and instead insisted that change requires the three aforementioned things: a subject, a form, and a lack of that form.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Plato. "Phaedo." Five Dialogues. Translated by Gube, G. Revised by Cooper, J. Hackett Publishing Co. Indianapolis, IN. 2002. 2nd Edition. 93-154.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    socrates

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    himself, yet in reality he was not. So I then tried to show him that he thought…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Plato, Crito, Trans. Benjamin Jowett. The Internet Classics Archive. Web Atomic. Web. 4 Feb. 2014…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘’- Confucius ,a Chinese philosopher (2016). John Locke, an empiricist, came up with ‘Tabula Rasa’. He compared a person’s mind to an empty slate. The reaction of senses is what attributes to the human mind, he said ("tabula rasa-philosophy", 2015,para 1). This stirs the question, if one is ignorant about the debauched, how can he differentiate it from the virtuous? Socrates too stood by the belief that "The unexplained life is not worth living". This was particularly relevant to Oedipus, a mythical Greek king of Thebes. Oedipus was ignorant about his birth status and rejected any truth that was said. Before finding out about this he lived in ignorance and was content. If Oedipus had continued living the way he did he would have lived an exultant life. But like a Socratic thinker, he ventured out to discover the reality because it was futile to be living in a world full of pretense. ("The Socratic quote in relation to "Oedipus the King"", 2016, para 3) Socrates ignorance was demonstrated when Socrates encountered with an eminent wise man. Nonetheless, Socrates deciphered that Socrates himself was the wiser one. Socrates did not claim to know what he didn’t know; hence he was the wiser one ("Socratic Ignorance", 2016,para 1). Plato too believed in a “conscious positive stand “, which meant that incredulity is originated on one’s comprehension of his own ignorance (Pigliucci, 2012,para 3) . Plato also…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays