Preview

Outlinging Satirical Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
482 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Outlinging Satirical Argument
Outlining a Satirical Argument

First off, before we get any further into this argument and things are stated, I must make it very clear – I’m a 100% against trying to put any type of force against our right by the Constitution to bear arms. The biggest question I have that pertains to this subject is always “Do people seriously think gun control is going to make any type of positive affect on this country?”
I mean, seriously, think about it. No, I don’t mean think about it in a way that you actually think you have logically reasoning as to how it may work. Not matter how much you try to argue it, there is always going to be a better argument with the fact that the idea of gun control is absolutely ridiculous. Let’s just say that for one whole day, not a single criminal in the United States broke the law. Yes, if that happened, the crime rate would be at an all-time low and every person that wasn’t a criminal would be happy, right? Okay, let’s take a step back into reality. Making stricter background checks, making the laws a lot tougher to break, or just going around and getting every felon off the street – those are all perfectly fine solutions to the shootings, robberies, and murders.. If you could actually do it in the first place. That’s what I think the actual problem is, in all honesty. You want to fix the problem so bad you can taste it, but you aren’t thinking logically therefore the solutions you come up with are ridiculous. So, you want to make stricter background checks? Go for it; more power to you. But, how many felons do you know actually take the time out of their day to attempt a background check, knowing that they’re just going to fail it anyways? If they want a gun that bad, they will find other ways to obtain the firearm. Whether it’s through a private dealer, a family member, or just flat out stealing it from someone else, they’ll do what they want to do. Criminals don’t follow law. It’s illegal to murder people, use weapons for mass

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When we look at gun-related events, such as a school shooting, or a massacre, our first knee-jerk reaction is to immediately blame guns for the crime. Stricter laws will surely stop those law-breaking criminals, right? As if the time of the writing of the article from procon.org, 49 out of the 62 mass shootings were done with legal guns. At least, that's one less crime committed, right? Would leaving ourselves defenseless while criminals acquire guns illegally instead be a better method protection? My partner and I believe that stricter gun control laws should not be passed, due to the fact that the Constitution protects the right to own guns, criminals who commit crimes with guns would likely not mind breaking another law to acquire said gun,…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is quite clear that by looking at criminals intentions and the overall protection of our country's people gun control should not be administered. Since the establishment of our great nation guns have played a central role and have been of great importance. Though some may think that guns are weapons of war, crime, and violence our Founding Fathers realized they were an essential right that needed to be preserved for the citizens. In the Bill of Rights the Second Amendment of the Constitution reads "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." Gun control proponents have…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The role guns play in our society has long been a controversial topic for the past few years in the united states. There are those who believe that guns do not belong in the hands of citizens and there are those who believe that guns are the foundation that protects our rights and liberties stated in the Constitution. There are too many leading factors as to why there should not be any stricter gun control laws. Some of these factors are that they go against our fundamental rights of self defense, give too much power to the government, and could potentially increase crime rates in the united states.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right to bear arms is the the Second Amendment in the United States constitution. What says a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The right to bear arms has been around this country long then it's been a country. Putting more restrictions on guns just goes against what our founding fathers intend the nation to be like and infringes against the right to bear arms.The second amendment supports my claim which is anti-gun control laws and how putting restrictions on gun makes it…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Carrying a concealed handgun could help stop a public shooting spree.” The second amendment and open carry laws give law abiding citizens give those who apply the sense of security, protection, and safety to those who cannot protect themselves. Banning the right to bear arms and the right to openly carry would cause more harm than allowing legal citizens to legally carry firearms for self-defense. Banning guns can cause a major issue in many ways. For example, if you ban public carry of guns, what's gonna happen if a spree shooting takes place in front of you and your unarmed. You have just become a sitting duck. Taking away guns takes away a sense of security for about 11 million citizens trying to protect themselves and their families. “People are safer in states where law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry concealed weapons.” Most parents would do anything to keep their children safe, even give their life for the well-being of their kids. For example, the movie theater shooting in colorado. If a parent and their child were seeing a movie and the parent was armed, they could better their chances to get out alive if they are carrying then sitting and waiting for the police to disarm the criminal. Taking away or not allowing that right to be enacted is increasing the chances of harm more than making the streets safer without guns. “Banning weapons does not guarantee safety.” The saying goes, “A right unexercised, is a right that is lost”…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all more gun control laws would reduce gun deaths.Gun control laws don't deter crimes, gun ownership deters crime. In the twentieth-century weapon, ownership had doubled but the murder rate has decreased. Anyone can go buy a gun but that doesn't mean they're going to use…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    II. Gun Control simply wouldn’t be a good idea and is not the answer to this ongoing problem. Our right to bear arms should not be taken away. The only thing this would accomplish is taking away the right and protection for those who do make good choices. Criminals have and will find other ways to commit their crimes. So, I hope that the next time the gun control debate comes up; you will take a stand and be able to voice why gun control will not work.…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However taking weapons away from gun owners because of a few negligent owners wouldn’t solve any of the gun violence problems. I don’t believe in adding more gun laws and restrictions would help either but maybe more education for gun owners would help the few that maybe shouldn’t own weapons. I’m perfectly fine with the background check even though it’s a bit inconvenient at times if you have nothing to hide it shouldn’t be a problem.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    My first point is that gun control takes away many people's sense of security. According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), guns are used for self-defense 2.5 million times a year. The police cannot protect everyone all of the time. When a burglar breaks into your home, what would you use to protect yourself? 61% of men and 56% of women surveyed by Pew Research said that stricter gun laws would make it more difficult for people…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should Gun Laws Be Strict

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun control laws should be more strict in order to keep America safer, and prevent mass shootings. Recently, there was a mass shooting in Las Vegas, where at least 58 people were killed (Brander & Agiesta, 2017). Because of this recent event, and previous ones, people are beginning to consider having stricter laws on gun control. One reason why stricter gun laws would benefit the country is that there have been many shootings targeting innocent people. By having stricter gun laws, we could help stop these shootings. Although it is true that it is unconstitutional to ban guns altogether, it would be acceptable to make guns harder to obtain. Many people agree with this idea: “Almost half, 47%, said there would be fewer mass shootings if it were harder for people to legally obtain guns in the United…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Laws Are Bad

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Any society that will give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both ” (Benjamin Franklin). Gun control has been an issue for several years now due to the mass shootings and gun violence that has taken place. Many laws have been established to keep anymore shootings from happening, but these laws are starting to get out of hand. Adding and creating more gun control laws will not fix the problems with society today. Although some people could argue that gun control laws keep people safe, guns do not murder people, people murder people and no law could stop terrorist or criminals from causing mass shooting.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of gun control reform say, “The high rate of violent shootings in the United States can be traced to the country’s lax stance on gun legislation.” ("Gun Control Reform.") If there were bans on certain weapons a shooter will not have access to gun they want or have already used. “Since the current laws are too lax, it allows dangerous people to acquire deadly weapons with little or no hindrance. ("Update: Gun Control.") If the country had stricter laws against some guns or stricter background checks there could be a decrease in gun violence. Therefore putting restrictions on guns will save lives of American citizens and decrease…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    American Gun Rights

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The community who advocate really harsh gun legislation cannot get it past one of two places. These people struggle in the Senate were multiple proposed assault weapons bans have been shot down (Koenig 10). If gun control even struggles in the Supreme Court. In 2008 the Court choose to uphold the constitution and fight a District of Columbia gun ban (Spitzer 149). Not only do some of the gun control advocates want a total ban but the want the laws we already have to be harsher. Right now we have laws that work and make sense for law abiding citizens. The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibits the interstate transfer of firearms which does limit criminals access (Spitzer 99). Then on top of that, there is the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act which mandates background checks (Koenig 8). The background checks that are used are run through the NICS system, a system run by the FBI to make sure there are no criminal charges against your name (Koenig 8). These are just the federal restriction let alone all of the state responsibilities imposed on gun owners (Koenig…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem being crimes committed using fire arms. What the Government fails to recognize is that criminals do not abide by the laws, taking weapons away from law abiding citizen will only give the criminals more means to do harm. There is a law against braking and entering but criminals still do it. There is a Law against stealing, yet criminals still continue to steal. So what will taking guns away from Law abiding citizens do? Absolutely nothing other than make citizens more vulnerable to the criminals. While a study was found between 1980 and 2009, shows the States with restrictions on carrying concealed fire arms had higher gun-related murders(ProCon #2). This will also be the first and only Law that amplifies the problem rather than helping. If criminals want to have guns they will find a way to get them. Taking away legally owned guns does not get rid of the illegally owned guns. The Gun Control Law will give criminals the upper hand, they will be more likely to shoot innocent people to get why they want, expectably know there will not be bullet fired back at them. The reason Gun control has not affect on murders is because the killing is not being done people with legally owned…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays