National Values, Performance Appraisal Practices, and Organizational Performance: a Study Across 21 Countries Hilla Peretz
NATIONAL VALUES, PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PRACTICES, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A STUDY ACROSS 21 COUNTRIES HILLA PERETZ
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Ort Braude College, Israel Snunit 5 St., P.O.Box 78, Karmiel 21982, Israel
YITZHAK FRIED
Whitman School of Management, Syracuse University
This study was funded by a grant from the SHRM Foundation. However, the interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view of the SHRM Foundation. Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management, August 2008 ABSTRACT Using two independent databases, this study explored: (a) the influence of national values on performance appraisal (PA) practices adopted by organizations; and (b) the interactive effects of national values and PA practices on organizational performance indicators. Data from 5,991 organizations in 21 countries were obtained for this study. Results showed that national values explained PA strategies, confirming the study hypotheses. In addition, our hypothesized interaction effects between national values and PA programs on organizational outcomes were supported. The results have strong implications for organizations operating in different societies concerning how to maximize the fit between particular cultures and PA practices in order to enhance organizational performance. INTRODUCTION Performance appraisal (PA) has long been a key human resource practice in the US and as such has been extensively analyzed and investigated (e.g., Fried, Levi, Ben-David, Tiegs, & Avital, 2000; Mero, Guidice, & Anna, 2006; Murphy & Cleveland, 1995). However, relatively little research has been conducted on the role of PA in the global economy (e.g., Aycan, 2005). The purpose of the present study is twofold: to investigate (a) the influence of national values on PA practices; and (b) the interactive effects of national values and PA practices on organizational performance indicators (i.e.,
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Ort Braude College, Israel Snunit 5 St., P.O.Box 78, Karmiel 21982, Israel
YITZHAK FRIED
Whitman School of Management, Syracuse University
This study was funded by a grant from the SHRM Foundation. However, the interpretations, conclusions and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view of the SHRM Foundation. Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management, August 2008 ABSTRACT Using two independent databases, this study explored: (a) the influence of national values on performance appraisal (PA) practices adopted by organizations; and (b) the interactive effects of national values and PA practices on organizational performance indicators. Data from 5,991 organizations in 21 countries were obtained for this study. Results showed that national values explained PA strategies, confirming the study hypotheses. In addition, our hypothesized interaction effects between national values and PA programs on organizational outcomes were supported. The results have strong implications for organizations operating in different societies concerning how to maximize the fit between particular cultures and PA practices in order to enhance organizational performance. INTRODUCTION Performance appraisal (PA) has long been a key human resource practice in the US and as such has been extensively analyzed and investigated (e.g., Fried, Levi, Ben-David, Tiegs, & Avital, 2000; Mero, Guidice, & Anna, 2006; Murphy & Cleveland, 1995). However, relatively little research has been conducted on the role of PA in the global economy (e.g., Aycan, 2005). The purpose of the present study is twofold: to investigate (a) the influence of national values on PA practices; and (b) the interactive effects of national values and PA practices on organizational performance indicators (i.e.,
References: Aycan, Z. (2005). The interplay between cultural and institutional/structural contingencies in human resource management practices. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 7, 1083-1119. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R.N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G. & Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10-country comparison. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 1, 192-221. Brown, M (2005). Managing the overload? Group & Organization Management, 30 (1), 99-124 Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models, Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Fischer, R., Ferreira, M.C., Assmar, E.M.L., Redford, P. & Harb, C. (2005). Organizational behavior across cultures: Theoretical and methodological issues for developing multi-level frameworks involving culture. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5, 1, 2748. Fried, Y., Levi, A.S., Ben-David, H.A., Tiegs, R. & Avital, N. (2000). Rater positive and negative mood predispositions as predictors of performance ratings of ratees in simulated and real organizational settings: evidence from U.S. and Israeli samples. Journal of Occupational And Organizational Psychology, 73, 373-378. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hofstede, G. & Peterson, M.F. (2000). Culture: National values and organizational practices. Ch. 25 in N.M. Ashkanasy, C.P.M. Wilderom & M.F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. House, R., Hanges, P, Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kanungo, R.N. and Jaeger, A.M. (1990) ‘Introduction: The Need for Indigenous Management in Developing Countries’. In Jaeger, A.M. and Kanungo, R.N. (eds) Management in Developing Countries. London: Routledge. Kim, S. (1999). Globalization of human resource management: A cross-cultural perspective for the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 28, 2, 227-243. Mero, N.P., Guidice, R.M., & Anna, L.A. (2006). The interacting effects of accountability and individual differences on rater response to a performance-rating task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 795- 819. Murphy, K. R. and Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Performance Appraisal: An Organizational Perspective. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA Schwartz, S.H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48, 1, 23-47 Vallance, S. (1999). Performance appraisal in Singapore, Thailand and Philippines: A cultural perspective. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 58, 78-86.