Preview

Napoleon Iii of France and Monarchists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
654 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Napoleon Iii of France and Monarchists
Why were the monarchists more successful than the republicans in unifying Italy by 1871?

The Monarchists had already assumed a position of power in Italy when the republican movement was initiated by Mazzini. This is particularly important when talking about its unification because they possessed the authority to legitimately influence important decisions. It was because Cavour decided to aim for economic development and a liberal approach at governance therefore that he could incline the opinion of Lucca, Tuscany, Modena, Parma and Romagna towards uniting themselves with Piedmont. The system of monarchy was popular in Europe throughout the 19th century, so there weren’t a lot of countries that had an objection to it in Italy. Therefore, the monarchists also faced much less repression. It was also because the monarchs opted to win over powerful entities like the Catholic Church and France. This gave them an added edge in terms of fighting Austria, which was a country largely in favor of a divided Italy. It was as a result of the alliance between Cavour and Napoleon III that the battle of Magenta and Solferino were fought and Lombardy was won back. The efforts made by different republicans weren’t entirely negligible. Mazzini managed to influence many people with his ideas including Garibaldi. He was responsible for the creation of Young Italy. However, the society’s attempts to penetrate the Sardianian army, invade Savoy and provoke a revolution in Genoa ended in a disaster. Also, Garibaldi’s expedition, more popularly known as the advent of ‘The Thousand’ yielded significant results. It was because of this that King Francis II was forced to abandon Naples. After Garibaldi had set sail, however, Cavour realized that he was succeeding and there was a high chance that he would aim at taking over Rome. This would cause problems in two ways, first because Europe would intervene and second because it would completely destroy relations Italy’s relations with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte was the first emperor of France from 1804 to 1814. He is famous for his efforts to form a connected Europe that France would lead. His career as a military and political leader led to many big accomplishments, but unfortunately he became too greedy over time leading to his exile.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 1789 to 1799, France had endured the leadership of an Absolute Monarchy by Louis XVI and dictatorship by Napoleon Bonaparte. Many things differentiated the two rulers, some of which consisted of the religious, and political aspects of the country.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Italian unification: Savoy- ruled Piedmont in N Italy = best hope for unification when lead by Count Camillo di Cavour prime minister to Victor Emmanuel II.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    18. After the rule of Napoleon, Louis XVIII returned France to pre-revolutionary conditions in certain aspects of society and politics. For example, Louis brought back restrictions to religion, Protestants were tormented for their faith. Louis accepted the Code that had been developed by Napoleon but banned divorce, although it had been permitted during the revolution. Louis restored Catholic superiority, this had a trickling effect on the doings of the revolution, restricting rights and restoring inequality.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Revolutions broke out in Italy in January making it the first revolt of this historic year. The Italian peninsula was made up of many smaller states and hadn’t yet been unified into one country. Revolutionaries demanded freedom from foreign powers, unification of the peninsula, and the creation of a constitutional government which provided more civil liberties to the people. The leaders of several Italian states such as Sicily, Piedmont, and Tuscany along with Pope Pius IX granted the creation of constitutions for…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Muthan1

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though some wanted to stick to tradition, there were some important and influential people who encouraged the unification. Giuseppe Mazzini, attorney, believed that Italy deserved to be a nation and it was about time all the parts of the monarchy to be part of one big republic in unification. Along with Mazzini, Carlo Cattaneo, philosopher and political activist, also believed in the unification of this monarchy would be a right step for Italy. He said that even though it would mix them, it won’t take their culture and traditions off the grid like they believed, but instead, they would all be appreciated and remembered. Vincenzo Gioberti, a priest of Piedmont stated that the unification would actually make the kings stronger without damaging their own independence.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Austria had a massive empire in the early 19th century, Italy only being a small part. The 1815 Congress of Vienna had given Austria direct control over Lombardy and Venetia, and had also put an Austrian family in charge of ruling smaller duchies such as Parma and Modena. As such, Austria had dominating control over a lot of Italy. However, this was not the only reason why Italian revolutionaries failed. Other factors included the fact that there was no foreign support against Austria and other foreign rulers in Italy and the fact that there was a lack of cooperation between the various revolutionaries.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Garibaldi's popularity, his skill at rousing the common people, and his military exploits are all credited with making the unification of Italy possible. He also served as a global exemplar of mid-19th century revolutionary nationalism and liberalism. But following the liberation of southern Italy from the Neapolitan monarchy, Garibaldi chose to…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Napoleon Bonaparte a hero or a tyrant? Did the good of his actions outweigh the bad? Napoleon Bonaparte was a French military leader who rose to power during the French Revolution. He eventually conquered most of Europe and named himself emperor. I believe that Napoleon was a tyrant for a few different reasons. These include that he was egotistical, selfish, and untruthful.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte Tyrant

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Born in 1769, Napoleon Bonaparte is one of the most famous people of French history. Being immersed in the military from the age of 9 and on, it is no wonder that he became one of, arguably, the best military leaders of all time. But, the question comes about, was Napoleon a hero or a tyrant? Along with the many good things that Napoleon did to help the people of France after the French Revolution, came some very, very bad things. In no time he went from being loved and adored by the people of France to being absolutely loathed. Some people argue that even with all the bad things that he did, Bonaparte was still a hero, but how can somebody who did so many terrible things still be a hero? Napoleon was a tyrant because of his belief in equality for only half of the…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An over-riding aim of Cavour's was to ensure that Piedmont became the leading Italian state, more powerful than all others in economy, trade and organisation of government. Cavour had the benefit of running an already forward-thinking and modern state. He saw this as an advantage and exploited it. Advancements in trade meant economic growth; free trading treaties with other countries saw a 30% rise in exports and 40% in imports. Reduction in the power of the Church, another of Cavour's aims, was sped up by the introduction of the Siccardi Laws. These stated several drastic alterations such as the new inability to seek refuge in the Church, as well as the abolishment of separate courts. This change in government was also all part of the new constitutional government that Cavour was maintaining. He attempted to reduce bureaucracy by centralising power and reducing the number of roles per job in government. Piedmont was also the only state to run by a constitution, the Statuto, that remained thanks to Austria following the 1848-9 revolutions. The benefit of already having these changes in place meant that Cavour simply had to maintain this positive attitude and take it forward.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This movement is one example of how a movement that also shows nationalism characteristics can create unification among Italy. The Congress of Vienna and the end of Napoleonic rule lead to a nationalism increase for Italy. This increase brought unity because the people starting feeling as though they had a say in what was happening instead of having one person make all the decisions. This group and the end of this rule demonstrates how there can be a unity increase coming from any sort of source. Finally, in March 1861, a parliament of all of Italy except Rome and Venetia, agreed on unifying Italy with Victor Emmanuel as its first king.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This source is a book about Robespierre’s influence on the French Revolution. The author is called Tom McGowen and it was published on the year 2000 in the United States of America. The purpose of this book is to inform the process that occurred for the fall of the monarchy and what occurred after it. The author chose to do it in a story format so that the reader understands the information in a entertaining and interesting way. The author wrote this book intended to a person who is researching about Robespierre and would like to learn about it in an interesting way. From this book it is noticeable that the Jacobins, led by Robespierre, influenced the fall of the monarchy. As well, it is clear that at that time in history, people saw Robespierre as a person that would benefit France, and that made them follow his ideas. The limitations of this source are that it does not have an expert review from a person of that time. Also, it does not give the perspective of King Louis…

    • 1938 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Italian people were living in the control of foreign rulers. The ideal Italian leaders were Giuseppe Mazzini, Cavour, and Giuseppe Garibaldi. Mazzini centralized the republic and gave more emphasis on the right and the will of the people. Next, Gioberti headed the federation of existing states, and then Italian nations were built around the aristocratic kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont as german looked towards Prussia. Cavour has played a prominent role in the Sardinina government from the period 1850 to 1861. He was recognized as a dominant figure during that time. In 1852, Cavour was elected as a chief minister in the Sardinian monarchy. Likewise Cavour made the necessary arrangements and took actions wisely in order to integrate northern and central Italy. Also, Cavour acquainted several programs of railroads, highways, civil liberties and provided assistance for Sardinia. Moreover, with the help of France, he achieved victory over Austria and Lombardy. Thereafter Garbaldi removed the Sicily kingdom and then finally in 1860, southern Italy and Sicily was given to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays