Preview

New Nationalism Vs New Freedom Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1018 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
New Nationalism Vs New Freedom Analysis
The United States government has gone through many changes throughout the years since the first president. The presidential election of 1912 made a significant effect on how our country is ran in this day and age. Though they were bitter rivals from different parties, they infused the presidency with new powers and changed the nation in ways few other presidents have, before or since (Bowles, 2011). Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson debated a political state of affairs that still effects government and industry in our nation today. The issue at hand was trusts. On one hand, Theodore Roosevelt thought that trusts are inevitable. As he said in his 1910 "New Nationalism" speech, "There can be no effective control of corporation while …show more content…
However, they can be contrasted because their ideas about how to run the country are diverse. Both state that putting personal needs above the need of the nation is immoral. Another parallel point "New Nationalism" and "New Freedom" share is that both candidates show common conclusion that without large corporations, there would be a smaller break between the rich and the poor. Also, without this differentiation between the rich and poor, our nation would be enhanced as a whole. "New Nationalism" recognized that monopolies and trusts are tolerable as long as they are being of service to the people. "New Freedom" said that the nation should release all monopolies so that there would be less need for government interference. Wilson endorsed this because he believes that monopolies are shown to be protected by government and can fundamentally direct the administration because of all the money they bestow. In addition, in "New Nationalism", a deliberation on the responsibility of government in Big Business is that there should be more power. Roosevelt explained that with more legislative control, there could still be trusts but they would be strictly monitored. "New Freedom" had a conflicting view on the subject. Wilson leaned more on if the nation eliminated its trusts there wouldn’t be a need for more governmental pressure on big businesses because there would be no big …show more content…
(2011). American history 1865–present: End of isolation. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Chin, C. C.(2011). The Visible Hand of Woodrow Wilson. Reviews in American History 39(1), 149-155. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Retrieved September 3, 2013, from Project MUSE database.
Roosevelt, T. R. (1910, Aug. 31). The new nationalism. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/primary-resources/tr-nationalism/
United States. Pure Food and Drug Act (1906). United States Statutes at Large (59th Cong., Sess. I, Chp. 3915, p. 768-772; cited as 34 U.S. Stats. 768) In: History of Medicine Division. Medicine in the Americas: Historical Works [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US); 2004-. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22116/
Wilson, W. (1913). What is progress?. In The new freedom: A call for the emancipation of the generous energies of a people (Chapter II). New York: Doubleday, Page & Company. Retrieved from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In a time period of rapid progressive change, big businesses were blooming and many became corrupt. If it was not for Theodore Roosevelt’s strong role in reforming U.S. laws regulating business in the early 20th century, America would never have been what it is today. Roosevelt’s ability to play a strong role regulating business laws in the early 1900s proved to be effective because it created a foundation of how the economy should be run.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Running for President in 1912, both Roosevelt of the Progressive Party, and Wilson of the Democratic Party, were competing for the progressive vote. In appealing to progressives, Roosevelt promoted his New Nationalism- the use of the power of the federal government to regulate big business. Wilson countered with his New Freedom, which emphasized restoring fair competition and the free market through remedial legislation and limited federal government. Fireworks resulted when the two explained their positions on the campaign trail. Wilson called Roosevelt a "self-appointed divinity" who would make people puppets of the government, and declared that "the history of liberty is a history of limited governmental power, not the increase of it. Roosevelt fired back.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This, in effect, limits the options to detach power of the three branches of government such as judicial, legislative, and executive branches. As time progresses throughout the American history, new policies will continue to be implemented and immediately put into effect during the presidential era. Of course, neither candidate did not want to argue on issues about how the government led the people but how the government designed the powers that were put into laws to protect and serve the people of our country but, indeed, is beneficial to all citizens and our everyday lives. Their main focus was the aspects of how lawmaking should be administered and applied to all civilians equally. “President Woodrow Wilson stated four reasons why there should be a science of administration: (1) straighten the paths of government; (2) make its business businesslike; (3) strengthen its organization; and (4) crown its dutifulness” (Jison, 2014, para…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will be comparing and contrasting the Presidential Legacies of Abraham Lincoln and Woodrow Wilson. Both Lincoln and Wilson faced troubles in their presidency. Even though the men dealt with two different wars and issues, Lincoln and Wilson both had to make drastic decisions that affected all of the U.S.A.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The dawn of Imperial Presidency, also known as Roosevelt's "New Nationalism" became a role of executive power that would never diminish in the U.S. for a variety of economic and political reasons. To achieve the prominence and longevity of "New Nationalism," Roosevelt and his surrounding "Brain Trust" of lawyers and professors reasoned that "bigness was unavoidable" and that "competition in most of its forms is wasteful and costly" (759).…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roosevelt’s inaugural term decided to kick out the old American order of “the financial Titan” and the “do-nothing laissez faire” government. F.D.R. brought about the “New Deal,” for the protection of the “forgotten man.” F.D.R. stated that “democracy is actually a quest, a never ending seeking for better things.” This marked the new age of American “national democracy”, with the constitution and Bill of Rights, which differ from “Jeffersonian Individualism and states’ rights.” The article explains the New Deal changed the way of thinking in America. We shouldn’t be isolated and independent anymore, but come together as one democracy. This shunned out the idea of liberty and encouraged a more centralized administration that provides positive rights to “everyone,” in a more democratic value.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leuchtenburg’s, “The Achievement of the New Deal” focuses on the necessity to reinterpret the Roosevelt years and reflect on the New Deal and its accomplishments. One of his major points is how previous scholars had viewed the New Deal as a disappointment. “The Roosevelt Administration, it has been asserted, failed to achieve more than it did not as a result of the strength of conservative opposition but because of the intellectual deficiencies of the New Dealers and because Roosevelt deliberately sought to save large scale corporate capitalism.” Leuchtenburg’s emphasis is on Roosevelt’s approach to incorporate “the university-trained experts” to institute change in the role of the government specifically business affairs. As he states in, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, “most of all, Roosevelt was a successful administrator because he attracted to Washington thousands of devoted and highly skilled men.” As a result, it led to the creation of the Banking Act of 1935, the Securities Act of 1933, and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Other programs such as the Federal Housing Administration, Public Works Administration, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the Social Security Act of 1935 transformed the role of the government by providing jobs and assistance to those in need. Leuchtenburg concludes on how under the Roosevelt administration assistance was provided not as charity, but as a right, a social right. The historical significance…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roosevelt Presidency

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Roosevelt didn’t like the impact that trusts had on local small business. But at the same time he believed that large-scale production and industrial growth were necessary and beneficial to the economy and country and control was needed. Hence, he made a policy to differentiate and pick out the “good” and the “bad” trusts. Supporting the good ones and eradicating the bad. He went after the Northern Securities Company for a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. This company was made up big shots like such as Rockefeller and J. P. Morgan. The Supreme Court ordered the company to be disband. He also went after then the American Tobacco Company, New Haven Railroad, and Standard Oil. All made things for his successor –Mr. Taft-…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    chapter 21

    • 10774 Words
    • 57 Pages

    CHAP TE R 21 Progressivism from the Grass Roots to the White House 1890–1916 CHAPTER LEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading and studying this chapter, students should be able to: • Explain grassroots progressivism including its proponents, and why they targeted the city for reform. Understand why activists formed alliances with the working class and under what circumstances those alliances proved successful. • Recognize the intellectual underpinnings of progressivism.…

    • 10774 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Newly elected president Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) made his First Inaugural Address March 4, 1933. FDR spoke with an openness and frankness about the current economic condition of the U.S. He placed the blame squarely on the “Practices of the unscrupulous money changers stand indicted in the court of public opinion, rejected by the hearts and minds of men” (Roosevelt, 1933 p. 1). The money changers FDR referred to where those who controlled the stock market and the banking industry. FDR believed that those institutions only sought profit. FDR followed up his assertion by stating, “there must be an end to a conduct in banking and in business which too often has given to a sacred trust the likeness of callous and selfish wrongdoing” (Roosevelt, 1933 p. 2). Roosevelt’s primary plan for gaining control of the nation’s finances was to revamp and reform the banking industry and place restrictions on the stock…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having for the first time in 20 years a republican president, rich people from Eisenhower’s cabinet felt lie they could intervene to cancel Truman's Fair Deal and Roosevelt's New Deal arguing that they just add to government expenses. However, Eisenhower didn’t approve their suggestions because he knew that if any political party attempted to close down Social Security, cut out the unemployment payments and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, it would disappear from political history. Eisenhower wanted to take more of a modern approach and while keeping some of Truman's and Roosevelt's principals, he wanted to give the individuals and the market their freedom. He named his philosophy “The Modern Republicanism.” Not only did he keep the…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New Deal Policies

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some people argue that theforward thinking policies of the New Deal did not radically alter U.S business,but instead conserved and protected it. This statement is extremely valid. Roosevelt developed his New Deal policies to help to bolster Americaneconomy not to reshape the capitalistic economy that America had adoptedhundreds of years ago. Rooseveltbelieved, however, in very active government interaction and in some casesintervention with big business. Roosevelt believed so heavily in the government getting involved withthe economy in order to assist the average American, the forgotten people, thathe created associations and organizations that got the United States governmentinvolved in…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marijuana history

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The History of the Non-Medical Use of Drugs in the United States by Charles Whitebread, 1995.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Google-China Controversy

    • 3145 Words
    • 13 Pages

    [6] W. WILSON, THE NEW FREEDOM1 13-14 (1913); see also id. at 130 ("Government must, if it is to…

    • 3145 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a difference between loving one’s country and inflicting your beliefs to other people or country. Believing that one’s country is superior over another or trying to influence another nation to be like yours is nationalism. It is very dangerous and can lead to war between countries. Many countries are and have been affected by nationalism like Australia, and Most of Northern Europe. Nationalism is still effective today, all over the world and in the US. Loyalty to a country should still be moral and rational, asinine people take it to its extremities. Like Albert Camus once said, “I should like to be able to love my country and still love justice.”…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays