Preview

Null Hypothesis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1012 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Null Hypothesis
Why We Don’t “Accept” the Null Hypothesis by Keith M. Bower, M.S. and James A. Colton, M.S.
Reprinted with permission from the American Society for Quality
When performing statistical hypothesis tests such as a one-sample t-test or the AndersonDarling test for normality, an investigator will either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis, based upon sampled data. Frequently, results in Six Sigma projects contain the verbiage “accept the null hypothesis,” which implies that the null hypothesis has been proven true. This article discusses why such a practice is incorrect, and why this issue is more than a matter of semantics.
Overview of Hypothesis Testing
In a statistical hypothesis test, two hypotheses are evaluated: the null (H0) and the alternative (H1). The null hypothesis is assumed true until proven otherwise. If the weight of evidence leads us to believe that the null hypothesis is highly unlikely (based upon probability theory), then we have a statistical basis upon which we may reject the null hypothesis.
A common misconception is that statistical hypothesis tests are designed to select the more likely of two hypotheses. Rather, a test will stay with the null hypothesis until enough evidence (data) appears to support the alternative.
The amount of evidence required to “prove” the alternative may be stated in terms of a confidence level (denoted X%). The confidence level is often specified before a test is conducted as part of a sample size calculation. We view the confidence level as equaling one minus the Type I error rate (α). A Type I error is committed when the null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected. An α value of 0.05 is typically used, corresponding to
95% confidence levels.
The p-value is used to determine if enough evidence exists to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. The p-value is the probability of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis.
The two possible conclusions, after assessing the



Bibliography: 1. Lenth, Russell V. “Some Practical Guidelines for Effective Sample Size Determination.” The American Statistician 55, no. 3 (2001): 187-193. 2. Tukey, John W. “Conclusions vs. Decisions.” Technometrics 2, no. 4 (1960): 423433.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stat 200 Exam 2

    • 5054 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Feedback: When a hypothesis test is statistically significant then we reject Ho the null hypothesis…

    • 5054 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If our sample result is very unlikely under the assumption of the null hypothesis, then the null hypothesis assumption is probably false. Thus, we reject the null hypothesis and infer the alternative hypothesis.”…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Math Extra Credit Essay

    • 751 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Statistical results published by journalists in the media and scientific journals can be immensely misleading. We can sometimes trusty these…

    • 751 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    o Note: I will give you SPSS charts to interpret. The actual SPSS procedures will not be tested. When you review the SPSS Guide, ignore the screenshots. You need to know where to get all the necessary information and how to interpret it and how to use it.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists could accept Clifford’s position because they rely on empirical evidence, experimentation, and observation to form hypotheses and…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Eskimo Snow Hoax

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the prominence of some claims, each hypothesis should be broadly tested by each researcher before taking them as an axiom. Unfortunately the large majority of writers, especially publicists and journalists still cite the factoid uncritically and may be willing to stretch the truth. It seems…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The hypothetico-deductive model or method is a proposed description of scientific method. According to it, scientific inquiry proceeds by formulating a hypothesis in a form that could conceivably be falsified by a test on observable data. A test that could and does run contrary to predictions of the hypothesis is taken as a falsification of the hypothesis. A test that could but does not run contrary to the hypothesis corroborates the theory. It is then proposed to compare the explanatory value of competing hypotheses by testing how stringently they are corroborated by their predictions. Additionally, as pointed out by Carl Hempel (1905–1997), this simple view of the scientific method is incomplete; a conjecture can also incorporate probabilities, e.g., the drug is effective about 70% of the time.[5] Tests, in this case, must be repeated to substantiate the conjecture (in particular, the probabilities). In this and other cases, we can quantify a probability for our confidence in the conjecture itself and then apply a Bayesian analysis, with each experimental result shifting the probability either up or down. Bayes' Theorem shows that the probability will never reach exactly 0 or 100% (no absolute certainty in either direction), but it can still get very close to either extreme. See also confirmation holism.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Family Therapy

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Give an alternative explanation of the results that makes sense to prove your side of things – Discussion…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sampling distribution of the test statistic is divided into two regions, a region of rejection (sometimes called the critical region) and a region of non-rejection. If the test statistic falls into the region of non-rejection, you do not reject the null hypothesis. The region of rejection consists of the values of the test statistic that are unlikely to occur if the null hypothesis is true. These values are much more likely to occur if the null hypothesis is false. Therefore, if a value of the test statistic falls into this rejection region, you reject the null hypothesis because that value is unlikely if the null hypothesis is true.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elements of a Test of Hypothesis 1. Null Hypothesis (H0 ) - A statement about the values of population parameters which we accept until proven false. 2. Alternative or Research Hypothesis (Ha )- A statement that contradicts the null hypothesis. It represents researcher’s claim about the population parameters. This will be accepted only when data provides sufficient evidence to establish its truth. 3. Test Statistic - A sample statistic (often a formula) that is used to decide whether to reject H0 . 4. Rejection Region- It consists of all values of the test statistic for which H0 is rejected. This rejection region is selected in such a way that the probability of rejecting true H0 is equal to α (a small number usually 0.05). The value of α is referred to as the level of significance of the test. 5. Assumptions - Statements about the population(s) being sampled. 6. Calculation of the test statistic and conclusion- Reject H0 if the calculated value of the test statistic falls in the rejection region. Otherwise, do not reject H0 . 7. P-value or significance probability is defined as proportion of samples that would be unfavourable to H0 (assuming H0 is true) if the observed sample is considered unfavourable to H0 . If the p-value is smaller than α, then reject H0 . Remark: 1. If you fix α = 0.05 for your test, then you are allowed to reject true null hypothesis 5% of the time in repeated application of your test rule. 2. If the p-value of a test is 0.20 (say) and you reject H0 then, under your test rule, at least 20% of the time you would reject true null hypothesis. 1. Large sample (n > 30) test for H0 : µ = µ0 (known). Z= x − µ0 ¯…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The process of forming and testing a hypothesis (i.e., a theory) is as follows: 1. Determine an appropriate expected outcome based on theory and experience. This is generally referred to in inferential statistics as a “research hypothesis.” 2. Formulate a pair of testable hypotheses related to the research hypothesis: a “null hypothesis” and an “alternative (research) hypothesis.” The testable hypotheses must be mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive. The hypothesis testing goal is to falsify or reject the statement of truth implied by the null hypothesis, leaving the research hypothesis as the only reasonable alternative. 3. Formulate a conclusion that falsifies (or fails to falsify) the null hypothesis.(Wolverton, 2009)…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hypothesis Testing

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    – Collect evidence/data – How probable is the belief/theory to be true in light of the evidence we have?…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This presumption may be rebutted by evidence to the contrary. This evidence may consist of:…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Patrick Mcneill (1990) once said “if a method of collecting evidence is reliable, it…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Behavioural Finance

    • 17676 Words
    • 71 Pages

    Rabin, M. (2002). Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers. The Quarterly Journal…

    • 17676 Words
    • 71 Pages
    Powerful Essays