Preview

Phaedo Examines Wether the Human Soul Is Immortal or Not

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
883 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phaedo Examines Wether the Human Soul Is Immortal or Not
The Phaedo is a story that is set on the last day of Socrates ' life. The dialogue examines whether the human soul is immortal or not. Socrates does not fear death, but he looks it straight in the eye and thinks this is what a philosopher practices for. Socrates believes that the soul is immortal, and therefore, outlasts the body. Socrates defends his argument by trying to establish that things come to be from their opposite. In his argument, he implies that all things that can change are eternal. I believe that Socrates ' argument makes some good points, but is not entirely convincing. Not all things that are subject to change are eternal I believe, which could bring about some questions to his argument. I believe that he is correct in thinking that the soul is immortal, but there might be some flaws in his argument. Socrates believes that the soul is more enduring than the body. One way he establishes this argument is on the basis all things that come to be and have an opposite "must necessarily come to be from their opposite and from nowhere else" (70e). For example, if someone becomes awake, then this person is asleep before he or she wakes. Socrates also uses the example of something that becomes smaller must have been larger in order to become smaller. Socrates says, "Then if something smaller comes to be, it will come from something larger before, which became smaller?" (71a). Then, Socrates takes into account that life and death are opposites. He uses the belief that dying is going from living to being dead. Therefore, being alive comes from being dead since they are opposites as well. If this is true, then one existed before birth. The body did not exist before birth, so the body does not only compromise a person. The soul does, too, and it is separate from the body. Since a person is comprised of the body and the soul, the soul apparently exists before birth. Also, since the body obviously dies at death, then the soul exists after


Cited: Plato. "Phaedo." Five Dialogues. Translated by Gube, G. Revised by Cooper, J. Hackett Publishing Co. Indianapolis, IN. 2002. 2nd Edition. 93-154.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One argument Socrates uses is that snow always brings cold, as fire always brings hot. Fire will not bring cold and snow will not bring hot. He uses these opposites to say that soul brings life with it; therefore the soul will never bring death, the opposite of life. Anything that doesn't fall to death is indestructible. The soul must be indestructible. I agree with Socrates that the soul lives on. It makes sense to me that the soul is indestructible with his reasoning behind it.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: In the section of immortal souls I learned that Socrates believe that the soul would never die. People saw him with craziness. They told him that how was it possible if it had not…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates’ passage is formulated by the knowledge that the soul consists of three parts that are predisposed by our own desires. He is fundamentally attempting to disprove the notion that the soul is one.…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato’s “Phaedo” is a dialogue between Socrates and his friends, Cebes and Simmias. These two men have asked Socrates to prove to them that the soul survives after death due to its immortality. Socrates gives them several arguments, which ultimately lead to his conclusion that proves the soul’s immortality and furthermore its perishability. Socrates proves that soul lives despite the body’s death by showing that if an entity has a certain characteristic, it will not accept the characteristic that is the opposite to its own. Socrates believes that the soul and the body are two entirely different things; the body is created to disappear after death and the soul is created to exist forever after death.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At one point during a philosophical debate between Socrates and Phaedo, Phaedo attempts to compares the human body to a lyre and the soul to the lyre’s harmony. Socrates, however, argues that this an inaccurate comparison. He explains that a harmony can be more and more fully harmonized or less and less fully harmonized, to which Phaedo confirms. Socrates then claims that a soul cannot be neither more nor less of a soul than another, a fact which Phaedo also confirms. Consequently, if the harmony of a lyre were to represent the human soul, then the harmony of all lyres must be the same, since no soul is greater nor lesser than another. Now, if virtue represents harmony and wickedness disharmony, then all souls must have the same amount of virtue…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates who was he? “Socrates was a Greek philosopher. Socrates was born c. 470/469 B.C., in Athens”. (Wiki) In Phaedo, I understand that Socrates he has arguments that demonstrate that the soul is immortal. “If we live on after bodily death, there is no reason to fear it.” (Phaedo) However, these ideas are attributed to Socrates in Phaedo. Of course we have no way of knowing if he feared death or not. He appeared not to fear death but who knows. You hear people say all the time, "I have no fear of death"--I've even thought that to myself-- but there's no way they or myself can know that until the last few minutes of life. I think that virtually everyone will fear death at…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summery Of Plato's Meno

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates uses the slave boy of Menon to illustrate his believe in recollection through the geometric experiment. This, he says, that all knowledge exists in the soul. That very notion makes the soul immortal. Socrates also states that things of human nature hang on the soul. And a wise soul guides rightly while a foolish soul does otherwise. With that a good soul is that which applies wisdom and not inherently good.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates prefaces his argument with by justifying the suggestion that philosophers, who live their lives rejecting their bodies, are in fact better off dead. Therefore philosophers…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates believed that the state of one's soul was of the utmost importance because one's place in the afterlife, whether it is into nothingness or some other place, and the next life is determined by the state of their soul. When a person dies, his body is left behind and his soul carries on, taking with it every part of soul, which is enriched by the mind through…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments For Phaedo

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the Phaedo, Socrates does not fear death because he believes that his soul is immortal and will be sent to heaven after his death. It is worth noticing here that he pre-assumes that the soul exists, so his central argument is not about whether the soul exists, but whether it is immortal. One of his arguments is that the soul is invincible, and invincible things can’t be destroyed, so the soul is immortal. I shall explain more fully this argument in the next paragraph. Then I shall offer my objection on his premise that invincible things can’t be destroyed, and thus how his argument of the immortality of the soul is invaid.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to understand this better, one must first understand why Socrates is not at all afraid of death. He believes that since…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phaedo

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates begins his explanation by stating that “all contraries come from their own contrary” (Phaedo 70E). He initiates his argument using examples of some fundamental contraries to make sure that Cebes and Simmias have a solid understanding of the main argument being proven. Socrates uses the contrary of bigger and littler, and states that it is a necessity that something must “become bigger later from something that was littler before” (Phaedo 70E). Socrates further illustrates his initial argument utilizing the thought process that the weaker must come from the stronger and the quicker from the slower. Once his peers begin to accept this notion that all contraries come from other contraries, Socrates moves the discussion to life and death and the idea that the soul lives on. Socrates informs his peers that the contrary to living is death. From there he further explains that the dead must come from the living and, therefore,…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Alcibiades continues with them talking about how the soul is separate from the body. There is nothing that has more authority than the soul within the body. Socrates then states that people who know their parts of the body know what belongs the them, but not themselves. This means that their body parts are for their bodies, but they body parts do not belong to the soul. Again. Socrates brings up that people who tend to their bodies tend to what belongs to them rather than what belongs to themselves. This helps Socrates bring up the point that the person who loves the body is someone who who loved something that belonged to the body, but Socrates is the one who loves Alcibiades’ soul and not his body. Love is loving another person’s soul as long as they are making progress. The person who loves Alcibiades soul will not leave him unlike the people who love the body. Socrates will love him unless he became corrupt and ugly. The body changes and the soul continues to grow. Socrates points out that he is…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Wisdom?

    • 1047 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think wisdom is learning through experience. Like when we love someone and realize he or she is not what we wanted, not what we exceptet we learn what we don't want, eventhough we still might not know what we want. I think all of our wisdom consists of things we know that are not good for ourselves. Wisdom is the truth we'd like to find in our lives. We're always looking for answers, and we seek the wisdom to find them. Eventhough I do not agree with Socrates saying that the soul is immortal I do agree on his point in which he says: „...the wisdom which we desire and upon which we profess to have set our hearts will be attainable only when we are dead, and not in our lifetime...“ I believe that only death and our mortality gives us hope that we might find the answers to all the questions we have during our lifetime. Such as why we are here and what makes this life worthwhile. Wisdom does not come to those who are ignorant and believe everything they say or hear. I believe wisdom comes through experiencing pain as well as joy, despite the fact that pain is of course not something we wish for just like death is, but still it is part of life and part of the ride so to say. I suppose Socrates would describe wisdom as something always renewing something that you constantly have to strive for. You can never gain wisdom as you can gain money for example, because wisdom is something eternal I would like to say, something you can never fully understand. I think that's why Socrates didn't accept it when the Oracle choose him as the wisest man, because he knew that it is impossible to choose a human being on being the wisest, since no such thing exist and Socrates knew it. And if I'm not mistaken on Socrates views, I would agree with him, wisdom has nothing to do…

    • 1047 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays